Cargando…

An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact

BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Searles, Andrew, Doran, Chris, Attia, John, Knight, Darryl, Wiggers, John, Deeming, Simon, Mattes, Joerg, Webb, Brad, Hannan, Steve, Ling, Rod, Edmunds, Kim, Reeves, Penny, Nilsson, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2
_version_ 1782447274926800896
author Searles, Andrew
Doran, Chris
Attia, John
Knight, Darryl
Wiggers, John
Deeming, Simon
Mattes, Joerg
Webb, Brad
Hannan, Steve
Ling, Rod
Edmunds, Kim
Reeves, Penny
Nilsson, Michael
author_facet Searles, Andrew
Doran, Chris
Attia, John
Knight, Darryl
Wiggers, John
Deeming, Simon
Mattes, Joerg
Webb, Brad
Hannan, Steve
Ling, Rod
Edmunds, Kim
Reeves, Penny
Nilsson, Michael
author_sort Searles, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as a consequence of funding research. This case study reports on the development of a novel, conceptual framework that goes beyond measurement. The Framework To Assess the Impact from Translational health research, or FAIT, is a platform designed to prospectively measure and encourage research translation and research impact. A key assumption underpinning FAIT is that research translation is a prerequisite for research impact. METHODS: The research impact literature was mined to understand the range of existing frameworks and techniques employed to measure and encourage research translation and research impact. This review provided insights for the development of a FAIT prototype. A Steering Committee oversaw the project and provided the feedback that was used to refine FAIT. RESULTS: The outcome of the case study was the conceptual framework, FAIT, which is based on a modified program logic model and a hybrid of three proven methodologies for measuring research impact, namely a modified Payback method, social return on investment, and case studies or narratives of the process by which research translates and generates impact. CONCLUSION: As funders increasingly seek to understand the return on their research investments, the routine measurement of research translation and research impact is likely to become mandatory rather than optional. Measurement of research impact on its own is insufficient. There should also be a mechanism attached to measurement that encourages research translation and impact – FAIT was designed for this task.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49791282016-08-11 An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact Searles, Andrew Doran, Chris Attia, John Knight, Darryl Wiggers, John Deeming, Simon Mattes, Joerg Webb, Brad Hannan, Steve Ling, Rod Edmunds, Kim Reeves, Penny Nilsson, Michael Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as a consequence of funding research. This case study reports on the development of a novel, conceptual framework that goes beyond measurement. The Framework To Assess the Impact from Translational health research, or FAIT, is a platform designed to prospectively measure and encourage research translation and research impact. A key assumption underpinning FAIT is that research translation is a prerequisite for research impact. METHODS: The research impact literature was mined to understand the range of existing frameworks and techniques employed to measure and encourage research translation and research impact. This review provided insights for the development of a FAIT prototype. A Steering Committee oversaw the project and provided the feedback that was used to refine FAIT. RESULTS: The outcome of the case study was the conceptual framework, FAIT, which is based on a modified program logic model and a hybrid of three proven methodologies for measuring research impact, namely a modified Payback method, social return on investment, and case studies or narratives of the process by which research translates and generates impact. CONCLUSION: As funders increasingly seek to understand the return on their research investments, the routine measurement of research translation and research impact is likely to become mandatory rather than optional. Measurement of research impact on its own is insufficient. There should also be a mechanism attached to measurement that encourages research translation and impact – FAIT was designed for this task. BioMed Central 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4979128/ /pubmed/27507300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Searles, Andrew
Doran, Chris
Attia, John
Knight, Darryl
Wiggers, John
Deeming, Simon
Mattes, Joerg
Webb, Brad
Hannan, Steve
Ling, Rod
Edmunds, Kim
Reeves, Penny
Nilsson, Michael
An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title_full An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title_fullStr An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title_full_unstemmed An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title_short An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
title_sort approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507300
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2
work_keys_str_mv AT searlesandrew anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT doranchris anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT attiajohn anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT knightdarryl anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT wiggersjohn anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT deemingsimon anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT mattesjoerg anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT webbbrad anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT hannansteve anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT lingrod anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT edmundskim anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT reevespenny anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT nilssonmichael anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT searlesandrew approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT doranchris approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT attiajohn approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT knightdarryl approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT wiggersjohn approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT deemingsimon approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT mattesjoerg approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT webbbrad approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT hannansteve approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT lingrod approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT edmundskim approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT reevespenny approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact
AT nilssonmichael approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact