Cargando…
Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3 |
_version_ | 1782447063934435328 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Zhenya Medeiros, L. Jeffrey Yin, C. Cameron Wang, Wei Lu, Xinyan Young, Ken H. Khoury, Joseph D. Tang, Guilin |
author_facet | Tang, Zhenya Medeiros, L. Jeffrey Yin, C. Cameron Wang, Wei Lu, Xinyan Young, Ken H. Khoury, Joseph D. Tang, Guilin |
author_sort | Tang, Zhenya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone and its clinical significance remains unknown. RESULTS: We present 12 cases with SCL who underwent alloHSCT; 9 patients (4 men and 5 women with a median age of 56 years) developed isolated SCL after alloHSCT (Group I), and 3 patients (all women with a median age of 58 years) had a SCL before undergoing alloHSCT after which SCL disappeared (Group II). The primary neoplasms included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 5), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 5), chronic myelogenous leukemia with nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n = 1) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1). According to the donor/recipient relationship, their alloHSCT can be divided into sex-matched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 2); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 4); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-identical and 2 HLA-haploidentical cases) and sex-matched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-haploidentical cases). In Group I, isolated SCL was first detected with a median interval of 3 months (range 1 to 42 months) after the alloHSCT. By the end of clinical follow-up in patients in Group I, 7 patients expired with a median overall survival of 45 months (range 3 to 108 months) after alloHSCT and 33 months (range 0 to 66 months) after SCL detection. In Group II, 1 patient expired with a survival time of 54 months after the alloHSCT. Detection of SCL after alloHSCT can be transient, intermittent or persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of SCL is challenging in the context of alloHSCT. Chimerism testing is useful in determining the origin of SCL. In the case of SCL with donor/recipient chimerism, deduction of the SCL origin by all means and use of “–?X” or “–?Y” in the ISCN nomenclature are recommended. Clinical follow-up with closely monitoring the SCL by both cytogenetic and molecular analyses is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4977628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49776282016-08-10 Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists Tang, Zhenya Medeiros, L. Jeffrey Yin, C. Cameron Wang, Wei Lu, Xinyan Young, Ken H. Khoury, Joseph D. Tang, Guilin Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone and its clinical significance remains unknown. RESULTS: We present 12 cases with SCL who underwent alloHSCT; 9 patients (4 men and 5 women with a median age of 56 years) developed isolated SCL after alloHSCT (Group I), and 3 patients (all women with a median age of 58 years) had a SCL before undergoing alloHSCT after which SCL disappeared (Group II). The primary neoplasms included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 5), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 5), chronic myelogenous leukemia with nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n = 1) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1). According to the donor/recipient relationship, their alloHSCT can be divided into sex-matched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 2); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 4); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-identical and 2 HLA-haploidentical cases) and sex-matched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-haploidentical cases). In Group I, isolated SCL was first detected with a median interval of 3 months (range 1 to 42 months) after the alloHSCT. By the end of clinical follow-up in patients in Group I, 7 patients expired with a median overall survival of 45 months (range 3 to 108 months) after alloHSCT and 33 months (range 0 to 66 months) after SCL detection. In Group II, 1 patient expired with a survival time of 54 months after the alloHSCT. Detection of SCL after alloHSCT can be transient, intermittent or persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of SCL is challenging in the context of alloHSCT. Chimerism testing is useful in determining the origin of SCL. In the case of SCL with donor/recipient chimerism, deduction of the SCL origin by all means and use of “–?X” or “–?Y” in the ISCN nomenclature are recommended. Clinical follow-up with closely monitoring the SCL by both cytogenetic and molecular analyses is needed. BioMed Central 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4977628/ /pubmed/27508005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Tang, Zhenya Medeiros, L. Jeffrey Yin, C. Cameron Wang, Wei Lu, Xinyan Young, Ken H. Khoury, Joseph D. Tang, Guilin Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title | Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title_full | Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title_fullStr | Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title_full_unstemmed | Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title_short | Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
title_sort | sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangzhenya sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT medeirosljeffrey sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT yinccameron sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT wangwei sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT luxinyan sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT youngkenh sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT khouryjosephd sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists AT tangguilin sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists |