Cargando…
Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients
Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098 |
_version_ | 1782447015719862272 |
---|---|
author | Beltzer, Christian Eisenächer, Alexander Badendieck, Steffen Doll, Dietrich Küper, Markus Lenz, Stefan Krapohl, Björn Dirk |
author_facet | Beltzer, Christian Eisenächer, Alexander Badendieck, Steffen Doll, Dietrich Küper, Markus Lenz, Stefan Krapohl, Björn Dirk |
author_sort | Beltzer, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial closure rates (FCR) than other TAC procedures. Material and methods: Patients of our clinic (n=58) who were treated by application of a VAC/VACM treatment manual in the period from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively analysed. Results: The overall FCR of all patients was 48.3% (95% confidence interval: 34.95–61.78). An FCR of 61.3% was achieved in patients who had a vicryl mesh implanted at the fascial level (VACM therapy) in the course of treatment. Mortality among patients treated with VACM therapy was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.32–63.97). Conclusions: The results of our own study confirm the results of previous studies which showed an acceptable FCR among non-trauma patients who were treated with VACM therapy. VACM therapy currently appears to be the treatment regime of choice for patients with OA requiring TAC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49773752016-08-19 Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients Beltzer, Christian Eisenächer, Alexander Badendieck, Steffen Doll, Dietrich Küper, Markus Lenz, Stefan Krapohl, Björn Dirk GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW Article Introduction: The optimal treatment concept for temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in critically ill visceral surgery patients with open abdomen (OA) continues to be unclear. The VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) therapy seems to permit higher delayed primary fascial closure rates (FCR) than other TAC procedures. Material and methods: Patients of our clinic (n=58) who were treated by application of a VAC/VACM treatment manual in the period from 2005 to 2008 were retrospectively analysed. Results: The overall FCR of all patients was 48.3% (95% confidence interval: 34.95–61.78). An FCR of 61.3% was achieved in patients who had a vicryl mesh implanted at the fascial level (VACM therapy) in the course of treatment. Mortality among patients treated with VACM therapy was 45.2% (95% CI: 27.32–63.97). Conclusions: The results of our own study confirm the results of previous studies which showed an acceptable FCR among non-trauma patients who were treated with VACM therapy. VACM therapy currently appears to be the treatment regime of choice for patients with OA requiring TAC. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2016-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4977375/ /pubmed/27547691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098 Text en Copyright © 2016 Beltzer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. |
spellingShingle | Article Beltzer, Christian Eisenächer, Alexander Badendieck, Steffen Doll, Dietrich Küper, Markus Lenz, Stefan Krapohl, Björn Dirk Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title | Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title_full | Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title_fullStr | Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title_short | Retrospective analysis of a VACM (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
title_sort | retrospective analysis of a vacm (vacuum-assisted closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction) treatment manual for temporary abdominal wall closure – results of 58 consecutive patients |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547691 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/iprs000098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beltzerchristian retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT eisenacheralexander retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT badendiecksteffen retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT dolldietrich retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT kupermarkus retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT lenzstefan retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients AT krapohlbjorndirk retrospectiveanalysisofavacmvacuumassistedclosureandmeshmediatedfascialtractiontreatmentmanualfortemporaryabdominalwallclosureresultsof58consecutivepatients |