Cargando…
An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact
BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2 |
_version_ | 1782447274926800896 |
---|---|
author | Searles, Andrew Doran, Chris Attia, John Knight, Darryl Wiggers, John Deeming, Simon Mattes, Joerg Webb, Brad Hannan, Steve Ling, Rod Edmunds, Kim Reeves, Penny Nilsson, Michael |
author_facet | Searles, Andrew Doran, Chris Attia, John Knight, Darryl Wiggers, John Deeming, Simon Mattes, Joerg Webb, Brad Hannan, Steve Ling, Rod Edmunds, Kim Reeves, Penny Nilsson, Michael |
author_sort | Searles, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as a consequence of funding research. This case study reports on the development of a novel, conceptual framework that goes beyond measurement. The Framework To Assess the Impact from Translational health research, or FAIT, is a platform designed to prospectively measure and encourage research translation and research impact. A key assumption underpinning FAIT is that research translation is a prerequisite for research impact. METHODS: The research impact literature was mined to understand the range of existing frameworks and techniques employed to measure and encourage research translation and research impact. This review provided insights for the development of a FAIT prototype. A Steering Committee oversaw the project and provided the feedback that was used to refine FAIT. RESULTS: The outcome of the case study was the conceptual framework, FAIT, which is based on a modified program logic model and a hybrid of three proven methodologies for measuring research impact, namely a modified Payback method, social return on investment, and case studies or narratives of the process by which research translates and generates impact. CONCLUSION: As funders increasingly seek to understand the return on their research investments, the routine measurement of research translation and research impact is likely to become mandatory rather than optional. Measurement of research impact on its own is insufficient. There should also be a mechanism attached to measurement that encourages research translation and impact – FAIT was designed for this task. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4979128 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49791282016-08-11 An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact Searles, Andrew Doran, Chris Attia, John Knight, Darryl Wiggers, John Deeming, Simon Mattes, Joerg Webb, Brad Hannan, Steve Ling, Rod Edmunds, Kim Reeves, Penny Nilsson, Michael Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Research translation, particularly in the biomedical area, is often discussed but there are few methods that are routinely used to measure it or its impact. Of the impact measurement methods that are used, most aim to provide accountability – to measure and explain what was generated as a consequence of funding research. This case study reports on the development of a novel, conceptual framework that goes beyond measurement. The Framework To Assess the Impact from Translational health research, or FAIT, is a platform designed to prospectively measure and encourage research translation and research impact. A key assumption underpinning FAIT is that research translation is a prerequisite for research impact. METHODS: The research impact literature was mined to understand the range of existing frameworks and techniques employed to measure and encourage research translation and research impact. This review provided insights for the development of a FAIT prototype. A Steering Committee oversaw the project and provided the feedback that was used to refine FAIT. RESULTS: The outcome of the case study was the conceptual framework, FAIT, which is based on a modified program logic model and a hybrid of three proven methodologies for measuring research impact, namely a modified Payback method, social return on investment, and case studies or narratives of the process by which research translates and generates impact. CONCLUSION: As funders increasingly seek to understand the return on their research investments, the routine measurement of research translation and research impact is likely to become mandatory rather than optional. Measurement of research impact on its own is insufficient. There should also be a mechanism attached to measurement that encourages research translation and impact – FAIT was designed for this task. BioMed Central 2016-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4979128/ /pubmed/27507300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Searles, Andrew Doran, Chris Attia, John Knight, Darryl Wiggers, John Deeming, Simon Mattes, Joerg Webb, Brad Hannan, Steve Ling, Rod Edmunds, Kim Reeves, Penny Nilsson, Michael An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title | An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title_full | An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title_fullStr | An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title_full_unstemmed | An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title_short | An approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
title_sort | approach to measuring and encouraging research translation and research impact |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979128/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507300 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0131-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT searlesandrew anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT doranchris anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT attiajohn anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT knightdarryl anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT wiggersjohn anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT deemingsimon anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT mattesjoerg anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT webbbrad anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT hannansteve anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT lingrod anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT edmundskim anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT reevespenny anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT nilssonmichael anapproachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT searlesandrew approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT doranchris approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT attiajohn approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT knightdarryl approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT wiggersjohn approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT deemingsimon approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT mattesjoerg approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT webbbrad approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT hannansteve approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT lingrod approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT edmundskim approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT reevespenny approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact AT nilssonmichael approachtomeasuringandencouragingresearchtranslationandresearchimpact |