Cargando…
Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937 |
_version_ | 1782447059726499840 |
---|---|
author | Hudson, Sue Brazil, Debbie Teh, William Duffy, Stephen W Myles, Jonathan P |
author_facet | Hudson, Sue Brazil, Debbie Teh, William Duffy, Stephen W Myles, Jonathan P |
author_sort | Hudson, Sue |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response to the initial invitation and the normal open invitation sent to non-attenders. A comparison group was sent a four-month delayed additional open invitation. RESULTS: Response to the second timed appointments (percentage of re-invited women eventually attending in this episode) was 20%, corresponding to an estimated increase on total uptake of 6%. Response was highest in women who had previously attended screens. Response in the women offered an additional delayed open invitation was 7.5%, corresponding to an estimated 2.3% increase in overall uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Second timed appointments were almost three times as effective as additional open invitation. They should be targeted at women most likely to attend. A randomized study of second timed appointments versus open invitations should be conducted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49776072016-08-17 Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening Hudson, Sue Brazil, Debbie Teh, William Duffy, Stephen W Myles, Jonathan P J Med Screen Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To estimate the effect on breast screening uptake of delayed, targeted, second timed appointments in women who did not take up an initial breast cancer screening appointment offer. METHODS: Non-attending women received a four-month delayed second timed appointment following non-response to the initial invitation and the normal open invitation sent to non-attenders. A comparison group was sent a four-month delayed additional open invitation. RESULTS: Response to the second timed appointments (percentage of re-invited women eventually attending in this episode) was 20%, corresponding to an estimated increase on total uptake of 6%. Response was highest in women who had previously attended screens. Response in the women offered an additional delayed open invitation was 7.5%, corresponding to an estimated 2.3% increase in overall uptake. CONCLUSIONS: Second timed appointments were almost three times as effective as additional open invitation. They should be targeted at women most likely to attend. A randomized study of second timed appointments versus open invitations should be conducted. SAGE Publications 2016-03-02 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4977607/ /pubmed/26940961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Hudson, Sue Brazil, Debbie Teh, William Duffy, Stephen W Myles, Jonathan P Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title | Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title_full | Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title_short | Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
title_sort | effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26940961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969141315624937 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hudsonsue effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening AT brazildebbie effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening AT tehwilliam effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening AT duffystephenw effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening AT mylesjonathanp effectivenessoftimedandnontimedsecondappointmentsinimprovinguptakeinbreastcancerscreening |