Cargando…
Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected
Two independent trials were carried out to evaluate the effect of feed form, whole wheat (WW) and oat hulls (OH) addition on gastrointestinal (GIT) weight and Campylobacter jejuni colonization in orally infected birds. In Trial 1, there were six treatments factorially arranged with two feed forms (m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160858 |
_version_ | 1782446947776331776 |
---|---|
author | Gracia, Marta Isabel Sánchez, Jaime Millán, Carlos Casabuena, Óscar Vesseur, Peter Martín, Ángel García-Peña, Francisco Javier Medel, Pedro |
author_facet | Gracia, Marta Isabel Sánchez, Jaime Millán, Carlos Casabuena, Óscar Vesseur, Peter Martín, Ángel García-Peña, Francisco Javier Medel, Pedro |
author_sort | Gracia, Marta Isabel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two independent trials were carried out to evaluate the effect of feed form, whole wheat (WW) and oat hulls (OH) addition on gastrointestinal (GIT) weight and Campylobacter jejuni colonization in orally infected birds. In Trial 1, there were six treatments factorially arranged with two feed forms (mash vs pellets), and three levels of WW from 1-21/22-42d: 0/0, 7.5/15%, 15/30%. Broilers were allocated in cages (3 birds/cage, 12 cages/treatment). In Trial 2, there were three treatments: a mash diet, a mash diet including WW (7.5% from 1–21 and 15% from 22-42d), and a third treatment including also 5%OH. Broilers were allocated in floor pens (1 pen with 30 birds/treatment). At 14d, all broilers in Trial 1 or 3 broilers/pen in Trial 2 were orally challenged with 1.5 x 10(5) cfu of C. jejuni ST-45 /. In Trial 1, birds fed pelleted diets consumed 13.5% more feed, gained 31% more weight, and presented 12.9% better feed conversion for the whole trial (P<0.05). Pelleting decreased the relative weight of GIT and gizzard and increased the relative weight of proventriculus (P<0.05). Mash diets decreased pH in the gizzard (P<0.05). Inclusion of WW decreased the relative weight of proventriculus, increased gizzard weight, and reduced pH in the gizzard (P<0.05). At 21d of age, mash tended to reduce C. jejuni compared to pellets (7.85 vs 8.27 log(10)cfu/g; P = 0.091) and WW inclusion at 7.5/15% reduced C. jejuni colonization when compared to lower and higher inclusion (P<0.05). In Trial 2, birds fed T3 (WW+OH) showed 1.38 log(10)cfu/g less than birds fed Control diet (P<0.05). In conclusion, despite of the clear morphological changes in the GIT derived of FF and WW inclusion, no clear reductions in C. jejuni populations in the ceca were observed. However, WW and OH inclusion to mash diets significantly reduced cecal C. jejuni colonization at 42 days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4976972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49769722016-08-25 Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected Gracia, Marta Isabel Sánchez, Jaime Millán, Carlos Casabuena, Óscar Vesseur, Peter Martín, Ángel García-Peña, Francisco Javier Medel, Pedro PLoS One Research Article Two independent trials were carried out to evaluate the effect of feed form, whole wheat (WW) and oat hulls (OH) addition on gastrointestinal (GIT) weight and Campylobacter jejuni colonization in orally infected birds. In Trial 1, there were six treatments factorially arranged with two feed forms (mash vs pellets), and three levels of WW from 1-21/22-42d: 0/0, 7.5/15%, 15/30%. Broilers were allocated in cages (3 birds/cage, 12 cages/treatment). In Trial 2, there were three treatments: a mash diet, a mash diet including WW (7.5% from 1–21 and 15% from 22-42d), and a third treatment including also 5%OH. Broilers were allocated in floor pens (1 pen with 30 birds/treatment). At 14d, all broilers in Trial 1 or 3 broilers/pen in Trial 2 were orally challenged with 1.5 x 10(5) cfu of C. jejuni ST-45 /. In Trial 1, birds fed pelleted diets consumed 13.5% more feed, gained 31% more weight, and presented 12.9% better feed conversion for the whole trial (P<0.05). Pelleting decreased the relative weight of GIT and gizzard and increased the relative weight of proventriculus (P<0.05). Mash diets decreased pH in the gizzard (P<0.05). Inclusion of WW decreased the relative weight of proventriculus, increased gizzard weight, and reduced pH in the gizzard (P<0.05). At 21d of age, mash tended to reduce C. jejuni compared to pellets (7.85 vs 8.27 log(10)cfu/g; P = 0.091) and WW inclusion at 7.5/15% reduced C. jejuni colonization when compared to lower and higher inclusion (P<0.05). In Trial 2, birds fed T3 (WW+OH) showed 1.38 log(10)cfu/g less than birds fed Control diet (P<0.05). In conclusion, despite of the clear morphological changes in the GIT derived of FF and WW inclusion, no clear reductions in C. jejuni populations in the ceca were observed. However, WW and OH inclusion to mash diets significantly reduced cecal C. jejuni colonization at 42 days. Public Library of Science 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4976972/ /pubmed/27500730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160858 Text en © 2016 Gracia et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gracia, Marta Isabel Sánchez, Jaime Millán, Carlos Casabuena, Óscar Vesseur, Peter Martín, Ángel García-Peña, Francisco Javier Medel, Pedro Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title | Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title_full | Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title_fullStr | Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title_short | Effect of Feed Form and Whole Grain Feeding on Gastrointestinal Weight and the Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers Orally Infected |
title_sort | effect of feed form and whole grain feeding on gastrointestinal weight and the prevalence of campylobacter jejuni in broilers orally infected |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27500730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graciamartaisabel effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT sanchezjaime effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT millancarlos effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT casabuenaoscar effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT vesseurpeter effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT martinangel effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT garciapenafranciscojavier effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected AT medelpedro effectoffeedformandwholegrainfeedingongastrointestinalweightandtheprevalenceofcampylobacterjejuniinbroilersorallyinfected |