Cargando…

Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus was the leading cause of childhood diarrhoea-related hospitalisations and death before the introduction of rotavirus vaccines. METHODS: We describe the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines to prevent rotavirus infections and hospitalizations and the main rotavirus strains circul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Victor S., Marques, Daniella P., Martins-Filho, Paulo R. S., Cuevas, Luis E., Gurgel, Ricardo Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27514855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0173-2
_version_ 1782447741416243200
author Santos, Victor S.
Marques, Daniella P.
Martins-Filho, Paulo R. S.
Cuevas, Luis E.
Gurgel, Ricardo Q.
author_facet Santos, Victor S.
Marques, Daniella P.
Martins-Filho, Paulo R. S.
Cuevas, Luis E.
Gurgel, Ricardo Q.
author_sort Santos, Victor S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rotavirus was the leading cause of childhood diarrhoea-related hospitalisations and death before the introduction of rotavirus vaccines. METHODS: We describe the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines to prevent rotavirus infections and hospitalizations and the main rotavirus strains circulating before and after vaccine introduction through a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 1990 and 2014. 203 studies were included to estimate the proportion of infections due to rotavirus and 10 to assess the impact of the vaccines. 41 of 46 studies in the post-vaccination period were used for meta-analysis of genotypes, 20 to calculate VE against infection, eight for VE against hospitalisation and seven for VE against severe rotavirus-diarrhoea. RESULTS: 24.3 % (95 % CI 22.1–26.5) and 16.1 % (95 % CI 13.2–19.3) of cases of diarrhoea were due to rotavirus before and after vaccine introduction, respectively. The most prevalent G types after vaccine introduction were G2 (51.6 %, 95 % CI 38–65), G9 (14.5 %, 95 % CI 7–23) and G1 (14.2 %, 95 % CI 7–23); while the most prevalent P types were P[4] (54.1 %, 95 % CI 41–67) and P[8] (33 %, 95 % CI 22–46). G2P[4] was the most frequent genotype combination after vaccine introduction. Effectiveness was 53 % (95 % CI 46–60) against infection, 73 % (95 % CI, 66–78) against hospitalisation and 74 % (95 % CI, 68.0–78.0) against severe diarrhoea. Reductions in hospitalisations and mortality due to diarrhoea were observed in countries that adopted universal rotavirus vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Rotavirus vaccines are effective in preventing rotavirus-diarrhoea in children in Latin America. The vaccines were associated with changes in genotype distribution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-016-0173-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4982225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49822252016-08-13 Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis Santos, Victor S. Marques, Daniella P. Martins-Filho, Paulo R. S. Cuevas, Luis E. Gurgel, Ricardo Q. Infect Dis Poverty Scoping Review BACKGROUND: Rotavirus was the leading cause of childhood diarrhoea-related hospitalisations and death before the introduction of rotavirus vaccines. METHODS: We describe the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines to prevent rotavirus infections and hospitalizations and the main rotavirus strains circulating before and after vaccine introduction through a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published between 1990 and 2014. 203 studies were included to estimate the proportion of infections due to rotavirus and 10 to assess the impact of the vaccines. 41 of 46 studies in the post-vaccination period were used for meta-analysis of genotypes, 20 to calculate VE against infection, eight for VE against hospitalisation and seven for VE against severe rotavirus-diarrhoea. RESULTS: 24.3 % (95 % CI 22.1–26.5) and 16.1 % (95 % CI 13.2–19.3) of cases of diarrhoea were due to rotavirus before and after vaccine introduction, respectively. The most prevalent G types after vaccine introduction were G2 (51.6 %, 95 % CI 38–65), G9 (14.5 %, 95 % CI 7–23) and G1 (14.2 %, 95 % CI 7–23); while the most prevalent P types were P[4] (54.1 %, 95 % CI 41–67) and P[8] (33 %, 95 % CI 22–46). G2P[4] was the most frequent genotype combination after vaccine introduction. Effectiveness was 53 % (95 % CI 46–60) against infection, 73 % (95 % CI, 66–78) against hospitalisation and 74 % (95 % CI, 68.0–78.0) against severe diarrhoea. Reductions in hospitalisations and mortality due to diarrhoea were observed in countries that adopted universal rotavirus vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Rotavirus vaccines are effective in preventing rotavirus-diarrhoea in children in Latin America. The vaccines were associated with changes in genotype distribution. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40249-016-0173-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4982225/ /pubmed/27514855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0173-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Santos, Victor S.
Marques, Daniella P.
Martins-Filho, Paulo R. S.
Cuevas, Luis E.
Gurgel, Ricardo Q.
Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in Latin America: systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of rotavirus vaccines against rotavirus infection and hospitalization in latin america: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27514855
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0173-2
work_keys_str_mv AT santosvictors effectivenessofrotavirusvaccinesagainstrotavirusinfectionandhospitalizationinlatinamericasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT marquesdaniellap effectivenessofrotavirusvaccinesagainstrotavirusinfectionandhospitalizationinlatinamericasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT martinsfilhopaulors effectivenessofrotavirusvaccinesagainstrotavirusinfectionandhospitalizationinlatinamericasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cuevasluise effectivenessofrotavirusvaccinesagainstrotavirusinfectionandhospitalizationinlatinamericasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gurgelricardoq effectivenessofrotavirusvaccinesagainstrotavirusinfectionandhospitalizationinlatinamericasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis