Cargando…

Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity

BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid and reliable observational measures of early child development in low‐income and middle‐income country settings. METHODS: The aims of the study were to adapt the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley III) for a rural Ethiopian setting and evaluate reliabil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanlon, C., Medhin, G., Worku, B., Tomlinson, M., Alem, A., Dewey, M., Prince, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12371
_version_ 1782447350350872576
author Hanlon, C.
Medhin, G.
Worku, B.
Tomlinson, M.
Alem, A.
Dewey, M.
Prince, M.
author_facet Hanlon, C.
Medhin, G.
Worku, B.
Tomlinson, M.
Alem, A.
Dewey, M.
Prince, M.
author_sort Hanlon, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid and reliable observational measures of early child development in low‐income and middle‐income country settings. METHODS: The aims of the study were to adapt the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley III) for a rural Ethiopian setting and evaluate reliability and validity. The study was carried out between January 2008 and January 2009 in the Butajira demographic surveillance site, south central Ethiopia. The Bayley III was adapted to be socioculturally appropriate for a rural Ethiopian context. Nurses and high school graduates were trained in administration of the measure for 10 days. Inter‐rater reliability was evaluated (n = 60). Content, construct and convergent validity was then examined on a population‐based cohort of children at the ages of 30 (n = 440) and 42 months (n = 456). Mokken scale analysis was used to determine the scalability of items in unidimensional, hierarchical sub‐scales. The mean score was compared by age of child and by stunting status (less than −2 z scores below the standard height‐for‐age). RESULTS: The intra‐class correlations between raters were above 0.90 for all sub‐scales of the child development measure. Some scale items were not contextually relevant and showed poor scalability. However, the majority of items scaled onto the existing sub‐scales of the international measure to form adequate‐to‐strong hierarchical scales with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α above 0.70 except for gross motor and expressive language sub‐scales). Item‐scale coefficients were good. The mean score of all sub‐scales was significantly higher in the older group of children (33.02 higher total score; P < 0.001) and in the children who were stunted (total Bayley score 2.58 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 5.10) points lower at 30 months and 3.87 (1.94 to 5.81) points lower at 42 months. CONCLUSIONS: An adapted version of an international, observational measure of child development was found to be reliable, valid and feasible in a rural Ethiopian setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49796642016-08-23 Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity Hanlon, C. Medhin, G. Worku, B. Tomlinson, M. Alem, A. Dewey, M. Prince, M. Child Care Health Dev Original Articles BACKGROUND: There is a need for valid and reliable observational measures of early child development in low‐income and middle‐income country settings. METHODS: The aims of the study were to adapt the Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley III) for a rural Ethiopian setting and evaluate reliability and validity. The study was carried out between January 2008 and January 2009 in the Butajira demographic surveillance site, south central Ethiopia. The Bayley III was adapted to be socioculturally appropriate for a rural Ethiopian context. Nurses and high school graduates were trained in administration of the measure for 10 days. Inter‐rater reliability was evaluated (n = 60). Content, construct and convergent validity was then examined on a population‐based cohort of children at the ages of 30 (n = 440) and 42 months (n = 456). Mokken scale analysis was used to determine the scalability of items in unidimensional, hierarchical sub‐scales. The mean score was compared by age of child and by stunting status (less than −2 z scores below the standard height‐for‐age). RESULTS: The intra‐class correlations between raters were above 0.90 for all sub‐scales of the child development measure. Some scale items were not contextually relevant and showed poor scalability. However, the majority of items scaled onto the existing sub‐scales of the international measure to form adequate‐to‐strong hierarchical scales with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α above 0.70 except for gross motor and expressive language sub‐scales). Item‐scale coefficients were good. The mean score of all sub‐scales was significantly higher in the older group of children (33.02 higher total score; P < 0.001) and in the children who were stunted (total Bayley score 2.58 (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 5.10) points lower at 30 months and 3.87 (1.94 to 5.81) points lower at 42 months. CONCLUSIONS: An adapted version of an international, observational measure of child development was found to be reliable, valid and feasible in a rural Ethiopian setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-06 2016-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4979664/ /pubmed/27381579 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12371 Text en © 2016 The Authors Child: Care, Health and Development Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hanlon, C.
Medhin, G.
Worku, B.
Tomlinson, M.
Alem, A.
Dewey, M.
Prince, M.
Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title_full Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title_fullStr Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title_full_unstemmed Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title_short Adapting the Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development in Ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
title_sort adapting the bayley scales of infant and toddler development in ethiopia: evaluation of reliability and validity
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27381579
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12371
work_keys_str_mv AT hanlonc adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT medhing adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT workub adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT tomlinsonm adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT alema adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT deweym adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity
AT princem adaptingthebayleyscalesofinfantandtoddlerdevelopmentinethiopiaevaluationofreliabilityandvalidity