Cargando…

A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Zhonghai, Zhang, Xinlin, Wu, Han, Xie, Jun, Dai, Qing, Wang, Lian, Xu, Biao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382
_version_ 1782447378459000832
author Wei, Zhonghai
Zhang, Xinlin
Wu, Han
Xie, Jun
Dai, Qing
Wang, Lian
Xu, Biao
author_facet Wei, Zhonghai
Zhang, Xinlin
Wu, Han
Xie, Jun
Dai, Qing
Wang, Lian
Xu, Biao
author_sort Wei, Zhonghai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devices were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to November 2015. The incidence rates from individual studies were combined to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety, including all-cause death, cardiac/neurological death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies involving 3585 patients and 6 different occlusion devices were eligible for our inclusion criteria. The procedural failure rate for LAA closure was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). The all-cause mortality was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03) and cardiac/neurological mortality was 0 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). The stroke/TIA rate was estimated only 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.01). The incidence of thrombus on devices was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.02). The major hemorrhagic complication rate was estimated 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). Pericardial effusion/tamponade was estimated 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). No heterogeneity was observed for above pooled estimates (I(2) = 0). In devices subgroups analysis, the all-cause mortality and cardiac/neurological mortality of PLAATO group were the highest (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), whereas the incidence of thrombus on devices in the ACP group was the highest (P < 0.01). In follow-up period subgroups analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death, stroke/TIA, major hemorrhage, and pericardial effusion/tamponade events between the shorter and longer follow-up period subgroups (P < 0.05). However, the differences among the subgroups were numerically small. CONCLUSIONS: the pooled data demonstrated that transcatheter LAA occlusion was effective and safe in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not suitable for lifelong antithrombotic therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49798022016-08-18 A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Wei, Zhonghai Zhang, Xinlin Wu, Han Xie, Jun Dai, Qing Wang, Lian Xu, Biao Medicine (Baltimore) 3400 OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The randomized controlled trials (RCT) or observational studies with any transcatheter LAA occlusion devices were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to November 2015. The incidence rates from individual studies were combined to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety, including all-cause death, cardiac/neurological death, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thrombosis, hemorrhagic complications, and pericardial effusion/tamponade. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies involving 3585 patients and 6 different occlusion devices were eligible for our inclusion criteria. The procedural failure rate for LAA closure was 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). The all-cause mortality was 0.03 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03) and cardiac/neurological mortality was 0 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). The stroke/TIA rate was estimated only 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.01). The incidence of thrombus on devices was 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01–0.02). The major hemorrhagic complication rate was estimated 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00–0.01). Pericardial effusion/tamponade was estimated 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02–0.03). No heterogeneity was observed for above pooled estimates (I(2) = 0). In devices subgroups analysis, the all-cause mortality and cardiac/neurological mortality of PLAATO group were the highest (P = 0.01 and P < 0.01 respectively), whereas the incidence of thrombus on devices in the ACP group was the highest (P < 0.01). In follow-up period subgroups analysis, there were significant differences in all-cause death, stroke/TIA, major hemorrhage, and pericardial effusion/tamponade events between the shorter and longer follow-up period subgroups (P < 0.05). However, the differences among the subgroups were numerically small. CONCLUSIONS: the pooled data demonstrated that transcatheter LAA occlusion was effective and safe in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not suitable for lifelong antithrombotic therapy. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4979802/ /pubmed/27495048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 3400
Wei, Zhonghai
Zhang, Xinlin
Wu, Han
Xie, Jun
Dai, Qing
Wang, Lian
Xu, Biao
A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_short A meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
title_sort meta-analysis for efficacy and safety evaluation of transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
topic 3400
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27495048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004382
work_keys_str_mv AT weizhonghai ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT zhangxinlin ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT wuhan ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT xiejun ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT daiqing ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT wanglian ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT xubiao ametaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT weizhonghai metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT zhangxinlin metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT wuhan metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT xiejun metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT daiqing metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT wanglian metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation
AT xubiao metaanalysisforefficacyandsafetyevaluationoftranscatheterleftatrialappendageocclusioninpatientswithnonvalvularatrialfibrillation