Cargando…

A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening currently relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination. However, recent large-scale studies have questioned the long-term efficacy of these tests, and biomarkers that accurately identify PCa are needed. METHODS: We analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharova, Evgeniya, Grassi, Angela, Marcer, Anna, Ruggero, Katia, Pinto, Francesco, Bassi, Pierfrancesco, Zanovello, Paola, Zattoni, Filiberto, D'Agostino, Donna M, Iafrate, Massimo, Ciminale, Vincenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.151
_version_ 1782447969505640448
author Sharova, Evgeniya
Grassi, Angela
Marcer, Anna
Ruggero, Katia
Pinto, Francesco
Bassi, Pierfrancesco
Zanovello, Paola
Zattoni, Filiberto
D'Agostino, Donna M
Iafrate, Massimo
Ciminale, Vincenzo
author_facet Sharova, Evgeniya
Grassi, Angela
Marcer, Anna
Ruggero, Katia
Pinto, Francesco
Bassi, Pierfrancesco
Zanovello, Paola
Zattoni, Filiberto
D'Agostino, Donna M
Iafrate, Massimo
Ciminale, Vincenzo
author_sort Sharova, Evgeniya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening currently relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination. However, recent large-scale studies have questioned the long-term efficacy of these tests, and biomarkers that accurately identify PCa are needed. METHODS: We analysed the levels of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with elevated PSA who were diagnosed with either localised PCa (n=36) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, n=31) upon biopsy. Real-time RT–PCR with Taqman probes was used to measure plasma levels of miRNAs. To circumvent problems associated with circulating miRNA quantitation, we computed the expression ratios of upregulated and downregulated miRNAs. RESULTS: The miR-106a/miR-130b and miR-106a/miR-223 ratios were significantly different between the biopsy-positive and BPH groups (P<0.0001), and yielded statistical power values that were >0.99. Both miRNA ratios were highly sensitive and more specific than PSA in discriminating localised PCa from BPH. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under curve values of 0.81 (miR-106a/miR-130b) and 0.77 (miR-106a/miR-223). CONCLUSIONS: Testing for circulating miR-106a/miR-130b and miR-106a/miR-223 ratios may reduce the costs and morbidity of unnecessary biopsies and is feasible for large-scale screening, as it requires measuring only three miRNAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4984473
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49844732017-06-14 A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening Sharova, Evgeniya Grassi, Angela Marcer, Anna Ruggero, Katia Pinto, Francesco Bassi, Pierfrancesco Zanovello, Paola Zattoni, Filiberto D'Agostino, Donna M Iafrate, Massimo Ciminale, Vincenzo Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) screening currently relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and digital rectal examination. However, recent large-scale studies have questioned the long-term efficacy of these tests, and biomarkers that accurately identify PCa are needed. METHODS: We analysed the levels of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) in patients with elevated PSA who were diagnosed with either localised PCa (n=36) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, n=31) upon biopsy. Real-time RT–PCR with Taqman probes was used to measure plasma levels of miRNAs. To circumvent problems associated with circulating miRNA quantitation, we computed the expression ratios of upregulated and downregulated miRNAs. RESULTS: The miR-106a/miR-130b and miR-106a/miR-223 ratios were significantly different between the biopsy-positive and BPH groups (P<0.0001), and yielded statistical power values that were >0.99. Both miRNA ratios were highly sensitive and more specific than PSA in discriminating localised PCa from BPH. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed area under curve values of 0.81 (miR-106a/miR-130b) and 0.77 (miR-106a/miR-223). CONCLUSIONS: Testing for circulating miR-106a/miR-130b and miR-106a/miR-223 ratios may reduce the costs and morbidity of unnecessary biopsies and is feasible for large-scale screening, as it requires measuring only three miRNAs. Nature Publishing Group 2016-06-14 2016-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4984473/ /pubmed/27228285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.151 Text en Copyright © 2016 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Molecular Diagnostics
Sharova, Evgeniya
Grassi, Angela
Marcer, Anna
Ruggero, Katia
Pinto, Francesco
Bassi, Pierfrancesco
Zanovello, Paola
Zattoni, Filiberto
D'Agostino, Donna M
Iafrate, Massimo
Ciminale, Vincenzo
A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title_full A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title_fullStr A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title_short A circulating miRNA assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
title_sort circulating mirna assay as a first-line test for prostate cancer screening
topic Molecular Diagnostics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984473/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27228285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.151
work_keys_str_mv AT sharovaevgeniya acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT grassiangela acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT marceranna acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT ruggerokatia acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT pintofrancesco acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT bassipierfrancesco acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT zanovellopaola acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT zattonifiliberto acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT dagostinodonnam acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT iafratemassimo acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT ciminalevincenzo acirculatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT sharovaevgeniya circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT grassiangela circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT marceranna circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT ruggerokatia circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT pintofrancesco circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT bassipierfrancesco circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT zanovellopaola circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT zattonifiliberto circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT dagostinodonnam circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT iafratemassimo circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening
AT ciminalevincenzo circulatingmirnaassayasafirstlinetestforprostatecancerscreening