Cargando…
Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review
BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health concern. Mobile apps for weight loss/management are found to be effective for improving health outcomes in adults and adolescents, and are pursued as a cost-effective and scalable intervention for combating overweight and obesity. In recent years, th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5115 |
_version_ | 1782447230882414592 |
---|---|
author | Rivera, Jordan McPherson, Amy Hamilton, Jill Birken, Catherine Coons, Michael Iyer, Sindoora Agarwal, Arnav Lalloo, Chitra Stinson, Jennifer |
author_facet | Rivera, Jordan McPherson, Amy Hamilton, Jill Birken, Catherine Coons, Michael Iyer, Sindoora Agarwal, Arnav Lalloo, Chitra Stinson, Jennifer |
author_sort | Rivera, Jordan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health concern. Mobile apps for weight loss/management are found to be effective for improving health outcomes in adults and adolescents, and are pursued as a cost-effective and scalable intervention for combating overweight and obesity. In recent years, the commercial market for ‘weight loss apps’ has expanded at rapid pace, yet little is known regarding the evidence-based quality of these tools for weight control. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the inclusion of evidence-based strategies, health care expert involvement, and scientific evaluation of commercial mobile apps for weight loss/management. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted between July 2014 and July 2015 of the official app stores for four major mobile operating systems. Three raters independently identified apps with a stated goal of weight loss/management, as well as weight loss/management apps targeted to pediatric users. All discrepancies regarding selection were resolved through discussion with a fourth rater. Metadata from all included apps were abstracted into a standard assessment criteria form and the evidence-based strategies, health care expert involvement, and scientific evaluation of included apps was assessed. Evidence-based strategies included: self-monitoring, goal-setting, physical activity support, healthy eating support, weight and/or health assessment, personalized feedback, motivational strategies, and social support. RESULTS: A total of 393 apps were included in this review. Self-monitoring was most common (139/393, 35.3%), followed by physical activity support (108/393, 27.5%), weight assessment (100/393, 25.4%), healthy eating support (91/393, 23.2%), goal-setting (84/393, 21.4%), motivational strategies (28/393, 7.1%), social support (21/393, 5.3%), and personalized feedback (7/393, 1.8%). Of apps, 0.8% (3/393) underwent scientific evaluation and 0.3% (1/393) reported health care expert involvement. No apps were comprehensive in the assessment criteria, with the majority of apps meeting less than two criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial mobile apps for weight loss/management lack important evidence-based features, do not involve health care experts in their development process, and have not undergone rigorous scientific testing. This calls into question the validity of apps’ claims regarding their effectiveness and safety, at a time when the availability and growth in adoption of these tools is rapidly increasing. Collaborative efforts between developers, researchers, clinicians, and patients are needed to develop and test high-quality, evidence-based mobile apps for weight loss/management before they are widely disseminated in commercial markets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4978862 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49788622016-08-29 Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review Rivera, Jordan McPherson, Amy Hamilton, Jill Birken, Catherine Coons, Michael Iyer, Sindoora Agarwal, Arnav Lalloo, Chitra Stinson, Jennifer JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Obesity remains a major public health concern. Mobile apps for weight loss/management are found to be effective for improving health outcomes in adults and adolescents, and are pursued as a cost-effective and scalable intervention for combating overweight and obesity. In recent years, the commercial market for ‘weight loss apps’ has expanded at rapid pace, yet little is known regarding the evidence-based quality of these tools for weight control. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the inclusion of evidence-based strategies, health care expert involvement, and scientific evaluation of commercial mobile apps for weight loss/management. METHODS: An electronic search was conducted between July 2014 and July 2015 of the official app stores for four major mobile operating systems. Three raters independently identified apps with a stated goal of weight loss/management, as well as weight loss/management apps targeted to pediatric users. All discrepancies regarding selection were resolved through discussion with a fourth rater. Metadata from all included apps were abstracted into a standard assessment criteria form and the evidence-based strategies, health care expert involvement, and scientific evaluation of included apps was assessed. Evidence-based strategies included: self-monitoring, goal-setting, physical activity support, healthy eating support, weight and/or health assessment, personalized feedback, motivational strategies, and social support. RESULTS: A total of 393 apps were included in this review. Self-monitoring was most common (139/393, 35.3%), followed by physical activity support (108/393, 27.5%), weight assessment (100/393, 25.4%), healthy eating support (91/393, 23.2%), goal-setting (84/393, 21.4%), motivational strategies (28/393, 7.1%), social support (21/393, 5.3%), and personalized feedback (7/393, 1.8%). Of apps, 0.8% (3/393) underwent scientific evaluation and 0.3% (1/393) reported health care expert involvement. No apps were comprehensive in the assessment criteria, with the majority of apps meeting less than two criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Commercial mobile apps for weight loss/management lack important evidence-based features, do not involve health care experts in their development process, and have not undergone rigorous scientific testing. This calls into question the validity of apps’ claims regarding their effectiveness and safety, at a time when the availability and growth in adoption of these tools is rapidly increasing. Collaborative efforts between developers, researchers, clinicians, and patients are needed to develop and test high-quality, evidence-based mobile apps for weight loss/management before they are widely disseminated in commercial markets. JMIR Publications 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4978862/ /pubmed/27460502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5115 Text en ©Jordan Rivera, Amy McPherson, Jill Hamilton, Catherine Birken, Michael Coons, Sindoora Iyer, Arnav Agarwal, Chitra Lalloo, Jennifer Stinson. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 26.07.2016. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Rivera, Jordan McPherson, Amy Hamilton, Jill Birken, Catherine Coons, Michael Iyer, Sindoora Agarwal, Arnav Lalloo, Chitra Stinson, Jennifer Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title | Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | mobile apps for weight management: a scoping review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978862/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27460502 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5115 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riverajordan mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT mcphersonamy mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT hamiltonjill mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT birkencatherine mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT coonsmichael mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT iyersindoora mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT agarwalarnav mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT lalloochitra mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview AT stinsonjennifer mobileappsforweightmanagementascopingreview |