Cargando…

The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review

OBJECTIVE: To review the current definitions, terminology, epidemiology and aetiology of detrusor underactivity (DU), with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria in use. In addition, we address the relation and the overlap between DU and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). In this mini-review,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Ahmed, Farhan, Bilal, Vernez, Simone, Ghoniem, Gamal M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.005
_version_ 1782447874163867648
author Ahmed, Ahmed
Farhan, Bilal
Vernez, Simone
Ghoniem, Gamal M.
author_facet Ahmed, Ahmed
Farhan, Bilal
Vernez, Simone
Ghoniem, Gamal M.
author_sort Ahmed, Ahmed
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To review the current definitions, terminology, epidemiology and aetiology of detrusor underactivity (DU), with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria in use. In addition, we address the relation and the overlap between DU and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). In this mini-review, we hope to help identify DU patients and facilitate structured clinical evaluation and research. METHODS: We searched the English literature using ScienceDirect and PubMed for relevant articles. We used the following terms: ‘detrusor underactivity’, ‘underactive bladder’, ‘post voiding residual’, ‘post micturition residual’, ‘acontractile bladder’, ‘detrusor failure’, and ‘detrusor areflexia’. RESULT: DU is one of the most common conditions causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Unfortunately, it is also the most poorly understood bladder dysfunction with scant research. To our knowledge there is no clear definition and no non-invasive method to characterise this important clinical condition. DU may result from the normal ageing process; however, it has multiple aetiologies including neurogenic and myogenic dysfunction. In many cases the symptoms of DU are similar to those of BOO and it usually requires invasive urodynamic study (UDS) for diagnosis to differentiate the two diagnoses. A number of diagnostic tests may be used including: UDS testing, the Schafer pressure/flow nomogram, linear passive urethral resistance relation, Watts factor, and the bladder contractility index. Of these, UDS testing is the most practical as it determines both the maximum urinary flow rate and the pressure exerted by the detrusor muscle relative to the maximal flow of urine, allowing for precise characterisation of detrusor function. CONCLUSION: Currently, the diagnosis of DU is based on invasive urodynamic parameters as defined by the International Continence Society in 2002. There is no consensus for the definition of DU prior to 2002. As there is significant overlap between the symptoms of DU and BOO, it is difficult to diagnose DU clinically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4983158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49831582016-08-19 The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review Ahmed, Ahmed Farhan, Bilal Vernez, Simone Ghoniem, Gamal M. Arab J Urol Mini-Review OBJECTIVE: To review the current definitions, terminology, epidemiology and aetiology of detrusor underactivity (DU), with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria in use. In addition, we address the relation and the overlap between DU and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). In this mini-review, we hope to help identify DU patients and facilitate structured clinical evaluation and research. METHODS: We searched the English literature using ScienceDirect and PubMed for relevant articles. We used the following terms: ‘detrusor underactivity’, ‘underactive bladder’, ‘post voiding residual’, ‘post micturition residual’, ‘acontractile bladder’, ‘detrusor failure’, and ‘detrusor areflexia’. RESULT: DU is one of the most common conditions causing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Unfortunately, it is also the most poorly understood bladder dysfunction with scant research. To our knowledge there is no clear definition and no non-invasive method to characterise this important clinical condition. DU may result from the normal ageing process; however, it has multiple aetiologies including neurogenic and myogenic dysfunction. In many cases the symptoms of DU are similar to those of BOO and it usually requires invasive urodynamic study (UDS) for diagnosis to differentiate the two diagnoses. A number of diagnostic tests may be used including: UDS testing, the Schafer pressure/flow nomogram, linear passive urethral resistance relation, Watts factor, and the bladder contractility index. Of these, UDS testing is the most practical as it determines both the maximum urinary flow rate and the pressure exerted by the detrusor muscle relative to the maximal flow of urine, allowing for precise characterisation of detrusor function. CONCLUSION: Currently, the diagnosis of DU is based on invasive urodynamic parameters as defined by the International Continence Society in 2002. There is no consensus for the definition of DU prior to 2002. As there is significant overlap between the symptoms of DU and BOO, it is difficult to diagnose DU clinically. Elsevier 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4983158/ /pubmed/27547465 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.005 Text en © 2016 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Mini-Review
Ahmed, Ahmed
Farhan, Bilal
Vernez, Simone
Ghoniem, Gamal M.
The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title_full The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title_fullStr The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title_full_unstemmed The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title_short The challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: A mini-review
title_sort challenges in the diagnosis of detrusor underactivity in clinical practice: a mini-review
topic Mini-Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547465
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedahmed thechallengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT farhanbilal thechallengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT vernezsimone thechallengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT ghoniemgamalm thechallengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT ahmedahmed challengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT farhanbilal challengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT vernezsimone challengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview
AT ghoniemgamalm challengesinthediagnosisofdetrusorunderactivityinclinicalpracticeaminireview