Cargando…

Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts

Host–parasite coevolution stems from reciprocal selection on host resistance and parasite infectivity, and can generate some of the strongest selective pressures known in nature. It is widely seen as a major driver of diversification, the most extreme case being parallel speciation in hosts and thei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Larose, Chloé, Schwander, Tanja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2264
_version_ 1782447978613571584
author Larose, Chloé
Schwander, Tanja
author_facet Larose, Chloé
Schwander, Tanja
author_sort Larose, Chloé
collection PubMed
description Host–parasite coevolution stems from reciprocal selection on host resistance and parasite infectivity, and can generate some of the strongest selective pressures known in nature. It is widely seen as a major driver of diversification, the most extreme case being parallel speciation in hosts and their associated parasites. Here, we report on endoparasitic nematodes, most likely members of the mermithid family, infecting different Timema stick insect species throughout California. The nematodes develop in the hemolymph of their insect host and kill it upon emergence, completely impeding host reproduction. Given the direct exposure of the endoparasites to the host's immune system in the hemolymph, and the consequences of infection on host fitness, we predicted that divergence among hosts may drive parallel divergence in the endoparasites. Our phylogenetic analyses suggested the presence of two differentiated endoparasite lineages. However, independently of whether the two lineages were considered separately or jointly, we found a complete lack of codivergence between the endoparasitic nematodes and their hosts in spite of extensive genetic variation among hosts and among parasites. Instead, there was strong isolation by distance among the endoparasitic nematodes, indicating that geography plays a more important role than host‐related adaptations in driving parasite diversification in this system. The accumulating evidence for lack of codiversification between parasites and their hosts at macroevolutionary scales contrasts with the overwhelming evidence for coevolution within populations, and calls for studies linking micro‐ versus macroevolutionary dynamics in host–parasite interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4984516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49845162016-08-22 Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts Larose, Chloé Schwander, Tanja Ecol Evol Original Research Host–parasite coevolution stems from reciprocal selection on host resistance and parasite infectivity, and can generate some of the strongest selective pressures known in nature. It is widely seen as a major driver of diversification, the most extreme case being parallel speciation in hosts and their associated parasites. Here, we report on endoparasitic nematodes, most likely members of the mermithid family, infecting different Timema stick insect species throughout California. The nematodes develop in the hemolymph of their insect host and kill it upon emergence, completely impeding host reproduction. Given the direct exposure of the endoparasites to the host's immune system in the hemolymph, and the consequences of infection on host fitness, we predicted that divergence among hosts may drive parallel divergence in the endoparasites. Our phylogenetic analyses suggested the presence of two differentiated endoparasite lineages. However, independently of whether the two lineages were considered separately or jointly, we found a complete lack of codivergence between the endoparasitic nematodes and their hosts in spite of extensive genetic variation among hosts and among parasites. Instead, there was strong isolation by distance among the endoparasitic nematodes, indicating that geography plays a more important role than host‐related adaptations in driving parasite diversification in this system. The accumulating evidence for lack of codiversification between parasites and their hosts at macroevolutionary scales contrasts with the overwhelming evidence for coevolution within populations, and calls for studies linking micro‐ versus macroevolutionary dynamics in host–parasite interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4984516/ /pubmed/27551395 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2264 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Larose, Chloé
Schwander, Tanja
Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title_full Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title_fullStr Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title_full_unstemmed Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title_short Nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
title_sort nematode endoparasites do not codiversify with their stick insect hosts
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4984516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27551395
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2264
work_keys_str_mv AT larosechloe nematodeendoparasitesdonotcodiversifywiththeirstickinsecthosts
AT schwandertanja nematodeendoparasitesdonotcodiversifywiththeirstickinsecthosts