Cargando…

Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?

The primary objective of this study was to test the relevance of hydrological classification and class differences to the characteristics of woody riparian vegetation in a subtropical landscape in Queensland, Australia. We followed classification procedures of the environmental flow framework ELOHA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Cassandra S., Mackay, Stephen J., Arthington, Angela H., Capon, Samantha J., Barnes, Anna, Pearson, Ben
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2249
_version_ 1782447923982761984
author James, Cassandra S.
Mackay, Stephen J.
Arthington, Angela H.
Capon, Samantha J.
Barnes, Anna
Pearson, Ben
author_facet James, Cassandra S.
Mackay, Stephen J.
Arthington, Angela H.
Capon, Samantha J.
Barnes, Anna
Pearson, Ben
author_sort James, Cassandra S.
collection PubMed
description The primary objective of this study was to test the relevance of hydrological classification and class differences to the characteristics of woody riparian vegetation in a subtropical landscape in Queensland, Australia. We followed classification procedures of the environmental flow framework ELOHA – Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration. Riparian surveys at 44 sites distributed across five flow classes recorded 191 woody riparian species and 15, 500 individuals. There were differences among flow classes for riparian species richness, total abundance, and abundance of regenerating native trees and shrubs. There were also significant class differences in the occurrence of three common tree species, and 21 indicator species (mostly native taxa) further distinguished the vegetation characteristics of each flow class. We investigated the influence of key drivers of riparian vegetation structure (climate, depth to water table, stream‐specific power, substrate type, degree of hydrologic alteration, and land use) on riparian vegetation. Patterns were explained largely by climate, particularly annual rainfall and temperature. Strong covarying drivers (hydrology and climate) prevented us from isolating the independent influences of these drivers on riparian assemblage structure. The prevalence of species considered typically rheophytic in some flow classes implies a more substantial role for flow in these classes but needs further testing. No relationships were found between land use and riparian vegetation composition and structure. This study demonstrates the relevance of flow classification to the structure of riparian vegetation in a subtropical landscape, and the influence of covarying drivers on riparian patterns. Management of environmental flows to influence riparian vegetation assemblages would likely have most potential in sites dominated by rheophytic species where hydrological influences override other controls. In contrast, where vegetation assemblages are dominated by a diverse array of typical rainforest species, and other factors including broad‐scale climatic gradients and topographic variables have greater influence than hydrology, riparian vegetation is likely to be less responsive to environmental flow management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4983605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49836052016-08-19 Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments? James, Cassandra S. Mackay, Stephen J. Arthington, Angela H. Capon, Samantha J. Barnes, Anna Pearson, Ben Ecol Evol Original Research The primary objective of this study was to test the relevance of hydrological classification and class differences to the characteristics of woody riparian vegetation in a subtropical landscape in Queensland, Australia. We followed classification procedures of the environmental flow framework ELOHA – Ecological Limits of Hydrologic Alteration. Riparian surveys at 44 sites distributed across five flow classes recorded 191 woody riparian species and 15, 500 individuals. There were differences among flow classes for riparian species richness, total abundance, and abundance of regenerating native trees and shrubs. There were also significant class differences in the occurrence of three common tree species, and 21 indicator species (mostly native taxa) further distinguished the vegetation characteristics of each flow class. We investigated the influence of key drivers of riparian vegetation structure (climate, depth to water table, stream‐specific power, substrate type, degree of hydrologic alteration, and land use) on riparian vegetation. Patterns were explained largely by climate, particularly annual rainfall and temperature. Strong covarying drivers (hydrology and climate) prevented us from isolating the independent influences of these drivers on riparian assemblage structure. The prevalence of species considered typically rheophytic in some flow classes implies a more substantial role for flow in these classes but needs further testing. No relationships were found between land use and riparian vegetation composition and structure. This study demonstrates the relevance of flow classification to the structure of riparian vegetation in a subtropical landscape, and the influence of covarying drivers on riparian patterns. Management of environmental flows to influence riparian vegetation assemblages would likely have most potential in sites dominated by rheophytic species where hydrological influences override other controls. In contrast, where vegetation assemblages are dominated by a diverse array of typical rainforest species, and other factors including broad‐scale climatic gradients and topographic variables have greater influence than hydrology, riparian vegetation is likely to be less responsive to environmental flow management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4983605/ /pubmed/27547368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2249 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
James, Cassandra S.
Mackay, Stephen J.
Arthington, Angela H.
Capon, Samantha J.
Barnes, Anna
Pearson, Ben
Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title_full Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title_fullStr Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title_full_unstemmed Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title_short Does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
title_sort does stream flow structure woody riparian vegetation in subtropical catchments?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4983605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27547368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2249
work_keys_str_mv AT jamescassandras doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments
AT mackaystephenj doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments
AT arthingtonangelah doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments
AT caponsamanthaj doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments
AT barnesanna doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments
AT pearsonben doesstreamflowstructurewoodyriparianvegetationinsubtropicalcatchments