Cargando…

Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare apical sealing ability of alpha and beta phases of gutta-percha by means of bacterial leakage model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted human premolars were selected. The root canals were prepared with Mtwo rotary instruments up to apical #35....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emami, Raheleh, Khedmat, Sedigheh, Pirmoazen, Salma, Honardar, Kiamars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507995
_version_ 1782447023242346496
author Emami, Raheleh
Khedmat, Sedigheh
Pirmoazen, Salma
Honardar, Kiamars
author_facet Emami, Raheleh
Khedmat, Sedigheh
Pirmoazen, Salma
Honardar, Kiamars
author_sort Emami, Raheleh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare apical sealing ability of alpha and beta phases of gutta-percha by means of bacterial leakage model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted human premolars were selected. The root canals were prepared with Mtwo rotary instruments up to apical #35.04. Forty teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n= 20). The root canals were obturated by alpha phase (G1) and beta phase (G2) of gutta-percha and AH26 sealer, respectively, with warm vertical compaction technique. Ten teeth served as positive (n=8) and negative (n=2) control groups. Then, the specimens were sterilized with ethylene oxide gas. Bacterial suspension of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in 0.5 McFarland concentration was prepared. All teeth were mounted in plastic vial caps containing Muller Hinton broth and then exposed to bacterial suspension of E. faecalis every three days up to 31 days. The number of days required for the contamination of the entire root canals was recorded. The data were analyzed using Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in bacterial leakage between the G1 and G2 groups (P>0.05). Negative controls revealed no microbial leakage; whereas positive controls showed gross microbial leakage. CONCLUSION: Despite better thermal conduction and adaptability of alpha phase of guttapercha, our study revealed no significant difference in bacterial leakage between alpha and beta phases of gutta-percha in warm vertical compaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49774082016-08-09 Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model Emami, Raheleh Khedmat, Sedigheh Pirmoazen, Salma Honardar, Kiamars J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare apical sealing ability of alpha and beta phases of gutta-percha by means of bacterial leakage model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty single-rooted human premolars were selected. The root canals were prepared with Mtwo rotary instruments up to apical #35.04. Forty teeth were randomly divided into two groups (n= 20). The root canals were obturated by alpha phase (G1) and beta phase (G2) of gutta-percha and AH26 sealer, respectively, with warm vertical compaction technique. Ten teeth served as positive (n=8) and negative (n=2) control groups. Then, the specimens were sterilized with ethylene oxide gas. Bacterial suspension of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) in 0.5 McFarland concentration was prepared. All teeth were mounted in plastic vial caps containing Muller Hinton broth and then exposed to bacterial suspension of E. faecalis every three days up to 31 days. The number of days required for the contamination of the entire root canals was recorded. The data were analyzed using Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in bacterial leakage between the G1 and G2 groups (P>0.05). Negative controls revealed no microbial leakage; whereas positive controls showed gross microbial leakage. CONCLUSION: Despite better thermal conduction and adaptability of alpha phase of guttapercha, our study revealed no significant difference in bacterial leakage between alpha and beta phases of gutta-percha in warm vertical compaction. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4977408/ /pubmed/27507995 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Emami, Raheleh
Khedmat, Sedigheh
Pirmoazen, Salma
Honardar, Kiamars
Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title_full Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title_fullStr Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title_short Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Two Phases of Gutta–Percha: A Bacterial Leakage Model
title_sort comparison of apical sealing ability of two phases of gutta–percha: a bacterial leakage model
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507995
work_keys_str_mv AT emamiraheleh comparisonofapicalsealingabilityoftwophasesofguttaperchaabacterialleakagemodel
AT khedmatsedigheh comparisonofapicalsealingabilityoftwophasesofguttaperchaabacterialleakagemodel
AT pirmoazensalma comparisonofapicalsealingabilityoftwophasesofguttaperchaabacterialleakagemodel
AT honardarkiamars comparisonofapicalsealingabilityoftwophasesofguttaperchaabacterialleakagemodel