Cargando…

Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory and/or home monitoring are recommended in the UK and the US for the diagnosis of hypertension but little is known about their acceptability. AIM: To determine the acceptability of different methods of measuring blood pressure to people from different minority ethnic groups. DE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Sally, Greenfield, Sheila M, Sayeed Haque, M, Martin, Una, Gill, Paramjit S, Mant, Jonathan, Mohammed, Mohammed A, Heer, Gurdip, Johal, Amanpreet, Kaur, Ramandeep, Schwartz, Claire, McManus, Richard J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685717
_version_ 1782447403938349056
author Wood, Sally
Greenfield, Sheila M
Sayeed Haque, M
Martin, Una
Gill, Paramjit S
Mant, Jonathan
Mohammed, Mohammed A
Heer, Gurdip
Johal, Amanpreet
Kaur, Ramandeep
Schwartz, Claire
McManus, Richard J
author_facet Wood, Sally
Greenfield, Sheila M
Sayeed Haque, M
Martin, Una
Gill, Paramjit S
Mant, Jonathan
Mohammed, Mohammed A
Heer, Gurdip
Johal, Amanpreet
Kaur, Ramandeep
Schwartz, Claire
McManus, Richard J
author_sort Wood, Sally
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ambulatory and/or home monitoring are recommended in the UK and the US for the diagnosis of hypertension but little is known about their acceptability. AIM: To determine the acceptability of different methods of measuring blood pressure to people from different minority ethnic groups. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study with focus groups in primary care in the West Midlands. METHOD: People of different ethnicities with and without hypertension were assessed for acceptability of clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement using completion rate, questionnaire, and focus groups. RESULTS: A total of 770 participants were included, who were white British (n = 300), South Asian (n = 241), and African Caribbean (n = 229). White British participants had significantly higher successful completion rates across all monitoring modalities compared with the other ethnic groups, especially for ambulatory monitoring: white British (n = 277, 92% [95% confidence interval [CI] = 89% to 95%]) versus South Asian (n = 171, 71% [95% CI = 65% to 76%], P<0.001) and African Caribbean (n = 188, 82% [95% CI = 77% to 87%], P<0.001), respectively. There were significantly lower acceptability scores for minority ethnic participants across all monitoring methods compared with white British participants. Focus group results highlighted self-monitoring as most acceptable and ambulatory monitoring least acceptable without consistent differences by ethnicity. Clinic monitoring was seen as inconvenient and anxiety provoking but with the advantage of immediate professional input. CONCLUSION: Reduced acceptability and completion rates among minority ethnic groups raise important questions for the implementation and interpretation of blood pressure monitoring. Selection of method of blood pressure monitoring should take into account clinical need, patient preference, and potential cultural barriers to monitoring.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4979941
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49799412016-08-25 Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care Wood, Sally Greenfield, Sheila M Sayeed Haque, M Martin, Una Gill, Paramjit S Mant, Jonathan Mohammed, Mohammed A Heer, Gurdip Johal, Amanpreet Kaur, Ramandeep Schwartz, Claire McManus, Richard J Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Ambulatory and/or home monitoring are recommended in the UK and the US for the diagnosis of hypertension but little is known about their acceptability. AIM: To determine the acceptability of different methods of measuring blood pressure to people from different minority ethnic groups. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional study with focus groups in primary care in the West Midlands. METHOD: People of different ethnicities with and without hypertension were assessed for acceptability of clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure measurement using completion rate, questionnaire, and focus groups. RESULTS: A total of 770 participants were included, who were white British (n = 300), South Asian (n = 241), and African Caribbean (n = 229). White British participants had significantly higher successful completion rates across all monitoring modalities compared with the other ethnic groups, especially for ambulatory monitoring: white British (n = 277, 92% [95% confidence interval [CI] = 89% to 95%]) versus South Asian (n = 171, 71% [95% CI = 65% to 76%], P<0.001) and African Caribbean (n = 188, 82% [95% CI = 77% to 87%], P<0.001), respectively. There were significantly lower acceptability scores for minority ethnic participants across all monitoring methods compared with white British participants. Focus group results highlighted self-monitoring as most acceptable and ambulatory monitoring least acceptable without consistent differences by ethnicity. Clinic monitoring was seen as inconvenient and anxiety provoking but with the advantage of immediate professional input. CONCLUSION: Reduced acceptability and completion rates among minority ethnic groups raise important questions for the implementation and interpretation of blood pressure monitoring. Selection of method of blood pressure monitoring should take into account clinical need, patient preference, and potential cultural barriers to monitoring. Royal College of General Practitioners 2016-08 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4979941/ /pubmed/27266860 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685717 Text en © British Journal of General Practice 2016 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wood, Sally
Greenfield, Sheila M
Sayeed Haque, M
Martin, Una
Gill, Paramjit S
Mant, Jonathan
Mohammed, Mohammed A
Heer, Gurdip
Johal, Amanpreet
Kaur, Ramandeep
Schwartz, Claire
McManus, Richard J
Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title_full Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title_fullStr Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title_short Influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
title_sort influence of ethnicity on acceptability of method of blood pressure monitoring: a cross-sectional study in primary care
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4979941/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27266860
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685717
work_keys_str_mv AT woodsally influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT greenfieldsheilam influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT sayeedhaquem influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT martinuna influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT gillparamjits influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT mantjonathan influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT mohammedmohammeda influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT heergurdip influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT johalamanpreet influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT kaurramandeep influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT schwartzclaire influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare
AT mcmanusrichardj influenceofethnicityonacceptabilityofmethodofbloodpressuremonitoringacrosssectionalstudyinprimarycare