Cargando…
Effects of kinetics of light‐induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water‐use efficiency
Both photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (g (s)) respond to changing irradiance, yet stomatal responses are an order of magnitude slower than photosynthesis, resulting in noncoordination between A and g (s) in dynamic light environments. Infrared gas exchange analysis was used to examine the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27214387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14000 |
Sumario: | Both photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (g (s)) respond to changing irradiance, yet stomatal responses are an order of magnitude slower than photosynthesis, resulting in noncoordination between A and g (s) in dynamic light environments. Infrared gas exchange analysis was used to examine the temporal responses and coordination of A and g (s) to a step increase and decrease in light in a range of different species, and the impact on intrinsic water use efficiency was evaluated. The temporal responses revealed a large range of strategies to save water or maximize photosynthesis in the different species used in this study but also displayed an uncoupling of A and g (s) in most of the species. The shape of the guard cells influenced the rapidity of response and the overall g (s) values achieved, with different impacts on A and W (i). The rapidity of g (s) in dumbbell‐shaped guard cells could be attributed to size, whilst in elliptical‐shaped guard cells features other than anatomy were more important for kinetics. Our findings suggest significant variation in the rapidity of stomatal responses amongst species, providing a novel target for improving photosynthesis and water use. |
---|