Cargando…
A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382 |
_version_ | 1782447378459000832 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Zhonghai Zhang, Xinlin Wu, Han Xie, Jun Dai, Qing Wang, Lian Xu, Biao |
author_facet | Wei, Zhonghai Zhang, Xinlin Wu, Han Xie, Jun Dai, Qing Wang, Lian Xu, Biao |
author_sort | Wei, Zhonghai |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devices were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to November 2015. The incidence rates from individual studies were combined to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety, including all-cause death, cardiac/neurological death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies involving 3585 patients and 6 different occlusion devices were eligible for our inclusion criteria. The procedural failure rate for LAA closure was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). The all-cause mortality was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03) and cardiac/neurological mortality was 0 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). The stroke/TIA rate was estimated only 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.01). The incidence of thrombus on devices was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.02). The major hemorrhagic complication rate was estimated 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). Pericardial effusion/tamponade was estimated 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). No heterogeneity was observed for above pooled estimates (I(2) = 0). In devices subgroups analysis, the all-cause mortality and cardiac/neurological mortality of PLAATO group were the highest (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), whereas the incidence of thrombus on devices in the ACP group was the highest (P < 0.01). In follow-up period subgroups analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death, stroke/TIA, major hemorrhage, and pericardial effusion/tamponade events between the shorter and longer follow-up period subgroups (P < 0.05). However, the differences among the subgroups were numerically small. CONCLUSIONS: the pooled data demonstrated that transcatheter LAA occlusion was effective and safe in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not suitable for lifelong antithrombotic therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4979802 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49798022016-08-18 A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Wei, Zhonghai Zhang, Xinlin Wu, Han Xie, Jun Dai, Qing Wang, Lian Xu, Biao Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devices were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to November 2015. The incidence rates from individual studies were combined to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety, including all-cause death, cardiac/neurological death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies involving 3585 patients and 6 different occlusion devices were eligible for our inclusion criteria. The procedural failure rate for LAA closure was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). The all-cause mortality was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03) and cardiac/neurological mortality was 0 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). The stroke/TIA rate was estimated only 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.01). The incidence of thrombus on devices was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.02). The major hemorrhagic complication rate was estimated 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). Pericardial effusion/tamponade was estimated 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). No heterogeneity was observed for above pooled estimates (I(2) = 0). In devices subgroups analysis, the all-cause mortality and cardiac/neurological mortality of PLAATO group were the highest (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), whereas the incidence of thrombus on devices in the ACP group was the highest (P < 0.01). In follow-up period subgroups analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death, stroke/TIA, major hemorrhage, and pericardial effusion/tamponade events between the shorter and longer follow-up period subgroups (P < 0.05). However, the differences among the subgroups were numerically small. CONCLUSIONS: the pooled data demonstrated that transcatheter LAA occlusion was effective and safe in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not suitable for lifelong antithrombotic therapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4979802/ /pubmed/27495048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3400 Wei, Zhonghai Zhang, Xinlin Wu, Han Xie, Jun Dai, Qing Wang, Lian Xu, Biao A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title | A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_full | A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_short | A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation |
topic | 3400 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979802/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weizhonghai ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT zhangxinlin ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT wuhan ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT xiejun ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT daiqing ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT wanglian ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT xubiao ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT weizhonghai metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT zhangxinlin metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT wuhan metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT xiejun metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT daiqing metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT wanglian metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation AT xubiao metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation |