Cargando…

The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value

The “science commons,” knowledge that is widely accessible at low or no cost, is a uniquely important input to scientific advance and cumulative technological innovation. It is primarily, although not exclusively, funded by government and nonprofit sources. Much of it is produced at academic researc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Cook-Deegan, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 2006
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9016-9
_version_ 1782447828704952320
author Cook-Deegan, Robert
author_facet Cook-Deegan, Robert
author_sort Cook-Deegan, Robert
collection PubMed
description The “science commons,” knowledge that is widely accessible at low or no cost, is a uniquely important input to scientific advance and cumulative technological innovation. It is primarily, although not exclusively, funded by government and nonprofit sources. Much of it is produced at academic research centers, although some academic science is proprietary and some privately funded R&D enters the science commons. Science in general aspires to Mertonian norms of openness, universality, objectivity, and critical inquiry. The science commons diverges from proprietary science primarily in being open and being very broadly available. These features make the science commons particularly valuable for advancing knowledge, for training innovators who will ultimately work in both public and private sectors, and in providing a common stock of knowledge upon which all players—both public and private—can draw readily. Open science plays two important roles that proprietary R&D cannot: it enables practical benefits even in the absence of profitable markets for goods and services, and its lays a shared foundation for subsequent private R&D. The history of genomics in the period 1992–2004, covering two periods when genomic startup firms attracted significant private R&D investment, illustrates these features of how a science commons contributes value. Commercial interest in genomics was intense during this period. Fierce competition between private sector and public sector genomics programs was highly visible. Seemingly anomalous behavior, such as private firms funding “open science,” can be explained by unusual business dynamics between established firms wanting to preserve a robust science commons to prevent startup firms from limiting established firms’ freedom to operate. Deliberate policies to create and protect a large science commons were pursued by nonprofit and government funders of genomics research, such as the Wellcome Trust and National Institutes of Health. These policies were crucial to keeping genomic data and research tools widely available at low cost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4982884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2006
publisher Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49828842016-08-25 The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value Cook-Deegan, Robert J Technol Transf Article The “science commons,” knowledge that is widely accessible at low or no cost, is a uniquely important input to scientific advance and cumulative technological innovation. It is primarily, although not exclusively, funded by government and nonprofit sources. Much of it is produced at academic research centers, although some academic science is proprietary and some privately funded R&D enters the science commons. Science in general aspires to Mertonian norms of openness, universality, objectivity, and critical inquiry. The science commons diverges from proprietary science primarily in being open and being very broadly available. These features make the science commons particularly valuable for advancing knowledge, for training innovators who will ultimately work in both public and private sectors, and in providing a common stock of knowledge upon which all players—both public and private—can draw readily. Open science plays two important roles that proprietary R&D cannot: it enables practical benefits even in the absence of profitable markets for goods and services, and its lays a shared foundation for subsequent private R&D. The history of genomics in the period 1992–2004, covering two periods when genomic startup firms attracted significant private R&D investment, illustrates these features of how a science commons contributes value. Commercial interest in genomics was intense during this period. Fierce competition between private sector and public sector genomics programs was highly visible. Seemingly anomalous behavior, such as private firms funding “open science,” can be explained by unusual business dynamics between established firms wanting to preserve a robust science commons to prevent startup firms from limiting established firms’ freedom to operate. Deliberate policies to create and protect a large science commons were pursued by nonprofit and government funders of genomics research, such as the Wellcome Trust and National Institutes of Health. These policies were crucial to keeping genomic data and research tools widely available at low cost. Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers 2006-12-07 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC4982884/ /pubmed/27570367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9016-9 Text en © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Cook-Deegan, Robert
The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title_full The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title_fullStr The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title_full_unstemmed The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title_short The science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
title_sort science commons in health research: structure, function, and value
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27570367
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9016-9
work_keys_str_mv AT cookdeeganrobert thesciencecommonsinhealthresearchstructurefunctionandvalue
AT cookdeeganrobert sciencecommonsinhealthresearchstructurefunctionandvalue