Cargando…

An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series

BACKGROUND: The practice of breast reconstruction continues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies. The authors describe a unique approach allowing immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction that can be performed on an outpatient basis. METHODS: After a nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Downs, Ronald K., Hedges, Kellee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839
_version_ 1782446978980904960
author Downs, Ronald K.
Hedges, Kellee
author_facet Downs, Ronald K.
Hedges, Kellee
author_sort Downs, Ronald K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The practice of breast reconstruction continues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies. The authors describe a unique approach allowing immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction that can be performed on an outpatient basis. METHODS: After a nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-covered implants are placed in a prepectoral position in an immediate reconstruction. Assessment of results was performed via a retrospective review of demographic and procedural data. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (79 breasts), mean age 46.8 years, were treated with direct-to-implant reconstruction using ADM-wrapped implants placed above the muscle with mean follow-up of 23.1 months (median 22 mo). Mean body mass index was 24.3, and 15 patients (33.3%) were current or former smokers. Twenty-seven patients (60%) had prior breast surgery with 22 (49%) exposed to chemotherapy and 34 (76%) radiation. Procedure time averaged 155 minutes and hospital length of stay averaged 0.6 days. Complications included flap necrosis in 22 cases (28%), seroma in 12 (15%), infection in 8 (10%), rippling in 28 (35%), and contracture in 8 (10%). In 14 breasts (18%), postoperative wound complications (flap necrosis or infection) led to implant loss. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of ADM and cohesive gel implants has allowed us to perform above-the-muscle implant breast reconstruction in reduced time and often on an outpatient basis. Complication rates were comparable to expected results of standard expander-to-implant, staged breast reconstruction. This technique is a viable option delivering clinically and aesthetically acceptable results in select patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49771492016-08-17 An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series Downs, Ronald K. Hedges, Kellee Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: The practice of breast reconstruction continues to evolve with the introduction of new technologies. The authors describe a unique approach allowing immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction that can be performed on an outpatient basis. METHODS: After a nipple-sparing mastectomy, acellular dermal matrix (ADM)-covered implants are placed in a prepectoral position in an immediate reconstruction. Assessment of results was performed via a retrospective review of demographic and procedural data. RESULTS: Forty-five patients (79 breasts), mean age 46.8 years, were treated with direct-to-implant reconstruction using ADM-wrapped implants placed above the muscle with mean follow-up of 23.1 months (median 22 mo). Mean body mass index was 24.3, and 15 patients (33.3%) were current or former smokers. Twenty-seven patients (60%) had prior breast surgery with 22 (49%) exposed to chemotherapy and 34 (76%) radiation. Procedure time averaged 155 minutes and hospital length of stay averaged 0.6 days. Complications included flap necrosis in 22 cases (28%), seroma in 12 (15%), infection in 8 (10%), rippling in 28 (35%), and contracture in 8 (10%). In 14 breasts (18%), postoperative wound complications (flap necrosis or infection) led to implant loss. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of ADM and cohesive gel implants has allowed us to perform above-the-muscle implant breast reconstruction in reduced time and often on an outpatient basis. Complication rates were comparable to expected results of standard expander-to-implant, staged breast reconstruction. This technique is a viable option delivering clinically and aesthetically acceptable results in select patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4977149/ /pubmed/27536500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Downs, Ronald K.
Hedges, Kellee
An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title_full An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title_fullStr An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title_short An Alternative Technique for Immediate Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction—A Case Series
title_sort alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27536500
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000839
work_keys_str_mv AT downsronaldk analternativetechniqueforimmediatedirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionacaseseries
AT hedgeskellee analternativetechniqueforimmediatedirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionacaseseries
AT downsronaldk alternativetechniqueforimmediatedirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionacaseseries
AT hedgeskellee alternativetechniqueforimmediatedirecttoimplantbreastreconstructionacaseseries