Cargando…

Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokn, Amir Reza, Shakeri, Abbas Seyed, Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo, Alaeddini, Mojgan, Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza, Manasheof, Rebecca, Barikani, Hamidreza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507993
_version_ 1782447022786215936
author Rokn, Amir Reza
Shakeri, Abbas Seyed
Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo
Alaeddini, Mojgan
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
Manasheof, Rebecca
Barikani, Hamidreza
author_facet Rokn, Amir Reza
Shakeri, Abbas Seyed
Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo
Alaeddini, Mojgan
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
Manasheof, Rebecca
Barikani, Hamidreza
author_sort Rokn, Amir Reza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely ITB, CenoBone and Grafton were placed and one defect served as control. Samples were prepared and histomorphometric evaluations were carried out after healing periods of four weeks (interval 1) and eight weeks (interval 2). Qualitative and quantities variables were compared and analyzed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Mild inflammation was observed in 45% and 12.5% of the samples in the first and second intervals, respectively. Foreign body reaction was observed in only 5% of the samples. The quality of regenerated bone was immature, mixed and lamellar in 54.5%, 15.9% and 4.5% of the samples, respectively. The rate of allograft resorption was the highest and lowest in the CenoBone and Grafton samples, respectively. The mean amount of regenerated bone was higher in areas containing Grafton; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the numerical values of bone regeneration, there were no statistically significant differences in bone generation among the material groups, and allografts manufactured in Iran can be suitable alternatives to Grafton with the same good properties. Further studies are necessary to clarify the efficacy of these allografts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49774062016-08-09 Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study Rokn, Amir Reza Shakeri, Abbas Seyed Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo Alaeddini, Mojgan Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Manasheof, Rebecca Barikani, Hamidreza J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely ITB, CenoBone and Grafton were placed and one defect served as control. Samples were prepared and histomorphometric evaluations were carried out after healing periods of four weeks (interval 1) and eight weeks (interval 2). Qualitative and quantities variables were compared and analyzed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Mild inflammation was observed in 45% and 12.5% of the samples in the first and second intervals, respectively. Foreign body reaction was observed in only 5% of the samples. The quality of regenerated bone was immature, mixed and lamellar in 54.5%, 15.9% and 4.5% of the samples, respectively. The rate of allograft resorption was the highest and lowest in the CenoBone and Grafton samples, respectively. The mean amount of regenerated bone was higher in areas containing Grafton; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the numerical values of bone regeneration, there were no statistically significant differences in bone generation among the material groups, and allografts manufactured in Iran can be suitable alternatives to Grafton with the same good properties. Further studies are necessary to clarify the efficacy of these allografts. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4977406/ /pubmed/27507993 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rokn, Amir Reza
Shakeri, Abbas Seyed
Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo
Alaeddini, Mojgan
Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza
Manasheof, Rebecca
Barikani, Hamidreza
Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title_full Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title_fullStr Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title_full_unstemmed Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title_short Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
title_sort regenerative effects of three types of allografts on rabbit calvarium: an animal study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507993
work_keys_str_mv AT roknamirreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT shakeriabbasseyed regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT etemadmoghadamshahroo regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT alaeddinimojgan regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT shamshiriahmadreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT manasheofrebecca regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy
AT barikanihamidreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy