Cargando…

Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review

The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motamedian, Saeed Reza, Khojaste, Moein, Khojasteh, Arash
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143
_version_ 1782447309473185792
author Motamedian, Saeed Reza
Khojaste, Moein
Khojasteh, Arash
author_facet Motamedian, Saeed Reza
Khojaste, Moein
Khojasteh, Arash
author_sort Motamedian, Saeed Reza
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of implants inserted in augmented alveolar ridges with autogenous or ALBs were included. Primary search identified 470 studies. For autogenous bone block (ABB) 36 articles and for ALB 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on implant survival/success rate of both techniques was limited to observational studies with relatively small sample sizes. Study design, treatment methods, follow-ups, defect location, and morphology varied among studies. The range of implant survival and success rates in ABB was from 73.8% to 100% and 72.8% to 100%, respectively. The corresponding numbers for ALB were 95.3–100% and 93.7–100%, respectively. A definite conclusion could not be reached. Future studies with long-term follow-ups are required to further elucidate this issue.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49793492016-08-25 Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review Motamedian, Saeed Reza Khojaste, Moein Khojasteh, Arash Ann Maxillofac Surg Review Article The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of implants inserted in augmented alveolar ridges with autogenous or ALBs were included. Primary search identified 470 studies. For autogenous bone block (ABB) 36 articles and for ALB 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on implant survival/success rate of both techniques was limited to observational studies with relatively small sample sizes. Study design, treatment methods, follow-ups, defect location, and morphology varied among studies. The range of implant survival and success rates in ABB was from 73.8% to 100% and 72.8% to 100%, respectively. The corresponding numbers for ALB were 95.3–100% and 93.7–100%, respectively. A definite conclusion could not be reached. Future studies with long-term follow-ups are required to further elucidate this issue. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4979349/ /pubmed/27563613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Motamedian, Saeed Reza
Khojaste, Moein
Khojasteh, Arash
Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title_full Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title_fullStr Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title_short Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
title_sort success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: a systematic literature review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563613
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143
work_keys_str_mv AT motamediansaeedreza successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview
AT khojastemoein successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview
AT khojasteharash successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview