Cargando…
The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahaf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291 |
_version_ | 1782447247338766336 |
---|---|
author | Nesbitt, Robin C. Lohela, Terhi J. Soremekun, Seyi Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Okyere, Eunice Grundy, Chris Amenga-Etego, Seeba Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R. Gabrysch, Sabine |
author_facet | Nesbitt, Robin C. Lohela, Terhi J. Soremekun, Seyi Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Okyere, Eunice Grundy, Chris Amenga-Etego, Seeba Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R. Gabrysch, Sabine |
author_sort | Nesbitt, Robin C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of care data from all 64 delivery facilities in the study area. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression to assess the influence of distance and several quality dimensions on place of delivery. Women lived a median of 3.3 km from the closest delivery facility, and 58% delivered in a facility. The probability of facility delivery ranged from 68% among women living 1 km from their closest facility to 22% among those living 25 km away, adjusted for confounders. Measured quality of care at the closest facility was not associated with use, except that facility delivery was lower when the closest facility provided substandard care on the EmOC dimension. These results do not imply, however, that we should increase geographic accessibility of care without improving facility quality. While this may be successful in increasing facility deliveries, such care cannot be expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4978958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49789582016-08-18 The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana Nesbitt, Robin C. Lohela, Terhi J. Soremekun, Seyi Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Okyere, Eunice Grundy, Chris Amenga-Etego, Seeba Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R. Gabrysch, Sabine Sci Rep Article Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of care data from all 64 delivery facilities in the study area. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression to assess the influence of distance and several quality dimensions on place of delivery. Women lived a median of 3.3 km from the closest delivery facility, and 58% delivered in a facility. The probability of facility delivery ranged from 68% among women living 1 km from their closest facility to 22% among those living 25 km away, adjusted for confounders. Measured quality of care at the closest facility was not associated with use, except that facility delivery was lower when the closest facility provided substandard care on the EmOC dimension. These results do not imply, however, that we should increase geographic accessibility of care without improving facility quality. While this may be successful in increasing facility deliveries, such care cannot be expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4978958/ /pubmed/27506292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Nesbitt, Robin C. Lohela, Terhi J. Soremekun, Seyi Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Okyere, Eunice Grundy, Chris Amenga-Etego, Seeba Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R. Gabrysch, Sabine The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title | The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title_full | The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title_fullStr | The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title_short | The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana |
title_sort | influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural ghana |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nesbittrobinc theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT lohelaterhij theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT soremekunseyi theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT vesellinda theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT manualexander theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT okyereeunice theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT grundychris theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT amengaetegoseeba theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT owusuagyeiseth theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT kirkwoodbettyr theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT gabryschsabine theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT nesbittrobinc influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT lohelaterhij influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT soremekunseyi influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT vesellinda influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT manualexander influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT okyereeunice influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT grundychris influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT amengaetegoseeba influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT owusuagyeiseth influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT kirkwoodbettyr influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana AT gabryschsabine influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana |