Cargando…

Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a valid option for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high perioperative risk, particularly in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Several patients with previous mitral valve surgery were reported to have be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wachter, Kristina, Ahad, Samir, Rustenbach, Christian J., Franke, Ulrich F. W., Baumbach, Hardy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0521-0
_version_ 1782447079047561216
author Wachter, Kristina
Ahad, Samir
Rustenbach, Christian J.
Franke, Ulrich F. W.
Baumbach, Hardy
author_facet Wachter, Kristina
Ahad, Samir
Rustenbach, Christian J.
Franke, Ulrich F. W.
Baumbach, Hardy
author_sort Wachter, Kristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a valid option for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high perioperative risk, particularly in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Several patients with previous mitral valve surgery were reported to have been successfully treated with TAVI. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients, one with mechanical and one with biological mitral valve prosthesis, presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. After discussion among our multidisciplinary heart team transapical approach and a JenaValve™ prosthesis was used for TAVI. Main reasons were to decrease the perioperative risk, avoid a re-opening of the chest via median sternotomy, and discuss the possible superiority of the JenaValve™ device due to its design. The patients were successfully treated and discharged on the 11th and 14th post-operative day, respectively. Echocardiographic follow up before discharge and up to 2.8 years post-operatively showed excellent results. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TAVI in patients with preexisting mitral prostheses-mechanical or biological-is feasible, safe, and effective and offers a valid alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement in this particular re-operation scenario. The JenaValve™ device does not interact with the mitral prosthesis and offers therefore due to its unique design a potential advantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4977695
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49776952016-08-10 Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report Wachter, Kristina Ahad, Samir Rustenbach, Christian J. Franke, Ulrich F. W. Baumbach, Hardy J Cardiothorac Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a valid option for patients with severe aortic stenosis who are at high perioperative risk, particularly in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Several patients with previous mitral valve surgery were reported to have been successfully treated with TAVI. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients, one with mechanical and one with biological mitral valve prosthesis, presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. After discussion among our multidisciplinary heart team transapical approach and a JenaValve™ prosthesis was used for TAVI. Main reasons were to decrease the perioperative risk, avoid a re-opening of the chest via median sternotomy, and discuss the possible superiority of the JenaValve™ device due to its design. The patients were successfully treated and discharged on the 11th and 14th post-operative day, respectively. Echocardiographic follow up before discharge and up to 2.8 years post-operatively showed excellent results. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, TAVI in patients with preexisting mitral prostheses-mechanical or biological-is feasible, safe, and effective and offers a valid alternative to conventional aortic valve replacement in this particular re-operation scenario. The JenaValve™ device does not interact with the mitral prosthesis and offers therefore due to its unique design a potential advantage. BioMed Central 2016-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4977695/ /pubmed/27503339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0521-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Wachter, Kristina
Ahad, Samir
Rustenbach, Christian J.
Franke, Ulrich F. W.
Baumbach, Hardy
Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title_full Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title_fullStr Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title_full_unstemmed Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title_short Transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
title_sort transapical aortic valve implantation in patients with pre-existing mitral valve prostheses: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4977695/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0521-0
work_keys_str_mv AT wachterkristina transapicalaorticvalveimplantationinpatientswithpreexistingmitralvalveprosthesesacasereport
AT ahadsamir transapicalaorticvalveimplantationinpatientswithpreexistingmitralvalveprosthesesacasereport
AT rustenbachchristianj transapicalaorticvalveimplantationinpatientswithpreexistingmitralvalveprosthesesacasereport
AT frankeulrichfw transapicalaorticvalveimplantationinpatientswithpreexistingmitralvalveprosthesesacasereport
AT baumbachhardy transapicalaorticvalveimplantationinpatientswithpreexistingmitralvalveprosthesesacasereport