Cargando…

Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process

BACKGROUND: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a singl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çiçek, Ersan, Koçak, Mustafa Murat, Koçak, Sibel, Sağlam, Baran Can
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563185
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186456
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal and similar length were selected. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system with a torque-controlled engine. The root canals were dried and were obturated using Gutta-percha and sealer. The specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the retreatment procedures (Group 1, Mtwo retreatment files; Group 2, Mtwo retreatment files + Mtwo rotary file #30 supplementary file; Group 3, ProTaper Universal retreatment (PTUR) files; and Group 4, PTUR files + ProTaper F3 supplementary file). The extruded debris during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.590). A significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of supplementary file significantly increased the amount of apically extruded debris.