Cargando…

Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients

Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beltzer, Christian, Eisenächer, Alexander, Badendieck, Steffen, Doll, Dietrich, Küper, Markus, Lenz, Stefan, Krapohl, Björn Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098
_version_ 1782447015719862272
author Beltzer, Christian
Eisenächer, Alexander
Badendieck, Steffen
Doll, Dietrich
Küper, Markus
Lenz, Stefan
Krapohl, Björn Dirk
author_facet Beltzer, Christian
Eisenächer, Alexander
Badendieck, Steffen
Doll, Dietrich
Küper, Markus
Lenz, Stefan
Krapohl, Björn Dirk
author_sort Beltzer, Christian
collection PubMed
description Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial closure rates (FCR) than other TAC procedures. Material and methods: Patients of our clinic (n=58) who were treated by application of a VAC/VACM treatment manual in the period from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively analysed. Results: The overall FCR of all patients was 48.3% (95% confidence interval: 34.95–61.78). An FCR of 61.3% was achieved in patients who had a vicryl mesh implanted at the fascial level (VACM therapy) in the course of treatment. Mortality among patients treated with VACM therapy was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.32–63.97). Conclusions: The results of our own study confirm the results of previous studies which showed an acceptable FCR among non-trauma patients who were treated with VACM therapy. VACM therapy currently appears to be the treatment regime of choice for patients with OA requiring TAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49773752016-08-19 Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients Beltzer, Christian Eisenächer, Alexander Badendieck, Steffen Doll, Dietrich Küper, Markus Lenz, Stefan Krapohl, Björn Dirk GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW Article Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial closure rates (FCR) than other TAC procedures. Material and methods: Patients of our clinic (n=58) who were treated by application of a VAC/VACM treatment manual in the period from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively analysed. Results: The overall FCR of all patients was 48.3% (95% confidence interval: 34.95–61.78). An FCR of 61.3% was achieved in patients who had a vicryl mesh implanted at the fascial level (VACM therapy) in the course of treatment. Mortality among patients treated with VACM therapy was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.32–63.97). Conclusions: The results of our own study confirm the results of previous studies which showed an acceptable FCR among non-trauma patients who were treated with VACM therapy. VACM therapy currently appears to be the treatment regime of choice for patients with OA requiring TAC. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4977375/ /pubmed/27547691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098 Text en Copyright © 2016 Beltzer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Article
Beltzer, Christian
Eisenächer, Alexander
Badendieck, Steffen
Doll, Dietrich
Küper, Markus
Lenz, Stefan
Krapohl, Björn Dirk
Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title_full Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title_fullStr Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title_short Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
title_sort retrospective analysis of a vacm (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547691
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098
work_keys_str_mv AT beltzerchristian retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT eisenacheralexander retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT badendiecksteffen retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT dolldietrich retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT kupermarkus retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT lenzstefan retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients
AT krapohlbjorndirk retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients