Cargando…

The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana

Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahaf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nesbitt, Robin C., Lohela, Terhi J., Soremekun, Seyi, Vesel, Linda, Manu, Alexander, Okyere, Eunice, Grundy, Chris, Amenga-Etego, Seeba, Owusu-Agyei, Seth, Kirkwood, Betty R., Gabrysch, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291
_version_ 1782447247338766336
author Nesbitt, Robin C.
Lohela, Terhi J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Okyere, Eunice
Grundy, Chris
Amenga-Etego, Seeba
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R.
Gabrysch, Sabine
author_facet Nesbitt, Robin C.
Lohela, Terhi J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Okyere, Eunice
Grundy, Chris
Amenga-Etego, Seeba
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R.
Gabrysch, Sabine
author_sort Nesbitt, Robin C.
collection PubMed
description Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of care data from all 64 delivery facilities in the study area. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression to assess the influence of distance and several quality dimensions on place of delivery. Women lived a median of 3.3 km from the closest delivery facility, and 58% delivered in a facility. The probability of facility delivery ranged from 68% among women living 1 km from their closest facility to 22% among those living 25 km away, adjusted for confounders. Measured quality of care at the closest facility was not associated with use, except that facility delivery was lower when the closest facility provided substandard care on the EmOC dimension. These results do not imply, however, that we should increase geographic accessibility of care without improving facility quality. While this may be successful in increasing facility deliveries, such care cannot be expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4978958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49789582016-08-18 The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana Nesbitt, Robin C. Lohela, Terhi J. Soremekun, Seyi Vesel, Linda Manu, Alexander Okyere, Eunice Grundy, Chris Amenga-Etego, Seeba Owusu-Agyei, Seth Kirkwood, Betty R. Gabrysch, Sabine Sci Rep Article Facility delivery is an important aspect of the strategy to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Geographic access to care is a strong determinant of facility delivery, but few studies have simultaneously considered the influence of facility quality, with inconsistent findings. In rural Brong Ahafo region in Ghana, we combined surveillance data on 11,274 deliveries with quality of care data from all 64 delivery facilities in the study area. We used multivariable multilevel logistic regression to assess the influence of distance and several quality dimensions on place of delivery. Women lived a median of 3.3 km from the closest delivery facility, and 58% delivered in a facility. The probability of facility delivery ranged from 68% among women living 1 km from their closest facility to 22% among those living 25 km away, adjusted for confounders. Measured quality of care at the closest facility was not associated with use, except that facility delivery was lower when the closest facility provided substandard care on the EmOC dimension. These results do not imply, however, that we should increase geographic accessibility of care without improving facility quality. While this may be successful in increasing facility deliveries, such care cannot be expected to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4978958/ /pubmed/27506292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Nesbitt, Robin C.
Lohela, Terhi J.
Soremekun, Seyi
Vesel, Linda
Manu, Alexander
Okyere, Eunice
Grundy, Chris
Amenga-Etego, Seeba
Owusu-Agyei, Seth
Kirkwood, Betty R.
Gabrysch, Sabine
The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title_full The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title_fullStr The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title_full_unstemmed The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title_short The influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural Ghana
title_sort influence of distance and quality of care on place of delivery in rural ghana
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4978958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27506292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30291
work_keys_str_mv AT nesbittrobinc theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT lohelaterhij theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT soremekunseyi theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT vesellinda theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT manualexander theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT okyereeunice theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT grundychris theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT amengaetegoseeba theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT owusuagyeiseth theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT kirkwoodbettyr theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT gabryschsabine theinfluenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT nesbittrobinc influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT lohelaterhij influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT soremekunseyi influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT vesellinda influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT manualexander influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT okyereeunice influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT grundychris influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT amengaetegoseeba influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT owusuagyeiseth influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT kirkwoodbettyr influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana
AT gabryschsabine influenceofdistanceandqualityofcareonplaceofdeliveryinruralghana