Cargando…
Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS A...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559349 |
_version_ | 1782447884855148544 |
---|---|
author | Yaghini, Jaber Naghsh, Narges Attaei, Elaheh Birang, Reza Birang, Ehsan |
author_facet | Yaghini, Jaber Naghsh, Narges Attaei, Elaheh Birang, Reza Birang, Ehsan |
author_sort | Yaghini, Jaber |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 56 extracted sound single-rooted teeth with moderate level of calculus were selected and randomly divided into four groups: SRP was performed with Er:YAG laser (100 mJ pulse, 1W, 10Hz, VSP and contact mode, with 50% water and air) in group one, hand instrument in group two and ultrasonic tool in group three. Group four was considered as the control group. After SRP, all samples were cut by Servocut cutting machine into pieces with 3×3×2mm dimensions. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin. The surface roughness of the samples was evaluated with profilometry, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in SPSS software. RESULTS: Surface roughness was higher in laser and lower in ultrasonic group compared to other groups. There was a significant difference in surface roughness between laser and ultrasonic groups (P=0.043), but there was no significant difference in surface roughness among other groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that surface roughness after SRP with Er:YAG laser was not higher than that after manual SRP, but the former value was higher than that after SRP with ultrasonic instrument. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4983305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49833052016-08-24 Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry Yaghini, Jaber Naghsh, Narges Attaei, Elaheh Birang, Reza Birang, Ehsan J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 56 extracted sound single-rooted teeth with moderate level of calculus were selected and randomly divided into four groups: SRP was performed with Er:YAG laser (100 mJ pulse, 1W, 10Hz, VSP and contact mode, with 50% water and air) in group one, hand instrument in group two and ultrasonic tool in group three. Group four was considered as the control group. After SRP, all samples were cut by Servocut cutting machine into pieces with 3×3×2mm dimensions. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin. The surface roughness of the samples was evaluated with profilometry, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in SPSS software. RESULTS: Surface roughness was higher in laser and lower in ultrasonic group compared to other groups. There was a significant difference in surface roughness between laser and ultrasonic groups (P=0.043), but there was no significant difference in surface roughness among other groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that surface roughness after SRP with Er:YAG laser was not higher than that after manual SRP, but the former value was higher than that after SRP with ultrasonic instrument. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4983305/ /pubmed/27559349 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yaghini, Jaber Naghsh, Narges Attaei, Elaheh Birang, Reza Birang, Ehsan Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title | Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title_full | Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title_fullStr | Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title_full_unstemmed | Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title_short | Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry |
title_sort | root surface roughness after scaling and root planing with er:yag laser compared to hand and ultrasonic instruments by profilometry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559349 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaghinijaber rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry AT naghshnarges rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry AT attaeielaheh rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry AT birangreza rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry AT birangehsan rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry |