Cargando…

A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits

Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are inde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Wilson J., Irvine, Kathryn M., Rodhouse, Thomas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292
_version_ 1782447977935142912
author Wright, Wilson J.
Irvine, Kathryn M.
Rodhouse, Thomas J.
author_facet Wright, Wilson J.
Irvine, Kathryn M.
Rodhouse, Thomas J.
author_sort Wright, Wilson J.
collection PubMed
description Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are independent Bernoulli trials, but this assumption becomes untenable when ecologists serially deploy remote cameras and acoustic recording devices over days and weeks to survey rare and elusive animals. Proposed solutions involve modifying the detection‐level component of the model (e.g., first‐order Markov covariate). Evaluating whether a model sufficiently accounts for correlation is imperative, but clear guidance for practitioners is lacking. Currently, an omnibus goodness‐of‐fit test using a chi‐square discrepancy measure on unique detection histories is available for occupancy models (MacKenzie and Bailey, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 2004, 300; hereafter, MacKenzie–Bailey test). We propose a join count summary measure adapted from spatial statistics to directly assess correlation after fitting a model. We motivate our work with a dataset of multinight bat call recordings from a pilot study for the North American Bat Monitoring Program. We found in simulations that our join count test was more reliable than the MacKenzie–Bailey test for detecting inadequacy of a model that assumed independence, particularly when serial correlation was low to moderate. A model that included a Markov‐structured detection‐level covariate produced unbiased occupancy estimates except in the presence of strong serial correlation and a revisit design consisting only of temporal replicates. When applied to two common bat species, our approach illustrates that sophisticated models do not guarantee adequate fit to real data, underscoring the importance of model assessment. Our join count test provides a widely applicable goodness‐of‐fit test and specifically evaluates occupancy model lack of fit related to correlation among detections within a sample unit. Our diagnostic tool is available for practitioners that serially deploy survey equipment as a way to achieve cost savings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4984513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49845132016-08-22 A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits Wright, Wilson J. Irvine, Kathryn M. Rodhouse, Thomas J. Ecol Evol Original Research Occupancy modeling is important for exploring species distribution patterns and for conservation monitoring. Within this framework, explicit attention is given to species detection probabilities estimated from replicate surveys to sample units. A central assumption is that replicate surveys are independent Bernoulli trials, but this assumption becomes untenable when ecologists serially deploy remote cameras and acoustic recording devices over days and weeks to survey rare and elusive animals. Proposed solutions involve modifying the detection‐level component of the model (e.g., first‐order Markov covariate). Evaluating whether a model sufficiently accounts for correlation is imperative, but clear guidance for practitioners is lacking. Currently, an omnibus goodness‐of‐fit test using a chi‐square discrepancy measure on unique detection histories is available for occupancy models (MacKenzie and Bailey, Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 9, 2004, 300; hereafter, MacKenzie–Bailey test). We propose a join count summary measure adapted from spatial statistics to directly assess correlation after fitting a model. We motivate our work with a dataset of multinight bat call recordings from a pilot study for the North American Bat Monitoring Program. We found in simulations that our join count test was more reliable than the MacKenzie–Bailey test for detecting inadequacy of a model that assumed independence, particularly when serial correlation was low to moderate. A model that included a Markov‐structured detection‐level covariate produced unbiased occupancy estimates except in the presence of strong serial correlation and a revisit design consisting only of temporal replicates. When applied to two common bat species, our approach illustrates that sophisticated models do not guarantee adequate fit to real data, underscoring the importance of model assessment. Our join count test provides a widely applicable goodness‐of‐fit test and specifically evaluates occupancy model lack of fit related to correlation among detections within a sample unit. Our diagnostic tool is available for practitioners that serially deploy survey equipment as a way to achieve cost savings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4984513/ /pubmed/27551392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wright, Wilson J.
Irvine, Kathryn M.
Rodhouse, Thomas J.
A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title_full A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title_fullStr A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title_full_unstemmed A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title_short A goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
title_sort goodness‐of‐fit test for occupancy models with correlated within‐season revisits
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551392
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2292
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightwilsonj agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits
AT irvinekathrynm agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits
AT rodhousethomasj agoodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits
AT wrightwilsonj goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits
AT irvinekathrynm goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits
AT rodhousethomasj goodnessoffittestforoccupancymodelswithcorrelatedwithinseasonrevisits