Cargando…

Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference in mean stone size, as measured on bone window vs standard soft-tissue window setting using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with a solitary ureteric stone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 60 patients presenting to the emergency and outpatient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soomro, Hussam Uddin, Hammad Ather, M., Salam, Basit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.006
_version_ 1782447874401894400
author Soomro, Hussam Uddin
Hammad Ather, M.
Salam, Basit
author_facet Soomro, Hussam Uddin
Hammad Ather, M.
Salam, Basit
author_sort Soomro, Hussam Uddin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference in mean stone size, as measured on bone window vs standard soft-tissue window setting using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with a solitary ureteric stone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 60 patients presenting to the emergency and outpatient departments of a University Hospital from May 2015 to October 2015 and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A 64-slice MDCT was used to assess the locations and size of the ureteric stones. A consultant radiologist independently analysed the MDCT scans of all the patients. The mean difference in stone size was calculated between both window settings in axial and coronal planes. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 37.13 (11.9) years. Males constituted ∼68% of the cohort and 32% were female. In all, 85% of the patients had left ureteric stones and 15% had right ureteric stones. The mean (SD) stone size, as measured on the soft-tissue window setting was 6.68 (2.01) mm, and on the bone window setting was 4.8 (1.9) mm. The mean (SD) difference in stone size between the two window settings was +1.85 (0.55) mm. The two means were compared using Student’s t-test, and the difference was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The stone size measured using the soft-tissue window setting on a MDCT is significantly different from the measurement on the bone window setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4983159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49831592016-08-19 Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography Soomro, Hussam Uddin Hammad Ather, M. Salam, Basit Arab J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference in mean stone size, as measured on bone window vs standard soft-tissue window setting using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with a solitary ureteric stone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 60 patients presenting to the emergency and outpatient departments of a University Hospital from May 2015 to October 2015 and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A 64-slice MDCT was used to assess the locations and size of the ureteric stones. A consultant radiologist independently analysed the MDCT scans of all the patients. The mean difference in stone size was calculated between both window settings in axial and coronal planes. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 37.13 (11.9) years. Males constituted ∼68% of the cohort and 32% were female. In all, 85% of the patients had left ureteric stones and 15% had right ureteric stones. The mean (SD) stone size, as measured on the soft-tissue window setting was 6.68 (2.01) mm, and on the bone window setting was 4.8 (1.9) mm. The mean (SD) difference in stone size between the two window settings was +1.85 (0.55) mm. The two means were compared using Student’s t-test, and the difference was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The stone size measured using the soft-tissue window setting on a MDCT is significantly different from the measurement on the bone window setting. Elsevier 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4983159/ /pubmed/27547460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.006 Text en © 2016 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Soomro, Hussam Uddin
Hammad Ather, M.
Salam, Basit
Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title_full Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title_fullStr Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title_short Comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
title_sort comparison of ureteric stone size, on bone window versus standard soft-tissue window settings, on multi-detector non-contrast computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2016.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT soomrohussamuddin comparisonofuretericstonesizeonbonewindowversusstandardsofttissuewindowsettingsonmultidetectornoncontrastcomputedtomography
AT hammadatherm comparisonofuretericstonesizeonbonewindowversusstandardsofttissuewindowsettingsonmultidetectornoncontrastcomputedtomography
AT salambasit comparisonofuretericstonesizeonbonewindowversusstandardsofttissuewindowsettingsonmultidetectornoncontrastcomputedtomography