Cargando…

Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Jane, Booth, Tracey, Devane, Niamh, Galliers, Julia, Greenwood, Helen, Hilari, Katerina, Talbot, Richard, Wilson, Stephanie, Woolf, Celia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381
_version_ 1782447812196171776
author Marshall, Jane
Booth, Tracey
Devane, Niamh
Galliers, Julia
Greenwood, Helen
Hilari, Katerina
Talbot, Richard
Wilson, Stephanie
Woolf, Celia
author_facet Marshall, Jane
Booth, Tracey
Devane, Niamh
Galliers, Julia
Greenwood, Helen
Hilari, Katerina
Talbot, Richard
Wilson, Stephanie
Woolf, Celia
author_sort Marshall, Jane
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks’ intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS: There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4982664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49826642016-08-29 Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study Marshall, Jane Booth, Tracey Devane, Niamh Galliers, Julia Greenwood, Helen Hilari, Katerina Talbot, Richard Wilson, Stephanie Woolf, Celia PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated an intervention for people with aphasia delivered in a novel virtual reality platform called EVA Park. EVA Park contains a number of functional and fantastic locations and allows for interactive communication between multiple users. Twenty people with aphasia had 5 weeks’ intervention, during which they received daily language stimulation sessions in EVA Park from a support worker. The study employed a quasi randomised design, which compared a group that received immediate intervention with a waitlist control group. Outcome measures explored the effects of intervention on communication and language skills, communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation. Compliance with the intervention was also explored through attrition and usage data. RESULTS: There was excellent compliance with the intervention, with no participants lost to follow up and most (18/20) receiving at least 88% of the intended treatment dose. Intervention brought about significant gains on a measure of functional communication. Gains were achieved by both groups of participants, once intervention was received, and were well maintained. Changes on the measures of communicative confidence and feelings of social isolation were not achieved. Results are discussed with reference to previous aphasia therapy findings. Public Library of Science 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4982664/ /pubmed/27518188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381 Text en © 2016 Marshall et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Marshall, Jane
Booth, Tracey
Devane, Niamh
Galliers, Julia
Greenwood, Helen
Hilari, Katerina
Talbot, Richard
Wilson, Stephanie
Woolf, Celia
Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title_full Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title_fullStr Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title_short Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study
title_sort evaluating the benefits of aphasia intervention delivered in virtual reality: results of a quasi-randomised study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160381
work_keys_str_mv AT marshalljane evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT boothtracey evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT devaneniamh evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT galliersjulia evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT greenwoodhelen evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT hilarikaterina evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT talbotrichard evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT wilsonstephanie evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy
AT woolfcelia evaluatingthebenefitsofaphasiainterventiondeliveredinvirtualrealityresultsofaquasirandomisedstudy