Cargando…

Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry

OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yaghini, Jaber, Naghsh, Narges, Attaei, Elaheh, Birang, Reza, Birang, Ehsan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559349
_version_ 1782447884855148544
author Yaghini, Jaber
Naghsh, Narges
Attaei, Elaheh
Birang, Reza
Birang, Ehsan
author_facet Yaghini, Jaber
Naghsh, Narges
Attaei, Elaheh
Birang, Reza
Birang, Ehsan
author_sort Yaghini, Jaber
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 56 extracted sound single-rooted teeth with moderate level of calculus were selected and randomly divided into four groups: SRP was performed with Er:YAG laser (100 mJ pulse, 1W, 10Hz, VSP and contact mode, with 50% water and air) in group one, hand instrument in group two and ultrasonic tool in group three. Group four was considered as the control group. After SRP, all samples were cut by Servocut cutting machine into pieces with 3×3×2mm dimensions. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin. The surface roughness of the samples was evaluated with profilometry, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in SPSS software. RESULTS: Surface roughness was higher in laser and lower in ultrasonic group compared to other groups. There was a significant difference in surface roughness between laser and ultrasonic groups (P=0.043), but there was no significant difference in surface roughness among other groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that surface roughness after SRP with Er:YAG laser was not higher than that after manual SRP, but the former value was higher than that after SRP with ultrasonic instrument.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4983305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49833052016-08-24 Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry Yaghini, Jaber Naghsh, Narges Attaei, Elaheh Birang, Reza Birang, Ehsan J Dent (Tehran) Original Article OBJECTIVES: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is one of the most commonly used procedures during periodontal treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the root surface roughness after SRP with erbium: yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser compared to ultrasonic and hand instruments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this experimental study, 56 extracted sound single-rooted teeth with moderate level of calculus were selected and randomly divided into four groups: SRP was performed with Er:YAG laser (100 mJ pulse, 1W, 10Hz, VSP and contact mode, with 50% water and air) in group one, hand instrument in group two and ultrasonic tool in group three. Group four was considered as the control group. After SRP, all samples were cut by Servocut cutting machine into pieces with 3×3×2mm dimensions. The samples were mounted in acrylic resin. The surface roughness of the samples was evaluated with profilometry, and the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in SPSS software. RESULTS: Surface roughness was higher in laser and lower in ultrasonic group compared to other groups. There was a significant difference in surface roughness between laser and ultrasonic groups (P=0.043), but there was no significant difference in surface roughness among other groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that surface roughness after SRP with Er:YAG laser was not higher than that after manual SRP, but the former value was higher than that after SRP with ultrasonic instrument. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4983305/ /pubmed/27559349 Text en Copyright© Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yaghini, Jaber
Naghsh, Narges
Attaei, Elaheh
Birang, Reza
Birang, Ehsan
Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title_full Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title_fullStr Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title_full_unstemmed Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title_short Root Surface Roughness After Scaling and Root Planing with Er:YAG Laser Compared to Hand and Ultrasonic Instruments by Profilometry
title_sort root surface roughness after scaling and root planing with er:yag laser compared to hand and ultrasonic instruments by profilometry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27559349
work_keys_str_mv AT yaghinijaber rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry
AT naghshnarges rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry
AT attaeielaheh rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry
AT birangreza rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry
AT birangehsan rootsurfaceroughnessafterscalingandrootplaningwitheryaglasercomparedtohandandultrasonicinstrumentsbyprofilometry