Cargando…

Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid

Methanogenic inhibitors are often used to study methanogenesis in complex microbial communities or inhibit methanogens in the gastrointestinal tract of livestock. However, the resulting structural and functional changes in archaeal and bacterial communities are poorly understood. We characterized mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Webster, Tara M., Smith, Adam L., Reddy, Raghav R., Pinto, Ameet J., Hayes, Kim F., Raskin, Lutgarde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.349
_version_ 1782448083312836608
author Webster, Tara M.
Smith, Adam L.
Reddy, Raghav R.
Pinto, Ameet J.
Hayes, Kim F.
Raskin, Lutgarde
author_facet Webster, Tara M.
Smith, Adam L.
Reddy, Raghav R.
Pinto, Ameet J.
Hayes, Kim F.
Raskin, Lutgarde
author_sort Webster, Tara M.
collection PubMed
description Methanogenic inhibitors are often used to study methanogenesis in complex microbial communities or inhibit methanogens in the gastrointestinal tract of livestock. However, the resulting structural and functional changes in archaeal and bacterial communities are poorly understood. We characterized microbial community structure and activity in mesocosms seeded with cow dung and municipal wastewater treatment plant anaerobic digester sludge after exposure to two methanogenic inhibitors, 2‐bromoethanesulfonate (BES) and propynoic acid (PA). Methane production was reduced by 89% (0.5 mmol/L BES), 100% (10 mmol/LBES), 24% (0.1 mmol/LPA), and 95% (10 mmol/LPA). Using modified primers targeting the methyl‐coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene, changes in mcrA gene expression were found to correspond with changes in methane production and the relative activity of methanogens. Methanogenic activity was determined by the relative abundance of methanogen 16S rRNA cDNA as a percentage of the total community 16S rRNA cDNA. Overall, methanogenic activity was lower when mesocosms were exposed to higher concentrations of both inhibitors, and aceticlastic methanogens were inhibited to a greater extent than hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Syntrophic bacterial activity, measured by 16S rRNA cDNA, was also reduced following exposure to both inhibitors, but the overall structure of the active bacterial community was not significantly affected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4985588
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49855882016-08-22 Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid Webster, Tara M. Smith, Adam L. Reddy, Raghav R. Pinto, Ameet J. Hayes, Kim F. Raskin, Lutgarde Microbiologyopen Original Research Methanogenic inhibitors are often used to study methanogenesis in complex microbial communities or inhibit methanogens in the gastrointestinal tract of livestock. However, the resulting structural and functional changes in archaeal and bacterial communities are poorly understood. We characterized microbial community structure and activity in mesocosms seeded with cow dung and municipal wastewater treatment plant anaerobic digester sludge after exposure to two methanogenic inhibitors, 2‐bromoethanesulfonate (BES) and propynoic acid (PA). Methane production was reduced by 89% (0.5 mmol/L BES), 100% (10 mmol/LBES), 24% (0.1 mmol/LPA), and 95% (10 mmol/LPA). Using modified primers targeting the methyl‐coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene, changes in mcrA gene expression were found to correspond with changes in methane production and the relative activity of methanogens. Methanogenic activity was determined by the relative abundance of methanogen 16S rRNA cDNA as a percentage of the total community 16S rRNA cDNA. Overall, methanogenic activity was lower when mesocosms were exposed to higher concentrations of both inhibitors, and aceticlastic methanogens were inhibited to a greater extent than hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Syntrophic bacterial activity, measured by 16S rRNA cDNA, was also reduced following exposure to both inhibitors, but the overall structure of the active bacterial community was not significantly affected. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4985588/ /pubmed/26987552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.349 Text en © 2016 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Webster, Tara M.
Smith, Adam L.
Reddy, Raghav R.
Pinto, Ameet J.
Hayes, Kim F.
Raskin, Lutgarde
Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title_full Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title_fullStr Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title_full_unstemmed Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title_short Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
title_sort anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2‐bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4985588/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26987552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.349
work_keys_str_mv AT webstertaram anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid
AT smithadaml anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid
AT reddyraghavr anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid
AT pintoameetj anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid
AT hayeskimf anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid
AT raskinlutgarde anaerobicmicrobialcommunityresponsetomethanogenicinhibitors2bromoethanesulfonateandpropynoicacid