Cargando…

Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters

Impaired response inhibition plays a major role in many addictive behaviors. However, in studies using go/no-go tasks, findings regarding the presence of response inhibition deficits in nicotine-dependent individuals are mixed. This might be due to differences between studies on a number of task par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xin, Liu, Xiaoting, Zan, Xiangyi, Jin, Ge, Maes, Joseph H. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160595
_version_ 1782446928269672448
author Zhao, Xin
Liu, Xiaoting
Zan, Xiangyi
Jin, Ge
Maes, Joseph H. R.
author_facet Zhao, Xin
Liu, Xiaoting
Zan, Xiangyi
Jin, Ge
Maes, Joseph H. R.
author_sort Zhao, Xin
collection PubMed
description Impaired response inhibition plays a major role in many addictive behaviors. However, in studies using go/no-go tasks, findings regarding the presence of response inhibition deficits in nicotine-dependent individuals are mixed. This might be due to differences between studies on a number of task parameters. Here we aimed to identify task conditions under which go/no-go task performance deficits can be observed in smokers and to characterize the nature of such deficits. Sixty-one male students (30 smokers, 31 non-smokers) performed a go/no-go task while independently manipulating three task parameters: (1) percentage no-go trials (50% or 25%), (2) stimulus presentation time (600 ms or 200 ms), and (3) nature of no-go stimuli (cigarette related or cigarette unrelated). Three measures, reaction time on go trials and percentage correct responses on go and no-go trials, served as performance indicators. Under 200-ms but not 600-ms stimulus presentation conditions, the smokers responded faster on go trials and made more errors on both go and no-go trials than the non-smokers did. These differences occurred irrespective of the percentage of no-go trials and nature of no-go stimuli. The accuracy differences disappeared after controlling for the response time differences, suggesting a strong speed-accuracy trade-off. This study contributes to unraveling the conditions under which smokers display impaired inhibition performance and helps to characterize the nature of this impairment. Under task conditions prompting fast responding, smokers are more prone to increase response speed and to make more errors than non-smokers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4976868
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49768682016-08-25 Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters Zhao, Xin Liu, Xiaoting Zan, Xiangyi Jin, Ge Maes, Joseph H. R. PLoS One Research Article Impaired response inhibition plays a major role in many addictive behaviors. However, in studies using go/no-go tasks, findings regarding the presence of response inhibition deficits in nicotine-dependent individuals are mixed. This might be due to differences between studies on a number of task parameters. Here we aimed to identify task conditions under which go/no-go task performance deficits can be observed in smokers and to characterize the nature of such deficits. Sixty-one male students (30 smokers, 31 non-smokers) performed a go/no-go task while independently manipulating three task parameters: (1) percentage no-go trials (50% or 25%), (2) stimulus presentation time (600 ms or 200 ms), and (3) nature of no-go stimuli (cigarette related or cigarette unrelated). Three measures, reaction time on go trials and percentage correct responses on go and no-go trials, served as performance indicators. Under 200-ms but not 600-ms stimulus presentation conditions, the smokers responded faster on go trials and made more errors on both go and no-go trials than the non-smokers did. These differences occurred irrespective of the percentage of no-go trials and nature of no-go stimuli. The accuracy differences disappeared after controlling for the response time differences, suggesting a strong speed-accuracy trade-off. This study contributes to unraveling the conditions under which smokers display impaired inhibition performance and helps to characterize the nature of this impairment. Under task conditions prompting fast responding, smokers are more prone to increase response speed and to make more errors than non-smokers. Public Library of Science 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4976868/ /pubmed/27500831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160595 Text en © 2016 Zhao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhao, Xin
Liu, Xiaoting
Zan, Xiangyi
Jin, Ge
Maes, Joseph H. R.
Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title_full Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title_fullStr Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title_short Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters
title_sort male smokers' and non-smokers' response inhibition in go/no-go tasks: effect of three task parameters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976868/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160595
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxin malesmokersandnonsmokersresponseinhibitioningonogotaskseffectofthreetaskparameters
AT liuxiaoting malesmokersandnonsmokersresponseinhibitioningonogotaskseffectofthreetaskparameters
AT zanxiangyi malesmokersandnonsmokersresponseinhibitioningonogotaskseffectofthreetaskparameters
AT jinge malesmokersandnonsmokersresponseinhibitioningonogotaskseffectofthreetaskparameters
AT maesjosephhr malesmokersandnonsmokersresponseinhibitioningonogotaskseffectofthreetaskparameters