Cargando…

Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study

Despite the fact that surgery is commonly used to treat glenohumeral instability, there is no evidence that such treatment effectively corrects glenohumeral translation. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to analyze the effect of surgical stabilization on glenohumeral translation. Gl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lädermann, Alexandre, Denard, Patrick J., Tirefort, Jérôme, Kolo, Frank C., Chagué, Sylvain, Cunningham, Grégory, Charbonnier, Caecilia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004369
_version_ 1782447377329684480
author Lädermann, Alexandre
Denard, Patrick J.
Tirefort, Jérôme
Kolo, Frank C.
Chagué, Sylvain
Cunningham, Grégory
Charbonnier, Caecilia
author_facet Lädermann, Alexandre
Denard, Patrick J.
Tirefort, Jérôme
Kolo, Frank C.
Chagué, Sylvain
Cunningham, Grégory
Charbonnier, Caecilia
author_sort Lädermann, Alexandre
collection PubMed
description Despite the fact that surgery is commonly used to treat glenohumeral instability, there is no evidence that such treatment effectively corrects glenohumeral translation. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to analyze the effect of surgical stabilization on glenohumeral translation. Glenohumeral translation was assessed in 11 patients preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively following surgical stabilization for anterior shoulder instability. Translation was measured using optical motion capture and computed tomography. Preoperatively, anterior translation of the affected shoulder was bigger in comparison to the normal contralateral side. Differences were significant for flexion and abduction movements (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, no patients demonstrated apprehension and all functional scores were improved. Despite absence of apprehension, postoperative anterior translation for the surgically stabilized shoulders was not significantly different from the preoperative values. While surgical treatment for anterior instability limits the chance of dislocation, it does not seem to restore glenohumeral translation during functional range of motion. Such persistent microinstability may explain residual pain, apprehension, inability to return to activity and even emergence of dislocation arthropathy that is seen in some patients. Further research is necessary to better understand the causes, effects, and treatment of residual microinstability following surgical stabilization of the shoulder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49797972016-08-18 Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study Lädermann, Alexandre Denard, Patrick J. Tirefort, Jérôme Kolo, Frank C. Chagué, Sylvain Cunningham, Grégory Charbonnier, Caecilia Medicine (Baltimore) 7000 Despite the fact that surgery is commonly used to treat glenohumeral instability, there is no evidence that such treatment effectively corrects glenohumeral translation. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to analyze the effect of surgical stabilization on glenohumeral translation. Glenohumeral translation was assessed in 11 patients preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively following surgical stabilization for anterior shoulder instability. Translation was measured using optical motion capture and computed tomography. Preoperatively, anterior translation of the affected shoulder was bigger in comparison to the normal contralateral side. Differences were significant for flexion and abduction movements (P < 0.001). Postoperatively, no patients demonstrated apprehension and all functional scores were improved. Despite absence of apprehension, postoperative anterior translation for the surgically stabilized shoulders was not significantly different from the preoperative values. While surgical treatment for anterior instability limits the chance of dislocation, it does not seem to restore glenohumeral translation during functional range of motion. Such persistent microinstability may explain residual pain, apprehension, inability to return to activity and even emergence of dislocation arthropathy that is seen in some patients. Further research is necessary to better understand the causes, effects, and treatment of residual microinstability following surgical stabilization of the shoulder. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4979797/ /pubmed/27495043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004369 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7000
Lädermann, Alexandre
Denard, Patrick J.
Tirefort, Jérôme
Kolo, Frank C.
Chagué, Sylvain
Cunningham, Grégory
Charbonnier, Caecilia
Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title_full Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title_fullStr Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title_short Does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: A prospective comparative cohort study
title_sort does surgery for instability of the shoulder truly stabilize the glenohumeral joint?: a prospective comparative cohort study
topic 7000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004369
work_keys_str_mv AT ladermannalexandre doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT denardpatrickj doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT tirefortjerome doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT kolofrankc doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT chaguesylvain doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT cunninghamgregory doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy
AT charbonniercaecilia doessurgeryforinstabilityoftheshouldertrulystabilizetheglenohumeraljointaprospectivecomparativecohortstudy