Cargando…
Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381 |
_version_ | 1782447812196171776 |
---|---|
author | Marshall, Jane Booth, Tracey Devane, Niamh Galliers, Julia Greenwood, Helen Hilari, Katerina Talbot, Richard Wilson, Stephanie Woolf, Celia |
author_facet | Marshall, Jane Booth, Tracey Devane, Niamh Galliers, Julia Greenwood, Helen Hilari, Katerina Talbot, Richard Wilson, Stephanie Woolf, Celia |
author_sort | Marshall, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks’ intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS: There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4982664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49826642016-08-29 Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study Marshall, Jane Booth, Tracey Devane, Niamh Galliers, Julia Greenwood, Helen Hilari, Katerina Talbot, Richard Wilson, Stephanie Woolf, Celia PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks’ intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS: There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings. Public Library of Science 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4982664/ /pubmed/27518188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381 Text en © 2016 Marshall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Marshall, Jane Booth, Tracey Devane, Niamh Galliers, Julia Greenwood, Helen Hilari, Katerina Talbot, Richard Wilson, Stephanie Woolf, Celia Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title | Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title_full | Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title_short | Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study |
title_sort | evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marshalljane evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT boothtracey evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT devaneniamh evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT galliersjulia evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT greenwoodhelen evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT hilarikaterina evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT talbotrichard evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT wilsonstephanie evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy AT woolfcelia evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy |