Cargando…
Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review
The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of impl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143 |
_version_ | 1782447309473185792 |
---|---|
author | Motamedian, Saeed Reza Khojaste, Moein Khojasteh, Arash |
author_facet | Motamedian, Saeed Reza Khojaste, Moein Khojasteh, Arash |
author_sort | Motamedian, Saeed Reza |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of implants inserted in augmented alveolar ridges with autogenous or ALBs were included. Primary search identified 470 studies. For autogenous bone block (ABB) 36 articles and for ALB 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on implant survival/success rate of both techniques was limited to observational studies with relatively small sample sizes. Study design, treatment methods, follow-ups, defect location, and morphology varied among studies. The range of implant survival and success rates in ABB was from 73.8% to 100% and 72.8% to 100%, respectively. The corresponding numbers for ALB were 95.3–100% and 93.7–100%, respectively. A definite conclusion could not be reached. Future studies with long-term follow-ups are required to further elucidate this issue. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4979349 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49793492016-08-25 Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review Motamedian, Saeed Reza Khojaste, Moein Khojasteh, Arash Ann Maxillofac Surg Review Article The aim of this study is to review and compare survival/success rate of dental implants inserted in autogenous and allogenic bone blocks (ALBs). A PubMed search was performed from January 1990 to June 2014 limited to English language and human studies. Studies that reported treatment outcome of implants inserted in augmented alveolar ridges with autogenous or ALBs were included. Primary search identified 470 studies. For autogenous bone block (ABB) 36 articles and for ALB 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Evidence on implant survival/success rate of both techniques was limited to observational studies with relatively small sample sizes. Study design, treatment methods, follow-ups, defect location, and morphology varied among studies. The range of implant survival and success rates in ABB was from 73.8% to 100% and 72.8% to 100%, respectively. The corresponding numbers for ALB were 95.3–100% and 93.7–100%, respectively. A definite conclusion could not be reached. Future studies with long-term follow-ups are required to further elucidate this issue. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4979349/ /pubmed/27563613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Motamedian, Saeed Reza Khojaste, Moein Khojasteh, Arash Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title | Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title_full | Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title_short | Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review |
title_sort | success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: a systematic literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979349/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563613 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.186143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT motamediansaeedreza successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview AT khojastemoein successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview AT khojasteharash successrateofimplantsplacedinautogenousboneblocksversusallogenicboneblocksasystematicliteraturereview |