Cargando…
Assumptions of Mixed Treatment Comparisons in Health Technology Assessments - Challenges and Possible Steps for Practical Application
The validity of mixed treatment comparisons (MTCs), also called network meta-analysis, relies on whether it is reasonable to accept the underlying assumptions on similarity, homogeneity, and consistency. The aim of this paper is to propose a practicable approach to addressing the underlying assumpti...
Autores principales: | Reken, Stefanie, Sturtz, Sibylle, Kiefer, Corinna, Böhler, Yvonne-Beatrice, Wieseler, Beate |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979893/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160712 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption
por: Kiefer, Corinna, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessing sensitivity to assumptions in mixed effects analyses of stepped-wedge trials
por: Davey, Calum, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Challenging the assumptions
por: Schmidt, CW
Publicado: (2000) -
A systematic comparison of different composite measures (DAS 28, CDAI, SDAI, and Boolean approach) for determining treatment effects on low disease activity and remission in rheumatoid arthritis
por: Janke, Kirsten, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Mutant enzymes challenge all assumptions
por: Nottingham, Ryan M, et al.
Publicado: (2014)