Cargando…
The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort
BACKGROUND: The Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) case-control cohort consisting of 1447 pre-eclamptic and 1068 non-pre-eclamptic women was recruited during 2008–2011 to study genetic background of pre-eclampsia and foetal growth. Pre-eclampsia was defined by hypertension and proteinuria ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27520381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1010-0 |
_version_ | 1782447843428007936 |
---|---|
author | Kallela, Jenni Jääskeläinen, Tiina Kortelainen, Eija Heinonen, Seppo Kajantie, Eero Kere, Juha Kivinen, Katja Pouta, Anneli Laivuori, Hannele |
author_facet | Kallela, Jenni Jääskeläinen, Tiina Kortelainen, Eija Heinonen, Seppo Kajantie, Eero Kere, Juha Kivinen, Katja Pouta, Anneli Laivuori, Hannele |
author_sort | Kallela, Jenni |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) case-control cohort consisting of 1447 pre-eclamptic and 1068 non-pre-eclamptic women was recruited during 2008–2011 to study genetic background of pre-eclampsia and foetal growth. Pre-eclampsia was defined by hypertension and proteinuria according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2002 classification. The ACOG Task Force Report on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013) and The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) (2014) have published new classifications, in which proteinuria is not necessary for diagnosis when specific symptoms are present. For diagnoses based on proteinuria, the ISSHP 2014 criteria raised its threshold to 2+ on dipstick. We studied how the new classifications would affect pre-eclampsia diagnoses in the FINNPEC cohort. METHODS: We re-evaluated pre-eclampsia diagnosis using the ACOG 2013 and the ISSHP 2014 classifications in pre-eclamptic women whose proteinuria did not exceed 1+ on dipstick (n = 68), in women with gestational hypertension (n = 138) and in women with chronic hypertension (n = 66). RESULTS: The number of women with pre-eclampsia increased 0.8 % (1459/1447) according to the ACOG 2013 criteria and 0.6 % (1455/1447) according to the ISSHP 2014 criteria. All 68 women with the amount of proteinuria not exceeding 1+ on dipstick diagnosed originally pre-eclamptic met the ACOG 2013 criteria but only 20 women (29.4 %) met the ISSHP 2014 criteria. Seven (5.1 %) and 35 (25.4 %) women with gestational hypertension were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia according to the ACOG 2013 and the ISSHP 2014 criteria, respectively. Correspondingly five (7.6 %) and 21 (31.8 %) women with chronic hypertension were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia according to the ACOG 2 013 and the ISSHP 2014 criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Only minor changes were observed in the total number of pre-eclamptic women in the FINNPEC cohort when comparing the ACOC 2002 classification with the ACOG 2013 and ISSHP 2014 classifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4983019 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49830192016-08-14 The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort Kallela, Jenni Jääskeläinen, Tiina Kortelainen, Eija Heinonen, Seppo Kajantie, Eero Kere, Juha Kivinen, Katja Pouta, Anneli Laivuori, Hannele BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: The Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) case-control cohort consisting of 1447 pre-eclamptic and 1068 non-pre-eclamptic women was recruited during 2008–2011 to study genetic background of pre-eclampsia and foetal growth. Pre-eclampsia was defined by hypertension and proteinuria according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2002 classification. The ACOG Task Force Report on Hypertension in Pregnancy (2013) and The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) (2014) have published new classifications, in which proteinuria is not necessary for diagnosis when specific symptoms are present. For diagnoses based on proteinuria, the ISSHP 2014 criteria raised its threshold to 2+ on dipstick. We studied how the new classifications would affect pre-eclampsia diagnoses in the FINNPEC cohort. METHODS: We re-evaluated pre-eclampsia diagnosis using the ACOG 2013 and the ISSHP 2014 classifications in pre-eclamptic women whose proteinuria did not exceed 1+ on dipstick (n = 68), in women with gestational hypertension (n = 138) and in women with chronic hypertension (n = 66). RESULTS: The number of women with pre-eclampsia increased 0.8 % (1459/1447) according to the ACOG 2013 criteria and 0.6 % (1455/1447) according to the ISSHP 2014 criteria. All 68 women with the amount of proteinuria not exceeding 1+ on dipstick diagnosed originally pre-eclamptic met the ACOG 2013 criteria but only 20 women (29.4 %) met the ISSHP 2014 criteria. Seven (5.1 %) and 35 (25.4 %) women with gestational hypertension were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia according to the ACOG 2013 and the ISSHP 2014 criteria, respectively. Correspondingly five (7.6 %) and 21 (31.8 %) women with chronic hypertension were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia according to the ACOG 2 013 and the ISSHP 2014 criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Only minor changes were observed in the total number of pre-eclamptic women in the FINNPEC cohort when comparing the ACOC 2002 classification with the ACOG 2013 and ISSHP 2014 classifications. BioMed Central 2016-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4983019/ /pubmed/27520381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1010-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kallela, Jenni Jääskeläinen, Tiina Kortelainen, Eija Heinonen, Seppo Kajantie, Eero Kere, Juha Kivinen, Katja Pouta, Anneli Laivuori, Hannele The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title | The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title_full | The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title_fullStr | The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title_short | The diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the Finnish Pre-eclampsia Consortium (FINNPEC) cohort |
title_sort | diagnosis of pre-eclampsia using two revised classifications in the finnish pre-eclampsia consortium (finnpec) cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983019/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27520381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1010-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kallelajenni thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT jaaskelainentiina thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kortelaineneija thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT heinonenseppo thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kajantieeero thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kerejuha thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kivinenkatja thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT poutaanneli thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT laivuorihannele thediagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kallelajenni diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT jaaskelainentiina diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kortelaineneija diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT heinonenseppo diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kajantieeero diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kerejuha diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT kivinenkatja diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT poutaanneli diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort AT laivuorihannele diagnosisofpreeclampsiausingtworevisedclassificationsinthefinnishpreeclampsiaconsortiumfinnpeccohort |