Cargando…

Work ability and health of security guards at a public University: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the work ability and health status of security guards at a public University. METHODS: a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was carried with 119 security guards. The following instruments were used: Work Ability Index (WAI), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godinho, Marluce Rodrigues, Ferreira, Aldo Pacheco, Greco, Rosangela Maria, Teixeira, Liliane Reis, Teixeira, Maria Teresa Bustamante
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto / Universidade de São Paulo 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27463107
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.0616.2725
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the work ability and health status of security guards at a public University. METHODS: a cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was carried with 119 security guards. The following instruments were used: Work Ability Index (WAI), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ, short), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Medical Outcomes Study (MOS), and Demand-Control-Support (DCS). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study samples and the Spearman's coefficient correlation was performed to assess the WAI. Significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: samples were composed by men; the mean age was 54.9 years (SD=5.7); 80% had partners, and 75% had basic education. The majority (95%) had only one job, the average length of service was 24.8 years (SD=11), ranging from 3 to 43 years. 88.9% worked ≤40 hours and 75% did not work at night shift or rotating shifts. The average score given to work ability was good (40.7 points), with significant correlation to social support at work (p-value=0.002), health conditions (p-value=0.094), and depression symptoms (p-value=0.054). CONCLUSION: this study showed that many characteristics might affect the work ability scores. Considering the results, we note that healthy life habits and a reorganization of work environments should be encouraged.