Cargando…

Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group

BACKGROUND: The ultrasound (US)-guided technique has been recommended for central venous catheter (CVC) placement in critical care. However, several surveys have shown that the majority of physicians continue to perform landmark procedures. In our region, we have implemented special courses to promo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maizel, Julien, Bastide, Marie-Anaïs, Richecoeur, Jack, Frenoy, Eric, Lemaire, Christian, Sauneuf, Bertrand, Dupont, Hervé, Tamion, Fabienne, Nseir, Saad, Du Cheyron, Damien
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0177-x
_version_ 1782446993452302336
author Maizel, Julien
Bastide, Marie-Anaïs
Richecoeur, Jack
Frenoy, Eric
Lemaire, Christian
Sauneuf, Bertrand
Dupont, Hervé
Tamion, Fabienne
Nseir, Saad
Du Cheyron, Damien
author_facet Maizel, Julien
Bastide, Marie-Anaïs
Richecoeur, Jack
Frenoy, Eric
Lemaire, Christian
Sauneuf, Bertrand
Dupont, Hervé
Tamion, Fabienne
Nseir, Saad
Du Cheyron, Damien
author_sort Maizel, Julien
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The ultrasound (US)-guided technique has been recommended for central venous catheter (CVC) placement in critical care. However, several surveys have shown that the majority of physicians continue to perform landmark procedures. In our region, we have implemented special courses to promote the use of US with formal training and simulators. Ultrasound machines have also been installed in almost every ICU in our area. We designed a survey to investigate whether the training program established for years and the widespread of ultrasound devices in the ICU of our region will be associated with a high rate of physicians performing US procedures. METHODS: A survey comprising 14 questions was designed to elicit information on training in US techniques, the use of US for CVC placement, reasons for nonuse of US and their opinion concerning the need to teach the landmark technique to residents. This survey was electronically sent to every physician of the BoReal study group (32 ICUs located in the North West of France). RESULTS: We received 190 responses (response rate 66 %) including 34 % of residents. Only 11 % of respondents reported the absence of training in the US technique, and 3 % reported they did not have access to an ultrasound machine. A total of 68 % declared “always” (18 %) or “almost always” (50 %) using US to guide CVC placement. Our results are better than those of previous surveys. The main reasons why physicians did not use the US technique were that they thought that US guidance was unnecessary (36 %) or because the ultrasound machine was not immediately available (33 %). Ninety-one percentages think that the landmark technique should still be taught to the residents. A higher proportion of residents compared to seniors declared that they always or almost always used the US technique. CONCLUSION: Training in ultrasound techniques and the widespread availability of ultrasound machines in ICUs seem to improve the rate of US procedures. However, despite strong scientific evidence a proportion of physicians continue to consider the landmark technique as an alternative to US. Training and education are potentially still the best ways to overcome such barriers or conviction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49772632016-08-19 Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group Maizel, Julien Bastide, Marie-Anaïs Richecoeur, Jack Frenoy, Eric Lemaire, Christian Sauneuf, Bertrand Dupont, Hervé Tamion, Fabienne Nseir, Saad Du Cheyron, Damien Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The ultrasound (US)-guided technique has been recommended for central venous catheter (CVC) placement in critical care. However, several surveys have shown that the majority of physicians continue to perform landmark procedures. In our region, we have implemented special courses to promote the use of US with formal training and simulators. Ultrasound machines have also been installed in almost every ICU in our area. We designed a survey to investigate whether the training program established for years and the widespread of ultrasound devices in the ICU of our region will be associated with a high rate of physicians performing US procedures. METHODS: A survey comprising 14 questions was designed to elicit information on training in US techniques, the use of US for CVC placement, reasons for nonuse of US and their opinion concerning the need to teach the landmark technique to residents. This survey was electronically sent to every physician of the BoReal study group (32 ICUs located in the North West of France). RESULTS: We received 190 responses (response rate 66 %) including 34 % of residents. Only 11 % of respondents reported the absence of training in the US technique, and 3 % reported they did not have access to an ultrasound machine. A total of 68 % declared “always” (18 %) or “almost always” (50 %) using US to guide CVC placement. Our results are better than those of previous surveys. The main reasons why physicians did not use the US technique were that they thought that US guidance was unnecessary (36 %) or because the ultrasound machine was not immediately available (33 %). Ninety-one percentages think that the landmark technique should still be taught to the residents. A higher proportion of residents compared to seniors declared that they always or almost always used the US technique. CONCLUSION: Training in ultrasound techniques and the widespread availability of ultrasound machines in ICUs seem to improve the rate of US procedures. However, despite strong scientific evidence a proportion of physicians continue to consider the landmark technique as an alternative to US. Training and education are potentially still the best ways to overcome such barriers or conviction. Springer Paris 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4977263/ /pubmed/27502195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0177-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Maizel, Julien
Bastide, Marie-Anaïs
Richecoeur, Jack
Frenoy, Eric
Lemaire, Christian
Sauneuf, Bertrand
Dupont, Hervé
Tamion, Fabienne
Nseir, Saad
Du Cheyron, Damien
Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title_full Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title_fullStr Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title_full_unstemmed Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title_short Practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the French intensivists: a survey from the BoReal study group
title_sort practice of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter technique by the french intensivists: a survey from the boreal study group
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0177-x
work_keys_str_mv AT maizeljulien practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT bastidemarieanais practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT richecoeurjack practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT frenoyeric practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT lemairechristian practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT sauneufbertrand practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT dupontherve practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT tamionfabienne practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT nseirsaad practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT ducheyrondamien practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup
AT practiceofultrasoundguidedcentralvenouscathetertechniquebythefrenchintensivistsasurveyfromtheborealstudygroup