Cargando…
A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the tim...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100 |
_version_ | 1782447697484054528 |
---|---|
author | Bieniek, Magdalena M. Bennett, Patrick J. Sekuler, Allison B. Rousselet, Guillaume A. |
author_facet | Bieniek, Magdalena M. Bennett, Patrick J. Sekuler, Allison B. Rousselet, Guillaume A. |
author_sort | Bieniek, Magdalena M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the timing of the first face‐sensitive responses in humans remains controversial. This controversy is due partially to the susceptibility of dynamic brain measurements to filtering distortions and analysis issues. Here, using distributions of single‐trial event‐related potentials (ERPs), causal filtering, statistical analyses at all electrodes and time points, and effective correction for multiple comparisons, we present evidence that the earliest categorical differences start around 90 ms following stimulus presentation. These results were obtained from a representative group of 120 participants, aged 18–81, who categorized images of faces and noise textures. The results were reliable across testing days, as determined by test–retest assessment in 74 of the participants. Furthermore, a control experiment showed similar ERP onsets for contrasts involving images of houses or white noise. Face onsets did not change with age, suggesting that face sensitivity occurs within 100 ms across the adult lifespan. Finally, the simplicity of the face–texture contrast, and the dominant midline distribution of the effects, suggest the face responses were evoked by relatively simple image properties and are not face specific. Our results provide a new lower benchmark for the earliest neuronal responses to complex objects in the human visual system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4982026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49820262016-08-26 A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans Bieniek, Magdalena M. Bennett, Patrick J. Sekuler, Allison B. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the timing of the first face‐sensitive responses in humans remains controversial. This controversy is due partially to the susceptibility of dynamic brain measurements to filtering distortions and analysis issues. Here, using distributions of single‐trial event‐related potentials (ERPs), causal filtering, statistical analyses at all electrodes and time points, and effective correction for multiple comparisons, we present evidence that the earliest categorical differences start around 90 ms following stimulus presentation. These results were obtained from a representative group of 120 participants, aged 18–81, who categorized images of faces and noise textures. The results were reliable across testing days, as determined by test–retest assessment in 74 of the participants. Furthermore, a control experiment showed similar ERP onsets for contrasts involving images of houses or white noise. Face onsets did not change with age, suggesting that face sensitivity occurs within 100 ms across the adult lifespan. Finally, the simplicity of the face–texture contrast, and the dominant midline distribution of the effects, suggest the face responses were evoked by relatively simple image properties and are not face specific. Our results provide a new lower benchmark for the earliest neuronal responses to complex objects in the human visual system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-14 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4982026/ /pubmed/26469359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Cognitive Neuroscience Bieniek, Magdalena M. Bennett, Patrick J. Sekuler, Allison B. Rousselet, Guillaume A. A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title | A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title_full | A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title_fullStr | A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title_short | A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
title_sort | robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans |
topic | Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bieniekmagdalenam arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT bennettpatrickj arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT sekulerallisonb arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT rousseletguillaumea arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT bieniekmagdalenam robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT bennettpatrickj robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT sekulerallisonb robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans AT rousseletguillaumea robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans |