Cargando…
Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games
Recent research has highlighted the role of prosocial personality traits—agreeableness and honesty-humility—in egalitarian distributions of wealth in the dictator game. Expanding on these findings, we ran two studies to examine individual differences in two other forms of prosociality—generosity and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01137 |
_version_ | 1782447005608443904 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Kun Ferguson, Eamonn Smillie, Luke D. |
author_facet | Zhao, Kun Ferguson, Eamonn Smillie, Luke D. |
author_sort | Zhao, Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent research has highlighted the role of prosocial personality traits—agreeableness and honesty-humility—in egalitarian distributions of wealth in the dictator game. Expanding on these findings, we ran two studies to examine individual differences in two other forms of prosociality—generosity and reciprocity—with respect to two major models of personality, the Big Five and the HEXACO. Participants (combined N = 560) completed a series of economic games in which allocations in the dictator game were compared with those in the generosity game, a non-constant-sum wealth distribution task where proposers with fixed payoffs selected the size of their partner’s payoff (“generosity”). We further examined positive and negative reciprocity by manipulating a partner’s previous move (“reciprocity”). Results showed clear evidence of both generosity and positive reciprocity in social preferences, with allocations to a partner greater in the generosity game than in the dictator game, and greater still when a player had been previously assisted by their partner. There was also a consistent interaction with gender, whereby men were more generous when this was costless and women were more egalitarian overall. Furthermore, these distinct forms of prosociality were differentially predicted by personality traits, in line with the core features of these traits and the theoretical distinctions between them. HEXACO honesty-humility predicted dictator, but not generosity allocations, while traits capturing tendencies toward irritability and anger predicted lower generosity, but not dictator allocations. In contrast, the politeness—but not compassion—aspect of Big Five agreeableness was uniquely and broadly associated with prosociality across all games. These findings support the discriminant validity between related prosocial constructs, and have important implications for understanding the motives and mechanisms taking place within economic games. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49773182016-08-23 Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games Zhao, Kun Ferguson, Eamonn Smillie, Luke D. Front Psychol Psychology Recent research has highlighted the role of prosocial personality traits—agreeableness and honesty-humility—in egalitarian distributions of wealth in the dictator game. Expanding on these findings, we ran two studies to examine individual differences in two other forms of prosociality—generosity and reciprocity—with respect to two major models of personality, the Big Five and the HEXACO. Participants (combined N = 560) completed a series of economic games in which allocations in the dictator game were compared with those in the generosity game, a non-constant-sum wealth distribution task where proposers with fixed payoffs selected the size of their partner’s payoff (“generosity”). We further examined positive and negative reciprocity by manipulating a partner’s previous move (“reciprocity”). Results showed clear evidence of both generosity and positive reciprocity in social preferences, with allocations to a partner greater in the generosity game than in the dictator game, and greater still when a player had been previously assisted by their partner. There was also a consistent interaction with gender, whereby men were more generous when this was costless and women were more egalitarian overall. Furthermore, these distinct forms of prosociality were differentially predicted by personality traits, in line with the core features of these traits and the theoretical distinctions between them. HEXACO honesty-humility predicted dictator, but not generosity allocations, while traits capturing tendencies toward irritability and anger predicted lower generosity, but not dictator allocations. In contrast, the politeness—but not compassion—aspect of Big Five agreeableness was uniquely and broadly associated with prosociality across all games. These findings support the discriminant validity between related prosocial constructs, and have important implications for understanding the motives and mechanisms taking place within economic games. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4977318/ /pubmed/27555824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01137 Text en Copyright © 2016 Zhao, Ferguson and Smillie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Zhao, Kun Ferguson, Eamonn Smillie, Luke D. Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title | Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title_full | Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title_fullStr | Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title_full_unstemmed | Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title_short | Prosocial Personality Traits Differentially Predict Egalitarianism, Generosity, and Reciprocity in Economic Games |
title_sort | prosocial personality traits differentially predict egalitarianism, generosity, and reciprocity in economic games |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27555824 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaokun prosocialpersonalitytraitsdifferentiallypredictegalitarianismgenerosityandreciprocityineconomicgames AT fergusoneamonn prosocialpersonalitytraitsdifferentiallypredictegalitarianismgenerosityandreciprocityineconomicgames AT smillieluked prosocialpersonalitytraitsdifferentiallypredictegalitarianismgenerosityandreciprocityineconomicgames |