Cargando…

The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback

Neurofeedback is increasingly recognized as an intervention to treat core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite the large number of studies having been carried out to evaluate its effectiveness, it is widely elusive what neuronal mechanisms related to the core symptoms...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bluschke, Annet, Broschwitz, Felicia, Kohl, Simon, Roessner, Veit, Beste, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27514985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31178
_version_ 1782447668987953152
author Bluschke, Annet
Broschwitz, Felicia
Kohl, Simon
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
author_facet Bluschke, Annet
Broschwitz, Felicia
Kohl, Simon
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
author_sort Bluschke, Annet
collection PubMed
description Neurofeedback is increasingly recognized as an intervention to treat core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite the large number of studies having been carried out to evaluate its effectiveness, it is widely elusive what neuronal mechanisms related to the core symptoms of ADHD are modulated by neurofeedback. 19 children with ADHD undergoing 8 weeks of theta/beta neurofeedback and 17 waiting list controls performed a Go/Nogo task in a pre-post design. We used neurophysiological measures combining high-density EEG recording with source localization analyses using sLORETA. Compared to the waiting list ADHD control group, impulsive behaviour measured was reduced after neurofeedback treatment. The effects of neurofeedback were very specific for situations requiring inhibitory control over responses. The neurophysiological data shows that processes of perceptual gating, attentional selection and resource allocation processes were not affected by neurofeedback. Rather, neurofeedback effects seem to be based on the modulation of response inhibition processes in medial frontal cortices. The study shows that specific neuronal mechanisms underlying impulsivity are modulated by theta/beta neurofeedback in ADHD. The applied neurofeedback protocol could be particularly suitable to address inhibitory control. The study validates assumed functional neuroanatomical target regions of an established neurofeedback protocol on a neurophysiological level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4981886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49818862016-08-19 The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback Bluschke, Annet Broschwitz, Felicia Kohl, Simon Roessner, Veit Beste, Christian Sci Rep Article Neurofeedback is increasingly recognized as an intervention to treat core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite the large number of studies having been carried out to evaluate its effectiveness, it is widely elusive what neuronal mechanisms related to the core symptoms of ADHD are modulated by neurofeedback. 19 children with ADHD undergoing 8 weeks of theta/beta neurofeedback and 17 waiting list controls performed a Go/Nogo task in a pre-post design. We used neurophysiological measures combining high-density EEG recording with source localization analyses using sLORETA. Compared to the waiting list ADHD control group, impulsive behaviour measured was reduced after neurofeedback treatment. The effects of neurofeedback were very specific for situations requiring inhibitory control over responses. The neurophysiological data shows that processes of perceptual gating, attentional selection and resource allocation processes were not affected by neurofeedback. Rather, neurofeedback effects seem to be based on the modulation of response inhibition processes in medial frontal cortices. The study shows that specific neuronal mechanisms underlying impulsivity are modulated by theta/beta neurofeedback in ADHD. The applied neurofeedback protocol could be particularly suitable to address inhibitory control. The study validates assumed functional neuroanatomical target regions of an established neurofeedback protocol on a neurophysiological level. Nature Publishing Group 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4981886/ /pubmed/27514985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31178 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Bluschke, Annet
Broschwitz, Felicia
Kohl, Simon
Roessner, Veit
Beste, Christian
The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title_full The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title_fullStr The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title_full_unstemmed The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title_short The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
title_sort neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in adhd by theta/beta neurofeedback
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4981886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27514985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep31178
work_keys_str_mv AT bluschkeannet theneuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT broschwitzfelicia theneuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT kohlsimon theneuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT roessnerveit theneuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT bestechristian theneuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT bluschkeannet neuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT broschwitzfelicia neuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT kohlsimon neuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT roessnerveit neuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback
AT bestechristian neuronalmechanismsunderlyingimprovementofimpulsivityinadhdbythetabetaneurofeedback