Cargando…

Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre

Although intralesional meglumine antimoniate (MA) infiltration is considered an option for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) therapy and is widely used in the Old World, there have been few studies supporting this therapeutic approach in the Americas. This study aims to describe outcomes and adverse even...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane, Toledo, Antonio, Senna, Maria Camilo, Rabello, Ana, Cota, Gláucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160183
_version_ 1782447569184489472
author da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane
Toledo, Antonio
Senna, Maria Camilo
Rabello, Ana
Cota, Gláucia
author_facet da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane
Toledo, Antonio
Senna, Maria Camilo
Rabello, Ana
Cota, Gláucia
author_sort da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane
collection PubMed
description Although intralesional meglumine antimoniate (MA) infiltration is considered an option for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) therapy and is widely used in the Old World, there have been few studies supporting this therapeutic approach in the Americas. This study aims to describe outcomes and adverse events associated with intralesional therapy for CL. This retrospective study reviewed the experience of a Brazilian leishmaniasis reference centre using intralesional MA to treat 31 patients over five years (2008 and 2013). The median age was 63 years (22-86) and the median duration time of the lesions up to treatment was 16 weeks. In 22 patients (71%), intralesional therapy was indicated due to the presence of contraindications or previous serious adverse events with systemic MA. Other indications were failure of systemic therapy or ease of administration. Intralesional treatment consisted of one-six infiltrations (median three) for a period of up to 12 weeks. The initial (three months) and definitive (six months) cure rates were 70.9% and 67.7%, respectively. Most patients reported mild discomfort during infiltration and no serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, these results show that the intralesional MA efficacy rate was very similar to that of systemic MA treatment, and reinforce the need for further studies with adequate design to establish the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4981119
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49811192016-08-12 Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane Toledo, Antonio Senna, Maria Camilo Rabello, Ana Cota, Gláucia Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Articles Although intralesional meglumine antimoniate (MA) infiltration is considered an option for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) therapy and is widely used in the Old World, there have been few studies supporting this therapeutic approach in the Americas. This study aims to describe outcomes and adverse events associated with intralesional therapy for CL. This retrospective study reviewed the experience of a Brazilian leishmaniasis reference centre using intralesional MA to treat 31 patients over five years (2008 and 2013). The median age was 63 years (22-86) and the median duration time of the lesions up to treatment was 16 weeks. In 22 patients (71%), intralesional therapy was indicated due to the presence of contraindications or previous serious adverse events with systemic MA. Other indications were failure of systemic therapy or ease of administration. Intralesional treatment consisted of one-six infiltrations (median three) for a period of up to 12 weeks. The initial (three months) and definitive (six months) cure rates were 70.9% and 67.7%, respectively. Most patients reported mild discomfort during infiltration and no serious adverse events were observed. In conclusion, these results show that the intralesional MA efficacy rate was very similar to that of systemic MA treatment, and reinforce the need for further studies with adequate design to establish the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Ministério da Saúde 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4981119/ /pubmed/27508321 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160183 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
da Silva, Rosiana Estéfane
Toledo, Antonio
Senna, Maria Camilo
Rabello, Ana
Cota, Gláucia
Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title_full Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title_fullStr Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title_full_unstemmed Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title_short Intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a Brazilian referral centre
title_sort intralesional meglumine antimoniate for the treatment of localised cutaneous leishmaniasis: a retrospective review of a brazilian referral centre
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981119/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27508321
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760160183
work_keys_str_mv AT dasilvarosianaestefane intralesionalmeglumineantimoniateforthetreatmentoflocalisedcutaneousleishmaniasisaretrospectivereviewofabrazilianreferralcentre
AT toledoantonio intralesionalmeglumineantimoniateforthetreatmentoflocalisedcutaneousleishmaniasisaretrospectivereviewofabrazilianreferralcentre
AT sennamariacamilo intralesionalmeglumineantimoniateforthetreatmentoflocalisedcutaneousleishmaniasisaretrospectivereviewofabrazilianreferralcentre
AT rabelloana intralesionalmeglumineantimoniateforthetreatmentoflocalisedcutaneousleishmaniasisaretrospectivereviewofabrazilianreferralcentre
AT cotaglaucia intralesionalmeglumineantimoniateforthetreatmentoflocalisedcutaneousleishmaniasisaretrospectivereviewofabrazilianreferralcentre