Cargando…

Molecular characterization of NRXN1 deletions from 19,263 clinical microarray cases identifies exons important for neurodevelopmental disease expression

PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to assess the penetrance of NRXN1 deletions. METHODS: We compared the prevalence and genomic extent of NRXN1 deletions identified among 19,263 clinically referred cases to that of 15,264 controls. The burden of additional clinically relevant CNVs was use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowther, Chelsea, Speevak, Marsha, Armour, Christine M., Goh, Elaine S., Graham, Gail E., Li, Chumei, Zeesman, Susan, Nowaczyk, Malgorzata J.M., Schultz, Lee-Anne, Morra, Antonella, Nicolson, Rob, Bikangaga, Peter, Samdup, Dawa, Zaazou, Mostafa, Boyd, Kerry, Jung, Jack H., Siu, Victoria, Rajguru, Manjulata, Goobie, Sharan, Tarnopolsky, Mark A., Prasad, Chitra, Dick, Paul T., Hussain, Asmaa S., Walinga, Margreet, Reijenga, Renske G., Gazzellone, Matthew, Lionel, Anath C., Marshall, Christian R., Scherer, Stephen W., Stavropoulos, Dimitri J., McCready, Elizabeth, Bassett, Anne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4980119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27195815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2016.54
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of the current study was to assess the penetrance of NRXN1 deletions. METHODS: We compared the prevalence and genomic extent of NRXN1 deletions identified among 19,263 clinically referred cases to that of 15,264 controls. The burden of additional clinically relevant CNVs was used as a proxy to estimate the relative penetrance of NRXN1 deletions. RESULTS: We identified 41 (0.21%) previously unreported exonic NRXN1 deletions ascertained for developmental delay/intellectual disability, significantly greater than in controls [OR=8.14 (95% CI 2.91–22.72), p< 0.0001)]. Ten (22.7%) of these had a second clinically relevant CNV. Subjects with a deletion near the 3′ end of NRXN1 were significantly more likely to have a second rare CNV than subjects with a 5′ NRXN1 deletion [OR=7.47 (95% CI 2.36–23.61), p=0.0006]. The prevalence of intronic NRXN1 deletions was not statistically different between cases and controls (p=0.618). The majority (63.2%) of intronic NRXN1 deletion cases had a second rare CNV, a two-fold greater prevalence than for exonic NRXN1 deletion cases (p=0.0035). CONCLUSIONS: The results support the importance of exons near the 5′ end of NRXN1 in the expression of neurodevelopmental disorders. Intronic NRXN1 deletions do not appear to substantially increase the risk for clinical phenotypes.