Cargando…

A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans

How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the tim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bieniek, Magdalena M., Bennett, Patrick J., Sekuler, Allison B., Rousselet, Guillaume A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100
_version_ 1782447697484054528
author Bieniek, Magdalena M.
Bennett, Patrick J.
Sekuler, Allison B.
Rousselet, Guillaume A.
author_facet Bieniek, Magdalena M.
Bennett, Patrick J.
Sekuler, Allison B.
Rousselet, Guillaume A.
author_sort Bieniek, Magdalena M.
collection PubMed
description How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the timing of the first face‐sensitive responses in humans remains controversial. This controversy is due partially to the susceptibility of dynamic brain measurements to filtering distortions and analysis issues. Here, using distributions of single‐trial event‐related potentials (ERPs), causal filtering, statistical analyses at all electrodes and time points, and effective correction for multiple comparisons, we present evidence that the earliest categorical differences start around 90 ms following stimulus presentation. These results were obtained from a representative group of 120 participants, aged 18–81, who categorized images of faces and noise textures. The results were reliable across testing days, as determined by test–retest assessment in 74 of the participants. Furthermore, a control experiment showed similar ERP onsets for contrasts involving images of houses or white noise. Face onsets did not change with age, suggesting that face sensitivity occurs within 100 ms across the adult lifespan. Finally, the simplicity of the face–texture contrast, and the dominant midline distribution of the effects, suggest the face responses were evoked by relatively simple image properties and are not face specific. Our results provide a new lower benchmark for the earliest neuronal responses to complex objects in the human visual system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4982026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49820262016-08-26 A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans Bieniek, Magdalena M. Bennett, Patrick J. Sekuler, Allison B. Rousselet, Guillaume A. Eur J Neurosci Cognitive Neuroscience How early does the brain decode object categories? Addressing this question is critical to constrain the type of neuronal architecture supporting object categorization. In this context, much effort has been devoted to estimating face processing speed. With onsets estimated from 50 to 150 ms, the timing of the first face‐sensitive responses in humans remains controversial. This controversy is due partially to the susceptibility of dynamic brain measurements to filtering distortions and analysis issues. Here, using distributions of single‐trial event‐related potentials (ERPs), causal filtering, statistical analyses at all electrodes and time points, and effective correction for multiple comparisons, we present evidence that the earliest categorical differences start around 90 ms following stimulus presentation. These results were obtained from a representative group of 120 participants, aged 18–81, who categorized images of faces and noise textures. The results were reliable across testing days, as determined by test–retest assessment in 74 of the participants. Furthermore, a control experiment showed similar ERP onsets for contrasts involving images of houses or white noise. Face onsets did not change with age, suggesting that face sensitivity occurs within 100 ms across the adult lifespan. Finally, the simplicity of the face–texture contrast, and the dominant midline distribution of the effects, suggest the face responses were evoked by relatively simple image properties and are not face specific. Our results provide a new lower benchmark for the earliest neuronal responses to complex objects in the human visual system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-11-14 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4982026/ /pubmed/26469359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100 Text en © 2015 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience published by Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Cognitive Neuroscience
Bieniek, Magdalena M.
Bennett, Patrick J.
Sekuler, Allison B.
Rousselet, Guillaume A.
A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title_full A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title_fullStr A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title_full_unstemmed A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title_short A robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
title_sort robust and representative lower bound on object processing speed in humans
topic Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26469359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13100
work_keys_str_mv AT bieniekmagdalenam arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT bennettpatrickj arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT sekulerallisonb arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT rousseletguillaumea arobustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT bieniekmagdalenam robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT bennettpatrickj robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT sekulerallisonb robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans
AT rousseletguillaumea robustandrepresentativelowerboundonobjectprocessingspeedinhumans