Cargando…
Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507993 |
_version_ | 1782447022786215936 |
---|---|
author | Rokn, Amir Reza Shakeri, Abbas Seyed Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo Alaeddini, Mojgan Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Manasheof, Rebecca Barikani, Hamidreza |
author_facet | Rokn, Amir Reza Shakeri, Abbas Seyed Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo Alaeddini, Mojgan Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Manasheof, Rebecca Barikani, Hamidreza |
author_sort | Rokn, Amir Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely ITB, CenoBone and Grafton were placed and one defect served as control. Samples were prepared and histomorphometric evaluations were carried out after healing periods of four weeks (interval 1) and eight weeks (interval 2). Qualitative and quantities variables were compared and analyzed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Mild inflammation was observed in 45% and 12.5% of the samples in the first and second intervals, respectively. Foreign body reaction was observed in only 5% of the samples. The quality of regenerated bone was immature, mixed and lamellar in 54.5%, 15.9% and 4.5% of the samples, respectively. The rate of allograft resorption was the highest and lowest in the CenoBone and Grafton samples, respectively. The mean amount of regenerated bone was higher in areas containing Grafton; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the numerical values of bone regeneration, there were no statistically significant differences in bone generation among the material groups, and allografts manufactured in Iran can be suitable alternatives to Grafton with the same good properties. Further studies are necessary to clarify the efficacy of these allografts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49774062016-08-09 Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study Rokn, Amir Reza Shakeri, Abbas Seyed Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo Alaeddini, Mojgan Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Manasheof, Rebecca Barikani, Hamidreza J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to histologically compare the regenerative properties of two allografts manufactured by two Iranian companies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, four 8-mm defects were produced in the calvaria of 12 rabbits. In three defects, three types of allografts namely ITB, CenoBone and Grafton were placed and one defect served as control. Samples were prepared and histomorphometric evaluations were carried out after healing periods of four weeks (interval 1) and eight weeks (interval 2). Qualitative and quantities variables were compared and analyzed with SPSS software. RESULTS: Mild inflammation was observed in 45% and 12.5% of the samples in the first and second intervals, respectively. Foreign body reaction was observed in only 5% of the samples. The quality of regenerated bone was immature, mixed and lamellar in 54.5%, 15.9% and 4.5% of the samples, respectively. The rate of allograft resorption was the highest and lowest in the CenoBone and Grafton samples, respectively. The mean amount of regenerated bone was higher in areas containing Grafton; however, the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in the numerical values of bone regeneration, there were no statistically significant differences in bone generation among the material groups, and allografts manufactured in Iran can be suitable alternatives to Grafton with the same good properties. Further studies are necessary to clarify the efficacy of these allografts. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4977406/ /pubmed/27507993 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rokn, Amir Reza Shakeri, Abbas Seyed Etemad-Moghadam, Shahroo Alaeddini, Mojgan Shamshiri, Ahmad Reza Manasheof, Rebecca Barikani, Hamidreza Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title | Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title_full | Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title_fullStr | Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title_short | Regenerative Effects of Three Types of Allografts on Rabbit Calvarium: An Animal Study |
title_sort | regenerative effects of three types of allografts on rabbit calvarium: an animal study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507993 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roknamirreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT shakeriabbasseyed regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT etemadmoghadamshahroo regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT alaeddinimojgan regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT shamshiriahmadreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT manasheofrebecca regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy AT barikanihamidreza regenerativeeffectsofthreetypesofallograftsonrabbitcalvariumananimalstudy |