Cargando…
Key Elements for Judging the Quality of a Risk Assessment
BACKGROUND: Many reports have been published that contain recommendations for improving the quality, transparency, and usefulness of decision making for risk assessments prepared by agencies of the U.S. federal government. A substantial measure of consensus has emerged regarding the characteristics...
Autores principales: | Fenner-Crisp, Penelope A., Dellarco, Vicki L. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26862984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510483 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The codification of hazard and its impact on the hazard versus risk controversy
por: Doe, John E., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: Do not judge a tube by its cover
por: Pathak Ray, Vanita
Publicado: (2023) -
A new approach to the classification of carcinogenicity
por: Doe, John E., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The need for scientists and judges to work together: regarding a new European network
por: Santosuosso, Amedeo, et al.
Publicado: (2003) -
The criteria used by key decision makers in Australia to
judge the academic quality of NTROs
por: McKee, Alan
Publicado: (2020)