Cargando…

Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MRI. METHODS: In phantom study, we scanned a phantom and obtained images by conventional means (P1 images), by partial-Fourier image reconstruction (PF, P2 images) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Shinichi, Nakaura, Takeshi, Kidoh, Masafumi, Awai, Kazuo, Namimoto, Tomohiro, Yoshinaka, Ichiro, Harada, Kazunori, Yamashita, Yasuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2968-9
_version_ 1782447200096223232
author Nakamura, Shinichi
Nakaura, Takeshi
Kidoh, Masafumi
Awai, Kazuo
Namimoto, Tomohiro
Yoshinaka, Ichiro
Harada, Kazunori
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
author_facet Nakamura, Shinichi
Nakaura, Takeshi
Kidoh, Masafumi
Awai, Kazuo
Namimoto, Tomohiro
Yoshinaka, Ichiro
Harada, Kazunori
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
author_sort Nakamura, Shinichi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MRI. METHODS: In phantom study, we scanned a phantom and obtained images by conventional means (P1 images), by partial-Fourier image reconstruction (PF, P2 images) and by PF with the POCS algorithm (P3 images). Then we acquired and compared subtraction images (P2–P1 images and P3–P1 images). In clinical study, 55 consecutive patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB)-enhanced 3D hepatobiliary-phase MRI on a 1.5T scanner. Images were obtained using conventional method (C1 images), PF (C2 images), and PF with POCS (C3 images). The acquisition time was 17-, 14-, and 14 s for protocols C1, C2 and C3, respectively. Two radiologists assigned grades for hepatic vessel sharpness and we compared the visual grading among the 3 protocols. And one radiologist compared signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of the hepatic parenchyma. RESULTS: In phantom study, there was no difference in signal intensity on a peripheral phantom column on P3–P1 images. In clinical study, there was no significant difference between C1 and C3 images (2.62 ± 0.49 vs. 2.58 ± 0.49, p = 0.70) in the score assigned for vessel sharpness nor in SNR (13.3 ± 2.67 vs. 13.1 ± 2.51, p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: The POCS algorithm makes it possible to reduce the scan time of hepatobiliary phase (from 17 to 14 s) without reducing SNR and without increasing artifacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4978650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49786502016-08-19 Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI Nakamura, Shinichi Nakaura, Takeshi Kidoh, Masafumi Awai, Kazuo Namimoto, Tomohiro Yoshinaka, Ichiro Harada, Kazunori Yamashita, Yasuyuki Springerplus Research PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MRI. METHODS: In phantom study, we scanned a phantom and obtained images by conventional means (P1 images), by partial-Fourier image reconstruction (PF, P2 images) and by PF with the POCS algorithm (P3 images). Then we acquired and compared subtraction images (P2–P1 images and P3–P1 images). In clinical study, 55 consecutive patients underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA (EOB)-enhanced 3D hepatobiliary-phase MRI on a 1.5T scanner. Images were obtained using conventional method (C1 images), PF (C2 images), and PF with POCS (C3 images). The acquisition time was 17-, 14-, and 14 s for protocols C1, C2 and C3, respectively. Two radiologists assigned grades for hepatic vessel sharpness and we compared the visual grading among the 3 protocols. And one radiologist compared signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) of the hepatic parenchyma. RESULTS: In phantom study, there was no difference in signal intensity on a peripheral phantom column on P3–P1 images. In clinical study, there was no significant difference between C1 and C3 images (2.62 ± 0.49 vs. 2.58 ± 0.49, p = 0.70) in the score assigned for vessel sharpness nor in SNR (13.3 ± 2.67 vs. 13.1 ± 2.51, p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: The POCS algorithm makes it possible to reduce the scan time of hepatobiliary phase (from 17 to 14 s) without reducing SNR and without increasing artifacts. Springer International Publishing 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4978650/ /pubmed/27547685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2968-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Nakamura, Shinichi
Nakaura, Takeshi
Kidoh, Masafumi
Awai, Kazuo
Namimoto, Tomohiro
Yoshinaka, Ichiro
Harada, Kazunori
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title_full Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title_fullStr Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title_short Efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (POCS) algorithm at Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic MRI
title_sort efficacy of the projection onto convex sets (pocs) algorithm at gd-eob-dtpa-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase hepatic mri
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2968-9
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamurashinichi efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT nakauratakeshi efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT kidohmasafumi efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT awaikazuo efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT namimototomohiro efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT yoshinakaichiro efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT haradakazunori efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri
AT yamashitayasuyuki efficacyoftheprojectionontoconvexsetspocsalgorithmatgdeobdtpaenhancedhepatobiliaryphasehepaticmri