Cargando…

Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Sue, Brazil, Debbie, Teh, William, Duffy, Stephen W, Myles, Jonathan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937
_version_ 1782447059726499840
author Hudson, Sue
Brazil, Debbie
Teh, William
Duffy, Stephen W
Myles, Jonathan P
author_facet Hudson, Sue
Brazil, Debbie
Teh, William
Duffy, Stephen W
Myles, Jonathan P
author_sort Hudson, Sue
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response to the initial invitation and the normal open invitation sent to non-attenders. A comparison group was sent a four-month delayed additional open invitation. RESULTS: Response to the second timed appointments (percentage of re-invited women eventually attending in this episode) was 20%, corresponding to an estimated increase on total uptake of 6%. Response was highest in women who had previously attended screens. Response in the women offered an additional delayed open invitation was 7.5%, corresponding to an estimated 2.3% increase in overall uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Second timed appointments were almost three times as effective as additional open invitation. They should be targeted at women most likely to attend. A randomized study of second timed appointments versus open invitations should be conducted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49776072016-08-17 Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening Hudson, Sue Brazil, Debbie Teh, William Duffy, Stephen W Myles, Jonathan P J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response to the initial invitation and the normal open invitation sent to non-attenders. A comparison group was sent a four-month delayed additional open invitation. RESULTS: Response to the second timed appointments (percentage of re-invited women eventually attending in this episode) was 20%, corresponding to an estimated increase on total uptake of 6%. Response was highest in women who had previously attended screens. Response in the women offered an additional delayed open invitation was 7.5%, corresponding to an estimated 2.3% increase in overall uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Second timed appointments were almost three times as effective as additional open invitation. They should be targeted at women most likely to attend. A randomized study of second timed appointments versus open invitations should be conducted. SAGE Publications 2016-03-02 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4977607/ /pubmed/26940961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hudson, Sue
Brazil, Debbie
Teh, William
Duffy, Stephen W
Myles, Jonathan P
Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title_full Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title_fullStr Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title_short Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
title_sort effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonsue effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening
AT brazildebbie effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening
AT tehwilliam effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening
AT duffystephenw effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening
AT mylesjonathanp effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening