Cargando…

Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation

The objectives of this study were to examine the diagnostic accuracy of pain drawing (PD) in determining the level of involvement and to investigate how the quantitative evaluation results of PD using a grid score (GS) correlates with the results of other clinical evaluation measures in diagnosis an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tachibana, Toshiya, Maruo, Keishi, Inoue, Shinichi, Arizumi, Fumihiro, Kusuyama, Kazuki, Yoshiya, Shinichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2981-z
_version_ 1782447199643238400
author Tachibana, Toshiya
Maruo, Keishi
Inoue, Shinichi
Arizumi, Fumihiro
Kusuyama, Kazuki
Yoshiya, Shinichi
author_facet Tachibana, Toshiya
Maruo, Keishi
Inoue, Shinichi
Arizumi, Fumihiro
Kusuyama, Kazuki
Yoshiya, Shinichi
author_sort Tachibana, Toshiya
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this study were to examine the diagnostic accuracy of pain drawing (PD) in determining the level of involvement and to investigate how the quantitative evaluation results of PD using a grid score (GS) correlates with the results of other clinical evaluation measures in diagnosis and assessment of patients with lumber disc herniation (LDH) involving a single nerve root. Thirty-one patients with single level LDH who were diagnosed and conservatively treated by the first author constituted the study population. In order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PD, the level of involvement as determined by PD was compared to the final diagnosis. In 26 of the 31 patients who could be followed for more than 6 months of conservative treatment, the GS in PD evaluation was compared to the score assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for low back pain (JOA score) and the visual analog scale (VAS) both before and after the treatment. The overall diagnostic accuracy of PD for the determination of the affected level averaged 68.8 %, and the accuracy was higher at the L4/5 and L5/S levels than the L2/3 and L3/4 levels. The average values of VAS and GS significantly decreased and the JOA score significantly improved after the treatment. Moreover, a significant correlation was demonstrated between the scores derived from these three evaluation measures. The present study indicated the potential usefulness of PD in clinical assessment during the treatment course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4978648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49786482016-08-19 Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation Tachibana, Toshiya Maruo, Keishi Inoue, Shinichi Arizumi, Fumihiro Kusuyama, Kazuki Yoshiya, Shinichi Springerplus Research The objectives of this study were to examine the diagnostic accuracy of pain drawing (PD) in determining the level of involvement and to investigate how the quantitative evaluation results of PD using a grid score (GS) correlates with the results of other clinical evaluation measures in diagnosis and assessment of patients with lumber disc herniation (LDH) involving a single nerve root. Thirty-one patients with single level LDH who were diagnosed and conservatively treated by the first author constituted the study population. In order to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PD, the level of involvement as determined by PD was compared to the final diagnosis. In 26 of the 31 patients who could be followed for more than 6 months of conservative treatment, the GS in PD evaluation was compared to the score assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for low back pain (JOA score) and the visual analog scale (VAS) both before and after the treatment. The overall diagnostic accuracy of PD for the determination of the affected level averaged 68.8 %, and the accuracy was higher at the L4/5 and L5/S levels than the L2/3 and L3/4 levels. The average values of VAS and GS significantly decreased and the JOA score significantly improved after the treatment. Moreover, a significant correlation was demonstrated between the scores derived from these three evaluation measures. The present study indicated the potential usefulness of PD in clinical assessment during the treatment course. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4978648/ /pubmed/27547686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2981-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Tachibana, Toshiya
Maruo, Keishi
Inoue, Shinichi
Arizumi, Fumihiro
Kusuyama, Kazuki
Yoshiya, Shinichi
Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title_full Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title_fullStr Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title_full_unstemmed Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title_short Use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
title_sort use of pain drawing as an assessment tool of sciatica for patients with single level lumbar disc herniation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2981-z
work_keys_str_mv AT tachibanatoshiya useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT maruokeishi useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT inoueshinichi useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT arizumifumihiro useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT kusuyamakazuki useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT yoshiyashinichi useofpaindrawingasanassessmenttoolofsciaticaforpatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation