Cargando…

Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are a growing cause of sickness absence. There are programmes in many countries to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. In Norway, there has been some controversy about patients on sick-leave being prioritized over other patient groups, such as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Victor, Mattias, Lau, Bjørn, Ruud, Torleif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3431-0
_version_ 1782447070041341952
author Victor, Mattias
Lau, Bjørn
Ruud, Torleif
author_facet Victor, Mattias
Lau, Bjørn
Ruud, Torleif
author_sort Victor, Mattias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are a growing cause of sickness absence. There are programmes in many countries to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. In Norway, there has been some controversy about patients on sick-leave being prioritized over other patient groups, such as those with more severe diagnoses. However, it is not clear whether patients in RTW programmes actually do differ from patients in regular services. METHODS: This study compared 270 patients treated in an RTW outpatient clinic and 86 patients treated in a regular outpatient clinic, both in specialized mental health care, on patient characteristics, history of treatment and mental health status. Analyses of differences between groups were done by ANOVA tests, chi-square test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients in the RTW clinic had lower scores on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). There was no difference in health-related quality of life. RTW patients were somewhat older and more likely to live in relationships and have children, and they had higher incomes. Work participation, previous psychiatric hospitalization and present diagnosis contributed uniquely to an explanation of which patients were included in the respective clinics. The RTW clinic seems to reach its intended target group. Almost all of the patients in this group participated in the work arena, and their psychopathologies were clearly dominated by common mental disorders. Most RTW patients’ general practitioners had followed them fairly closely in the year before referral, suggesting previous attempts at treatment in primary care settings. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to outpatients in a specialized mental health care setting, RTW patients had lower symptoms, but still in the same moderate range of severity. They suffered the same reduction in quality of life. Almost all of the RTW patients were diagnosed with illnesses that can be treated effectively, about half of them had recurring mental health problems and many of them had been treated in primary care settings before referral. These findings indicate that this group has significant health problems that can benefit from treatment in specialized health care settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49776552016-08-10 Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study Victor, Mattias Lau, Bjørn Ruud, Torleif BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Mental health problems are a growing cause of sickness absence. There are programmes in many countries to facilitate return to work (RTW) after sickness absence. In Norway, there has been some controversy about patients on sick-leave being prioritized over other patient groups, such as those with more severe diagnoses. However, it is not clear whether patients in RTW programmes actually do differ from patients in regular services. METHODS: This study compared 270 patients treated in an RTW outpatient clinic and 86 patients treated in a regular outpatient clinic, both in specialized mental health care, on patient characteristics, history of treatment and mental health status. Analyses of differences between groups were done by ANOVA tests, chi-square test and logistic regression. RESULTS: Patients in the RTW clinic had lower scores on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). There was no difference in health-related quality of life. RTW patients were somewhat older and more likely to live in relationships and have children, and they had higher incomes. Work participation, previous psychiatric hospitalization and present diagnosis contributed uniquely to an explanation of which patients were included in the respective clinics. The RTW clinic seems to reach its intended target group. Almost all of the patients in this group participated in the work arena, and their psychopathologies were clearly dominated by common mental disorders. Most RTW patients’ general practitioners had followed them fairly closely in the year before referral, suggesting previous attempts at treatment in primary care settings. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to outpatients in a specialized mental health care setting, RTW patients had lower symptoms, but still in the same moderate range of severity. They suffered the same reduction in quality of life. Almost all of the RTW patients were diagnosed with illnesses that can be treated effectively, about half of them had recurring mental health problems and many of them had been treated in primary care settings before referral. These findings indicate that this group has significant health problems that can benefit from treatment in specialized health care settings. BioMed Central 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4977655/ /pubmed/27502950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3431-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Victor, Mattias
Lau, Bjørn
Ruud, Torleif
Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_full Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_short Patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
title_sort patient characteristics in a return to work programme for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27502950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3431-0
work_keys_str_mv AT victormattias patientcharacteristicsinareturntoworkprogrammeforcommonmentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudy
AT laubjørn patientcharacteristicsinareturntoworkprogrammeforcommonmentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudy
AT ruudtorleif patientcharacteristicsinareturntoworkprogrammeforcommonmentaldisordersacrosssectionalstudy