Cargando…

Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study

BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to inhaled therapy is common in patients with asthma and COPD. An inhaler selection based on patients’ preference could be beneficial to adherence and treatment effectiveness. Properly designed questionnaires can assess patients’ satisfaction with their medication devices....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zervas, Eleftherios, Samitas, Konstantinos, Gaga, Mina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540287
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S113870
_version_ 1782447574393815040
author Zervas, Eleftherios
Samitas, Konstantinos
Gaga, Mina
author_facet Zervas, Eleftherios
Samitas, Konstantinos
Gaga, Mina
author_sort Zervas, Eleftherios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to inhaled therapy is common in patients with asthma and COPD. An inhaler selection based on patients’ preference could be beneficial to adherence and treatment effectiveness. Properly designed questionnaires can assess patients’ satisfaction with their medication devices. The aim of this study was to estimate, using the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire, the ease of use and satisfaction of patients regarding three different marketed dry powder inhalers (DPIs): Diskus(®) (DK), Elpenhaler(®) (EH), and Turbuhaler(®) (TH). The FSI-10 is a self-completed questionnaire to assess patients’ opinions regarding ease of use, portability, and usability of devices, irrespective of the drug used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a 4-week, open, noninterventional, multicenter, parallel clinical study in 560 asthmatic and 561 COPD patients. During the first visit, patients were classified into three groups according to the DPI they were already using. Patients were regularly receiving their treatments (Seretide DK, Rolenium EH, and Symbicort TH) and agreed to complete the FSI-10 questionnaire in the second visit. RESULTS: A total of 517 COPD and 523 asthma patients completed the study. All DPIs tested received satisfactory results, while the EH obtained consistently higher scores in the FSI-10 in both COPD and asthma patients (44.7 and 44.1 vs 41.5 and 43 for TH, 40.8 and 41.4 for DK, P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). TH was rated better than DK by asthma patients. Patients suffering with severe COPD tended to express higher feeling of satisfaction than those with moderate or mild disease, irrespective of the device used. CONCLUSION: All DPIs tested were highly acceptable by asthma and COPD patients of different ages; nevertheless, EH received significantly higher ratings in most of the questionnaire domains. COPD patients in advanced stages of the disease generally expressed higher level of satisfaction with their devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4981170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49811702016-08-18 Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study Zervas, Eleftherios Samitas, Konstantinos Gaga, Mina Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: Poor adherence to inhaled therapy is common in patients with asthma and COPD. An inhaler selection based on patients’ preference could be beneficial to adherence and treatment effectiveness. Properly designed questionnaires can assess patients’ satisfaction with their medication devices. The aim of this study was to estimate, using the Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler (FSI-10) questionnaire, the ease of use and satisfaction of patients regarding three different marketed dry powder inhalers (DPIs): Diskus(®) (DK), Elpenhaler(®) (EH), and Turbuhaler(®) (TH). The FSI-10 is a self-completed questionnaire to assess patients’ opinions regarding ease of use, portability, and usability of devices, irrespective of the drug used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a 4-week, open, noninterventional, multicenter, parallel clinical study in 560 asthmatic and 561 COPD patients. During the first visit, patients were classified into three groups according to the DPI they were already using. Patients were regularly receiving their treatments (Seretide DK, Rolenium EH, and Symbicort TH) and agreed to complete the FSI-10 questionnaire in the second visit. RESULTS: A total of 517 COPD and 523 asthma patients completed the study. All DPIs tested received satisfactory results, while the EH obtained consistently higher scores in the FSI-10 in both COPD and asthma patients (44.7 and 44.1 vs 41.5 and 43 for TH, 40.8 and 41.4 for DK, P<0.001 and P<0.01, respectively). TH was rated better than DK by asthma patients. Patients suffering with severe COPD tended to express higher feeling of satisfaction than those with moderate or mild disease, irrespective of the device used. CONCLUSION: All DPIs tested were highly acceptable by asthma and COPD patients of different ages; nevertheless, EH received significantly higher ratings in most of the questionnaire domains. COPD patients in advanced stages of the disease generally expressed higher level of satisfaction with their devices. Dove Medical Press 2016-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4981170/ /pubmed/27540287 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S113870 Text en © 2016 Zervas et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zervas, Eleftherios
Samitas, Konstantinos
Gaga, Mina
Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title_full Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title_fullStr Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title_short Assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in Greek patients with COPD and asthma: the ANASA study
title_sort assessment of satisfaction with different dry powder inhalation devices in greek patients with copd and asthma: the anasa study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27540287
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S113870
work_keys_str_mv AT zervaseleftherios assessmentofsatisfactionwithdifferentdrypowderinhalationdevicesingreekpatientswithcopdandasthmatheanasastudy
AT samitaskonstantinos assessmentofsatisfactionwithdifferentdrypowderinhalationdevicesingreekpatientswithcopdandasthmatheanasastudy
AT gagamina assessmentofsatisfactionwithdifferentdrypowderinhalationdevicesingreekpatientswithcopdandasthmatheanasastudy