Cargando…

Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists

BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Zhenya, Medeiros, L. Jeffrey, Yin, C. Cameron, Wang, Wei, Lu, Xinyan, Young, Ken H., Khoury, Joseph D., Tang, Guilin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3
_version_ 1782447063934435328
author Tang, Zhenya
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey
Yin, C. Cameron
Wang, Wei
Lu, Xinyan
Young, Ken H.
Khoury, Joseph D.
Tang, Guilin
author_facet Tang, Zhenya
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey
Yin, C. Cameron
Wang, Wei
Lu, Xinyan
Young, Ken H.
Khoury, Joseph D.
Tang, Guilin
author_sort Tang, Zhenya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone and its clinical significance remains unknown. RESULTS: We present 12 cases with SCL who underwent alloHSCT; 9 patients (4 men and 5 women with a median age of 56 years) developed isolated SCL after alloHSCT (Group I), and 3 patients (all women with a median age of 58 years) had a SCL before undergoing alloHSCT after which SCL disappeared (Group II). The primary neoplasms included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 5), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 5), chronic myelogenous leukemia with nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n = 1) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1). According to the donor/recipient relationship, their alloHSCT can be divided into sex-matched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 2); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 4); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-identical and 2 HLA-haploidentical cases) and sex-matched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-haploidentical cases). In Group I, isolated SCL was first detected with a median interval of 3 months (range 1 to 42 months) after the alloHSCT. By the end of clinical follow-up in patients in Group I, 7 patients expired with a median overall survival of 45 months (range 3 to 108 months) after alloHSCT and 33 months (range 0 to 66 months) after SCL detection. In Group II, 1 patient expired with a survival time of 54 months after the alloHSCT. Detection of SCL after alloHSCT can be transient, intermittent or persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of SCL is challenging in the context of alloHSCT. Chimerism testing is useful in determining the origin of SCL. In the case of SCL with donor/recipient chimerism, deduction of the SCL origin by all means and use of “–?X” or “–?Y” in the ISCN nomenclature are recommended. Clinical follow-up with closely monitoring the SCL by both cytogenetic and molecular analyses is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49776282016-08-10 Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists Tang, Zhenya Medeiros, L. Jeffrey Yin, C. Cameron Wang, Wei Lu, Xinyan Young, Ken H. Khoury, Joseph D. Tang, Guilin Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Sex chromosome loss (SCL), including loss of an X chromosome (-X) in females and loss of the Y chromosome (-Y) in males, resulting in a karyotype of 45,X, rarely occurs in patients post an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT). However, origin of this abnormal clone and its clinical significance remains unknown. RESULTS: We present 12 cases with SCL who underwent alloHSCT; 9 patients (4 men and 5 women with a median age of 56 years) developed isolated SCL after alloHSCT (Group I), and 3 patients (all women with a median age of 58 years) had a SCL before undergoing alloHSCT after which SCL disappeared (Group II). The primary neoplasms included chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 5), acute myeloid leukemia (n = 5), chronic myelogenous leukemia with nodal marginal zone lymphoma (n = 1) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 1). According to the donor/recipient relationship, their alloHSCT can be divided into sex-matched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 2); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, unrelated donors (n = 4); sex-mismatched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-identical and 2 HLA-haploidentical cases) and sex-matched, HLA-matched, related donors (2 HLA-haploidentical cases). In Group I, isolated SCL was first detected with a median interval of 3 months (range 1 to 42 months) after the alloHSCT. By the end of clinical follow-up in patients in Group I, 7 patients expired with a median overall survival of 45 months (range 3 to 108 months) after alloHSCT and 33 months (range 0 to 66 months) after SCL detection. In Group II, 1 patient expired with a survival time of 54 months after the alloHSCT. Detection of SCL after alloHSCT can be transient, intermittent or persistent. CONCLUSIONS: Interpretation of SCL is challenging in the context of alloHSCT. Chimerism testing is useful in determining the origin of SCL. In the case of SCL with donor/recipient chimerism, deduction of the SCL origin by all means and use of “–?X” or “–?Y” in the ISCN nomenclature are recommended. Clinical follow-up with closely monitoring the SCL by both cytogenetic and molecular analyses is needed. BioMed Central 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4977628/ /pubmed/27508005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tang, Zhenya
Medeiros, L. Jeffrey
Yin, C. Cameron
Wang, Wei
Lu, Xinyan
Young, Ken H.
Khoury, Joseph D.
Tang, Guilin
Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title_full Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title_fullStr Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title_full_unstemmed Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title_short Sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
title_sort sex chromosome loss after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant in patients with hematologic neoplasms: a diagnostic dilemma for clinical cytogeneticists
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-016-0275-3
work_keys_str_mv AT tangzhenya sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT medeirosljeffrey sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT yinccameron sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT wangwei sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT luxinyan sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT youngkenh sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT khouryjosephd sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists
AT tangguilin sexchromosomelossafterallogeneichematopoieticstemcelltransplantinpatientswithhematologicneoplasmsadiagnosticdilemmaforclinicalcytogeneticists