Cargando…

Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVES: In hospitals, the pharmacy information system (PIS) is usually a sub-system of the hospital information system (HIS). The PIS supports the distribution and management of drugs, shows drug and medical device inventory, and facilitates preparing needed reports. In this study, pharmacy info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazemi, Alireza, Rabiei, Reza, Moghaddasi, Hamid, Deimazar, Ghasem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525164
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.3.231
_version_ 1782447630642577408
author Kazemi, Alireza
Rabiei, Reza
Moghaddasi, Hamid
Deimazar, Ghasem
author_facet Kazemi, Alireza
Rabiei, Reza
Moghaddasi, Hamid
Deimazar, Ghasem
author_sort Kazemi, Alireza
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In hospitals, the pharmacy information system (PIS) is usually a sub-system of the hospital information system (HIS). The PIS supports the distribution and management of drugs, shows drug and medical device inventory, and facilitates preparing needed reports. In this study, pharmacy information systems implemented in general teaching hospitals affiliated to medical universities in Tehran (Iran) were evaluated using a multi-dimensional tool. METHODS: This was an evaluation study conducted in 2015. To collect data, a checklist was developed by reviewing the relevant literature; this checklist included both general and specific criteria to evaluate pharmacy information systems. The checklist was then validated by medical informatics experts and pharmacists. The sample of the study included five PIS in general-teaching hospitals affiliated to three medical universities in Tehran (Iran). Data were collected using the checklist and through observing the systems. The findings were presented as tables. RESULTS: Five PIS were evaluated in the five general-teaching hospitals that had the highest bed numbers. The findings showed that the evaluated pharmacy information systems lacked some important general and specific criteria. Among the general evaluation criteria, it was found that only two of the PIS studied were capable of restricting repeated attempts made for unauthorized access to the systems. With respect to the specific evaluation criteria, no attention was paid to the patient safety aspect. CONCLUSIONS: The PIS studied were mainly designed to support financial tasks; little attention was paid to clinical and patient safety features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4981583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Medical Informatics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49815832016-08-12 Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study Kazemi, Alireza Rabiei, Reza Moghaddasi, Hamid Deimazar, Ghasem Healthc Inform Res Case Report OBJECTIVES: In hospitals, the pharmacy information system (PIS) is usually a sub-system of the hospital information system (HIS). The PIS supports the distribution and management of drugs, shows drug and medical device inventory, and facilitates preparing needed reports. In this study, pharmacy information systems implemented in general teaching hospitals affiliated to medical universities in Tehran (Iran) were evaluated using a multi-dimensional tool. METHODS: This was an evaluation study conducted in 2015. To collect data, a checklist was developed by reviewing the relevant literature; this checklist included both general and specific criteria to evaluate pharmacy information systems. The checklist was then validated by medical informatics experts and pharmacists. The sample of the study included five PIS in general-teaching hospitals affiliated to three medical universities in Tehran (Iran). Data were collected using the checklist and through observing the systems. The findings were presented as tables. RESULTS: Five PIS were evaluated in the five general-teaching hospitals that had the highest bed numbers. The findings showed that the evaluated pharmacy information systems lacked some important general and specific criteria. Among the general evaluation criteria, it was found that only two of the PIS studied were capable of restricting repeated attempts made for unauthorized access to the systems. With respect to the specific evaluation criteria, no attention was paid to the patient safety aspect. CONCLUSIONS: The PIS studied were mainly designed to support financial tasks; little attention was paid to clinical and patient safety features. Korean Society of Medical Informatics 2016-07 2016-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4981583/ /pubmed/27525164 http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.3.231 Text en © 2016 The Korean Society of Medical Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kazemi, Alireza
Rabiei, Reza
Moghaddasi, Hamid
Deimazar, Ghasem
Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title_full Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title_fullStr Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title_short Pharmacy Information Systems in Teaching Hospitals: A Multi-dimensional Evaluation Study
title_sort pharmacy information systems in teaching hospitals: a multi-dimensional evaluation study
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27525164
http://dx.doi.org/10.4258/hir.2016.22.3.231
work_keys_str_mv AT kazemialireza pharmacyinformationsystemsinteachinghospitalsamultidimensionalevaluationstudy
AT rabieireza pharmacyinformationsystemsinteachinghospitalsamultidimensionalevaluationstudy
AT moghaddasihamid pharmacyinformationsystemsinteachinghospitalsamultidimensionalevaluationstudy
AT deimazarghasem pharmacyinformationsystemsinteachinghospitalsamultidimensionalevaluationstudy