Cargando…

Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells

Loco-regional hyperthermia treatment has long history in oncology. Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT, trade name: oncothermia) is an emerging curative treatment method in this field due to its highly selective actions. The impedance-matched, capacitive-coupled modulated radiofrequency (RF) curren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andocs, G, Rehman, M U, Zhao, Q-L, Tabuchi, Y, Kanamori, M, Kondo, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.39
_version_ 1782447323510472704
author Andocs, G
Rehman, M U
Zhao, Q-L
Tabuchi, Y
Kanamori, M
Kondo, T
author_facet Andocs, G
Rehman, M U
Zhao, Q-L
Tabuchi, Y
Kanamori, M
Kondo, T
author_sort Andocs, G
collection PubMed
description Loco-regional hyperthermia treatment has long history in oncology. Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT, trade name: oncothermia) is an emerging curative treatment method in this field due to its highly selective actions. The impedance-matched, capacitive-coupled modulated radiofrequency (RF) current is selectively focused in the malignant cell membrane of the cancer cells. Our objective is studying the cell-death process and comparing the cellular effects of conventional water-bath hyperthermia treatment to mEHT. The U937 human histiocytic lymphoma cell line was used for the experiments. In the case of conventional hyperthermia treatment, cells were immersed in a thermoregulated water bath, whereas in the case of mEHT, the cells were treated using a special RF generator (LabEHY, Oncotherm) and an applicator. The heating dynamics, the maximum temperature reached (42 °C) and the treatment duration (30 min) were exactly the same in both cases. Cell samples were analysed using different flow cytometric methods as well as microarray gene expression assay and western blot analysis was also used to reveal the molecular basis of the induced effects. Definite difference was observed in the biological response to different heat treatments. At 42 °C, only mEHT induced significant apoptotic cell death. The GeneChip analysis revealed a whole cluster of genes, which are highly up-regulated in case of only RF heating, but not in conventional heating. The Fas, c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) and ERK signalling pathway was the dominant factor to induce apoptotic cell death in mEHT, whereas the cell-protective mechanisms dominated in case of conventional heating. This study has clearly shown that conventional hyperthermia and RF mEHT can result in different biological responses at the same temperature. The reason for the difference is the distinct, non-homogenous energy distribution on the cell membrane, which activates cell death-related signalling pathways in mEHT treatment but not in conventional heat treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49794662016-08-22 Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells Andocs, G Rehman, M U Zhao, Q-L Tabuchi, Y Kanamori, M Kondo, T Cell Death Discov Article Loco-regional hyperthermia treatment has long history in oncology. Modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT, trade name: oncothermia) is an emerging curative treatment method in this field due to its highly selective actions. The impedance-matched, capacitive-coupled modulated radiofrequency (RF) current is selectively focused in the malignant cell membrane of the cancer cells. Our objective is studying the cell-death process and comparing the cellular effects of conventional water-bath hyperthermia treatment to mEHT. The U937 human histiocytic lymphoma cell line was used for the experiments. In the case of conventional hyperthermia treatment, cells were immersed in a thermoregulated water bath, whereas in the case of mEHT, the cells were treated using a special RF generator (LabEHY, Oncotherm) and an applicator. The heating dynamics, the maximum temperature reached (42 °C) and the treatment duration (30 min) were exactly the same in both cases. Cell samples were analysed using different flow cytometric methods as well as microarray gene expression assay and western blot analysis was also used to reveal the molecular basis of the induced effects. Definite difference was observed in the biological response to different heat treatments. At 42 °C, only mEHT induced significant apoptotic cell death. The GeneChip analysis revealed a whole cluster of genes, which are highly up-regulated in case of only RF heating, but not in conventional heating. The Fas, c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) and ERK signalling pathway was the dominant factor to induce apoptotic cell death in mEHT, whereas the cell-protective mechanisms dominated in case of conventional heating. This study has clearly shown that conventional hyperthermia and RF mEHT can result in different biological responses at the same temperature. The reason for the difference is the distinct, non-homogenous energy distribution on the cell membrane, which activates cell death-related signalling pathways in mEHT treatment but not in conventional heat treatment. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4979466/ /pubmed/27551529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.39 Text en Copyright © 2016 Official Journal of the Cell Death Differentiation Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Andocs, G
Rehman, M U
Zhao, Q-L
Tabuchi, Y
Kanamori, M
Kondo, T
Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title_full Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title_fullStr Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title_short Comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma U937 cells
title_sort comparison of biological effects of modulated electro-hyperthermia and conventional heat treatment in human lymphoma u937 cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cddiscovery.2016.39
work_keys_str_mv AT andocsg comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells
AT rehmanmu comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells
AT zhaoql comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells
AT tabuchiy comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells
AT kanamorim comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells
AT kondot comparisonofbiologicaleffectsofmodulatedelectrohyperthermiaandconventionalheattreatmentinhumanlymphomau937cells