Cargando…

Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process

BACKGROUND: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a singl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Çiçek, Ersan, Koçak, Mustafa Murat, Koçak, Sibel, Sağlam, Baran Can
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563185
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186456
_version_ 1782447296922779648
author Çiçek, Ersan
Koçak, Mustafa Murat
Koçak, Sibel
Sağlam, Baran Can
author_facet Çiçek, Ersan
Koçak, Mustafa Murat
Koçak, Sibel
Sağlam, Baran Can
author_sort Çiçek, Ersan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal and similar length were selected. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system with a torque-controlled engine. The root canals were dried and were obturated using Gutta-percha and sealer. The specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the retreatment procedures (Group 1, Mtwo retreatment files; Group 2, Mtwo retreatment files + Mtwo rotary file #30 supplementary file; Group 3, ProTaper Universal retreatment (PTUR) files; and Group 4, PTUR files + ProTaper F3 supplementary file). The extruded debris during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.590). A significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of supplementary file significantly increased the amount of apically extruded debris.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49792832016-08-25 Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process Çiçek, Ersan Koçak, Mustafa Murat Koçak, Sibel Sağlam, Baran Can J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The type of instrument affects the amount of debris extruded. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of retreatment systems and supplementary file application on the amount of apical debris extrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight extracted mandibular premolars with a single canal and similar length were selected. The root canals were prepared with the ProTaper Universal system with a torque-controlled engine. The root canals were dried and were obturated using Gutta-percha and sealer. The specimens were randomly divided into four equal groups according to the retreatment procedures (Group 1, Mtwo retreatment files; Group 2, Mtwo retreatment files + Mtwo rotary file #30 supplementary file; Group 3, ProTaper Universal retreatment (PTUR) files; and Group 4, PTUR files + ProTaper F3 supplementary file). The extruded debris during instrumentation were collected into preweighed Eppendorf tubes. The amount of apically extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the initial weight of the tube from the final weight. Three consecutive weights were obtained for each tube. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in the amount of apically extruded debris between Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.590). A significant difference was observed between Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05), and between Groups 3 and 4 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The use of supplementary file significantly increased the amount of apically extruded debris. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4979283/ /pubmed/27563185 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186456 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Çiçek, Ersan
Koçak, Mustafa Murat
Koçak, Sibel
Sağlam, Baran Can
Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title_full Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title_fullStr Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title_short Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
title_sort comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563185
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.186456
work_keys_str_mv AT cicekersan comparisonoftheamountofapicaldebrisextrusionassociatedwithdifferentretreatmentsystemsandsupplementaryfileapplicationduringretreatmentprocess
AT kocakmustafamurat comparisonoftheamountofapicaldebrisextrusionassociatedwithdifferentretreatmentsystemsandsupplementaryfileapplicationduringretreatmentprocess
AT kocaksibel comparisonoftheamountofapicaldebrisextrusionassociatedwithdifferentretreatmentsystemsandsupplementaryfileapplicationduringretreatmentprocess
AT saglambarancan comparisonoftheamountofapicaldebrisextrusionassociatedwithdifferentretreatmentsystemsandsupplementaryfileapplicationduringretreatmentprocess