Cargando…
Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review
Cancer screening guidelines recommend that women over 50 years regularly be screened for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers. Population-based screening programs use performance indicators to monitor uptake for each type of cancer screening, but integrated measures of adherence across multiple s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161187 |
_version_ | 1782447812652302336 |
---|---|
author | Mema, Silvina C. Yang, Huiming Vaska, Marcus Elnitsky, Sherry Jiang, Zhichang |
author_facet | Mema, Silvina C. Yang, Huiming Vaska, Marcus Elnitsky, Sherry Jiang, Zhichang |
author_sort | Mema, Silvina C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cancer screening guidelines recommend that women over 50 years regularly be screened for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers. Population-based screening programs use performance indicators to monitor uptake for each type of cancer screening, but integrated measures of adherence across multiple screenings are rarely reported. Integrated measures of adherence that combine the three cancers cannot be inferred from measures of screening uptake of each cancer alone; nevertheless, they can help discern the proportion of women who, having received one or two types of screening, may be more amenable to receiving one additional screen, compared to those who haven't had any screening and may experience barriers to access screening such as distance, language, and so on. The focus of our search was to identify indicators of participation in the three cancers, therefore our search strategy included synonyms of integrated screening, cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening. Additionally, we limited our search to studies published between 2000 and 2015, written in English, and pertaining to females over 50 years of age. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL, and Nursing Reference Center, as well as grey literature resources. Of the 78 initially retrieved articles, only 7 reported summary measures of screening across the three cancers. Overall, adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening ranged from around 8% to 43%. Our review confirms that reports of screening adherence across breast, cervical and colorectal cancers are rare. This is surprising, as integrated cancer screening measures can provide additional insight into the needs of the target population that can help craft strategies to improve adherence to all three screenings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4982666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49826662016-08-29 Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review Mema, Silvina C. Yang, Huiming Vaska, Marcus Elnitsky, Sherry Jiang, Zhichang PLoS One Research Article Cancer screening guidelines recommend that women over 50 years regularly be screened for breast, cervical and colorectal cancers. Population-based screening programs use performance indicators to monitor uptake for each type of cancer screening, but integrated measures of adherence across multiple screenings are rarely reported. Integrated measures of adherence that combine the three cancers cannot be inferred from measures of screening uptake of each cancer alone; nevertheless, they can help discern the proportion of women who, having received one or two types of screening, may be more amenable to receiving one additional screen, compared to those who haven't had any screening and may experience barriers to access screening such as distance, language, and so on. The focus of our search was to identify indicators of participation in the three cancers, therefore our search strategy included synonyms of integrated screening, cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening. Additionally, we limited our search to studies published between 2000 and 2015, written in English, and pertaining to females over 50 years of age. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL, and Nursing Reference Center, as well as grey literature resources. Of the 78 initially retrieved articles, only 7 reported summary measures of screening across the three cancers. Overall, adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening ranged from around 8% to 43%. Our review confirms that reports of screening adherence across breast, cervical and colorectal cancers are rare. This is surprising, as integrated cancer screening measures can provide additional insight into the needs of the target population that can help craft strategies to improve adherence to all three screenings. Public Library of Science 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4982666/ /pubmed/27518708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161187 Text en © 2016 Mema et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mema, Silvina C. Yang, Huiming Vaska, Marcus Elnitsky, Sherry Jiang, Zhichang Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title | Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Integrated Cancer Screening Performance Indicators: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | integrated cancer screening performance indicators: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27518708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT memasilvinac integratedcancerscreeningperformanceindicatorsasystematicreview AT yanghuiming integratedcancerscreeningperformanceindicatorsasystematicreview AT vaskamarcus integratedcancerscreeningperformanceindicatorsasystematicreview AT elnitskysherry integratedcancerscreeningperformanceindicatorsasystematicreview AT jiangzhichang integratedcancerscreeningperformanceindicatorsasystematicreview |