Cargando…

Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages

AIM: Beta diversity describes the variation in species composition between sites and can be used to infer why different species occupy different parts of the globe. It can be viewed in a number of ways. First, it can be partitioned into two distinct patterns: turnover and nestedness. Second, it can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bishop, Tom R., Robertson, Mark P., van Rensburg, Berndt J., Parr, Catherine L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12537
_version_ 1782447353502892032
author Bishop, Tom R.
Robertson, Mark P.
van Rensburg, Berndt J.
Parr, Catherine L.
author_facet Bishop, Tom R.
Robertson, Mark P.
van Rensburg, Berndt J.
Parr, Catherine L.
author_sort Bishop, Tom R.
collection PubMed
description AIM: Beta diversity describes the variation in species composition between sites and can be used to infer why different species occupy different parts of the globe. It can be viewed in a number of ways. First, it can be partitioned into two distinct patterns: turnover and nestedness. Second, it can be investigated from either a species identity or a functional‐trait point of view. We aim to document for the first time how these two aspects of beta diversity vary in response to a large environmental gradient. LOCATION: Maloti‐Drakensberg Mountains, southern Africa. METHODS: We sampled ant assemblages along an extensive elevational gradient (900–3000 m a.s.l.) twice yearly for 7 years, and collected functional‐trait information related to the species’ dietary and habitat‐structure preferences. We used recently developed methods to partition species and functional beta diversity into their turnover and nestedness components. A series of null models were used to test whether the observed beta diversity patterns differed from random expectations. RESULTS: Species beta diversity was driven by turnover, but functional beta diversity was composed of both turnover and nestedness patterns at different parts of the gradient. Null models revealed that deterministic processes were likely to be responsible for the species patterns but that the functional changes were indistinguishable from stochasticity. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Different ant species are found with increasing elevation, but they tend to represent an increasingly nested subset of the available functional strategies. This finding is unique and narrows down the list of possible factors that control ant existence across elevation. We conclude that diet and habitat preferences have little role in structuring ant assemblages in montane environments and that some other factor must be driving the non‐random patterns of species turnover. This finding also highlights the importance of distinguishing between different kinds of beta diversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49796792016-08-23 Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages Bishop, Tom R. Robertson, Mark P. van Rensburg, Berndt J. Parr, Catherine L. J Biogeogr Invertebrate Biogeography AIM: Beta diversity describes the variation in species composition between sites and can be used to infer why different species occupy different parts of the globe. It can be viewed in a number of ways. First, it can be partitioned into two distinct patterns: turnover and nestedness. Second, it can be investigated from either a species identity or a functional‐trait point of view. We aim to document for the first time how these two aspects of beta diversity vary in response to a large environmental gradient. LOCATION: Maloti‐Drakensberg Mountains, southern Africa. METHODS: We sampled ant assemblages along an extensive elevational gradient (900–3000 m a.s.l.) twice yearly for 7 years, and collected functional‐trait information related to the species’ dietary and habitat‐structure preferences. We used recently developed methods to partition species and functional beta diversity into their turnover and nestedness components. A series of null models were used to test whether the observed beta diversity patterns differed from random expectations. RESULTS: Species beta diversity was driven by turnover, but functional beta diversity was composed of both turnover and nestedness patterns at different parts of the gradient. Null models revealed that deterministic processes were likely to be responsible for the species patterns but that the functional changes were indistinguishable from stochasticity. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Different ant species are found with increasing elevation, but they tend to represent an increasingly nested subset of the available functional strategies. This finding is unique and narrows down the list of possible factors that control ant existence across elevation. We conclude that diet and habitat preferences have little role in structuring ant assemblages in montane environments and that some other factor must be driving the non‐random patterns of species turnover. This finding also highlights the importance of distinguishing between different kinds of beta diversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-05-16 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4979679/ /pubmed/27563167 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12537 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Journal of Biogeography Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invertebrate Biogeography
Bishop, Tom R.
Robertson, Mark P.
van Rensburg, Berndt J.
Parr, Catherine L.
Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title_full Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title_fullStr Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title_short Contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
title_sort contrasting species and functional beta diversity in montane ant assemblages
topic Invertebrate Biogeography
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27563167
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12537
work_keys_str_mv AT bishoptomr contrastingspeciesandfunctionalbetadiversityinmontaneantassemblages
AT robertsonmarkp contrastingspeciesandfunctionalbetadiversityinmontaneantassemblages
AT vanrensburgberndtj contrastingspeciesandfunctionalbetadiversityinmontaneantassemblages
AT parrcatherinel contrastingspeciesandfunctionalbetadiversityinmontaneantassemblages