Cargando…
No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats
Frequency shifts in signals of bats flying near conspecifics have been interpreted as a spectral jamming avoidance response (JAR). However, several prerequisites supporting a JAR hypothesis have not been controlled for in previous studies. We recorded flight and echolocation behavior of foraging Pip...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30978 |
_version_ | 1782447042472181760 |
---|---|
author | Götze, Simone Koblitz, Jens C. Denzinger, Annette Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich |
author_facet | Götze, Simone Koblitz, Jens C. Denzinger, Annette Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich |
author_sort | Götze, Simone |
collection | PubMed |
description | Frequency shifts in signals of bats flying near conspecifics have been interpreted as a spectral jamming avoidance response (JAR). However, several prerequisites supporting a JAR hypothesis have not been controlled for in previous studies. We recorded flight and echolocation behavior of foraging Pipistrellus pipistrellus while flying alone and with a conspecific and tested whether frequency changes were due to a spectral JAR with an increased frequency difference, or whether changes could be explained by other reactions. P. pipistrellus reacted to conspecifics with a reduction of sound duration and often also pulse interval, accompanied by an increase in terminal frequency. This reaction is typical of behavioral situations where targets of interest have captured the bat’s attention and initiated a more detailed exploration. All observed frequency changes were predicted by the attention reaction alone, and do not support the JAR hypothesis of increased frequency separation. Reaction distances of 1–11 m suggest that the attention response may be elicited either by detection of the conspecific by short range active echolocation or by long range passive acoustic detection of echolocation calls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49775152016-08-22 No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats Götze, Simone Koblitz, Jens C. Denzinger, Annette Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich Sci Rep Article Frequency shifts in signals of bats flying near conspecifics have been interpreted as a spectral jamming avoidance response (JAR). However, several prerequisites supporting a JAR hypothesis have not been controlled for in previous studies. We recorded flight and echolocation behavior of foraging Pipistrellus pipistrellus while flying alone and with a conspecific and tested whether frequency changes were due to a spectral JAR with an increased frequency difference, or whether changes could be explained by other reactions. P. pipistrellus reacted to conspecifics with a reduction of sound duration and often also pulse interval, accompanied by an increase in terminal frequency. This reaction is typical of behavioral situations where targets of interest have captured the bat’s attention and initiated a more detailed exploration. All observed frequency changes were predicted by the attention reaction alone, and do not support the JAR hypothesis of increased frequency separation. Reaction distances of 1–11 m suggest that the attention response may be elicited either by detection of the conspecific by short range active echolocation or by long range passive acoustic detection of echolocation calls. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4977515/ /pubmed/27502900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30978 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Götze, Simone Koblitz, Jens C. Denzinger, Annette Schnitzler, Hans-Ulrich No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title | No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title_full | No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title_fullStr | No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title_full_unstemmed | No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title_short | No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
title_sort | no evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gotzesimone noevidenceforspectraljammingavoidanceinecholocationbehaviorofforagingpipistrellebats AT koblitzjensc noevidenceforspectraljammingavoidanceinecholocationbehaviorofforagingpipistrellebats AT denzingerannette noevidenceforspectraljammingavoidanceinecholocationbehaviorofforagingpipistrellebats AT schnitzlerhansulrich noevidenceforspectraljammingavoidanceinecholocationbehaviorofforagingpipistrellebats |