Cargando…
A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are inde...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292 |
_version_ | 1782447977935142912 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Wilson J. Irvine, Kathryn M. Rodhouse, Thomas J. |
author_facet | Wright, Wilson J. Irvine, Kathryn M. Rodhouse, Thomas J. |
author_sort | Wright, Wilson J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are independent Bernoulli trials, but this assumption becomes untenable when ecologists serially deploy remote cameras and acoustic recording devices over days and weeks to survey rare and elusive animals. Proposed solutions involve modifying the detection‐level component of the model (e.g., first‐order Markov covariate). Evaluating whether a model sufficiently accounts for correlation is imperative, but clear guidance for practitioners is lacking. Currently, an omnibus goodness‐of‐fit test using a chi‐square discrepancy measure on unique detection histories is available for occupancy models (MacKenzie and Bailey, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 2004, 300; hereafter, MacKenzie–Bailey test). We propose a join count summary measure adapted from spatial statistics to directly assess correlation after fitting a model. We motivate our work with a dataset of multinight bat call recordings from a pilot study for the North American Bat Monitoring Program. We found in simulations that our join count test was more reliable than the MacKenzie–Bailey test for detecting inadequacy of a model that assumed independence, particularly when serial correlation was low to moderate. A model that included a Markov‐structured detection‐level covariate produced unbiased occupancy estimates except in the presence of strong serial correlation and a revisit design consisting only of temporal replicates. When applied to two common bat species, our approach illustrates that sophisticated models do not guarantee adequate fit to real data, underscoring the importance of model assessment. Our join count test provides a widely applicable goodness‐of‐fit test and specifically evaluates occupancy model lack of fit related to correlation among detections within a sample unit. Our diagnostic tool is available for practitioners that serially deploy survey equipment as a way to achieve cost savings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4984513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49845132016-08-22 A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits Wright, Wilson J. Irvine, Kathryn M. Rodhouse, Thomas J. Ecol Evol Original Research Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are independent Bernoulli trials, but this assumption becomes untenable when ecologists serially deploy remote cameras and acoustic recording devices over days and weeks to survey rare and elusive animals. Proposed solutions involve modifying the detection‐level component of the model (e.g., first‐order Markov covariate). Evaluating whether a model sufficiently accounts for correlation is imperative, but clear guidance for practitioners is lacking. Currently, an omnibus goodness‐of‐fit test using a chi‐square discrepancy measure on unique detection histories is available for occupancy models (MacKenzie and Bailey, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 2004, 300; hereafter, MacKenzie–Bailey test). We propose a join count summary measure adapted from spatial statistics to directly assess correlation after fitting a model. We motivate our work with a dataset of multinight bat call recordings from a pilot study for the North American Bat Monitoring Program. We found in simulations that our join count test was more reliable than the MacKenzie–Bailey test for detecting inadequacy of a model that assumed independence, particularly when serial correlation was low to moderate. A model that included a Markov‐structured detection‐level covariate produced unbiased occupancy estimates except in the presence of strong serial correlation and a revisit design consisting only of temporal replicates. When applied to two common bat species, our approach illustrates that sophisticated models do not guarantee adequate fit to real data, underscoring the importance of model assessment. Our join count test provides a widely applicable goodness‐of‐fit test and specifically evaluates occupancy model lack of fit related to correlation among detections within a sample unit. Our diagnostic tool is available for practitioners that serially deploy survey equipment as a way to achieve cost savings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4984513/ /pubmed/27551392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wright, Wilson J. Irvine, Kathryn M. Rodhouse, Thomas J. A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title | A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title_full | A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title_fullStr | A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title_full_unstemmed | A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title_short | A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
title_sort | goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightwilsonj agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits AT irvinekathrynm agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits AT rodhousethomasj agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits AT wrightwilsonj goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits AT irvinekathrynm goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits AT rodhousethomasj goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits |